Intro to Intellectual Property

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Section 337

from class:

Intro to Intellectual Property

Definition

Section 337 is a provision in U.S. trade law that allows the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) to investigate and address unfair trade practices, such as patent infringement, that harm domestic industries. It is a powerful tool for patent holders to enforce their rights and prevent the importation of infringing products into the United States.

congrats on reading the definition of Section 337. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Section 337 investigations are conducted by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), an independent federal agency, rather than the federal courts.
  2. To prevail in a Section 337 case, the patent holder must show that there is a domestic industry related to the patented invention and that the importation of the infringing products threatens or destroys that domestic industry.
  3. The ITC has the authority to issue exclusion orders, which prohibit the importation of infringing products, as well as cease and desist orders, which prohibit the sale of infringing products already in the United States.
  4. Section 337 cases are often faster and more efficient than traditional patent infringement lawsuits in federal court, making them an attractive option for patent holders seeking to quickly stop the importation of infringing products.
  5. The ITC's decisions in Section 337 investigations can have a significant impact on the global supply chain and the availability of products in the U.S. market.

Review Questions

  • Explain the purpose and key features of Section 337 in the context of enforcing a patent.
    • The purpose of Section 337 is to provide a specialized and efficient mechanism for patent holders to address unfair trade practices, such as the importation of products that infringe on their patents. Key features of Section 337 include the ability to initiate investigations through the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), the requirement to demonstrate harm to a domestic industry, and the availability of powerful remedies such as exclusion orders and cease and desist orders. These features make Section 337 a valuable tool for patent holders seeking to quickly and effectively enforce their rights and prevent the importation of infringing products.
  • Describe the role of the domestic industry requirement in a Section 337 investigation and how it relates to the decision to enforce a patent.
    • One of the critical requirements for a successful Section 337 investigation is the existence of a domestic industry related to the patented invention. The patent holder must demonstrate that there is a significant investment in the United States in the exploitation of the patent, either through the production, service, or licensing of the patented technology. This domestic industry requirement ensures that Section 337 is used to protect U.S. companies and workers, rather than just the patent holder's interests. The strength and viability of the domestic industry is a key factor in the decision to pursue a Section 337 investigation as a means of enforcing a patent, as the ITC must find that the importation of infringing products threatens or destroys this domestic industry.
  • Analyze the strategic considerations a patent holder should weigh when deciding whether to enforce a patent through a Section 337 investigation versus a traditional patent infringement lawsuit in federal court.
    • When deciding whether to enforce a patent through a Section 337 investigation or a traditional patent infringement lawsuit in federal court, patent holders must carefully consider several strategic factors. Section 337 investigations are often faster and more efficient than federal court proceedings, making them an attractive option for patent holders who need to quickly stop the importation of infringing products. Additionally, the ITC's ability to issue powerful remedies like exclusion orders can be more effective than the damages and injunctions available in federal court. However, the domestic industry requirement and the need to demonstrate harm to that industry add an additional burden of proof for the patent holder. Federal court lawsuits may be preferable in situations where the patent holder does not have a significant domestic industry or where the infringing products are already in the U.S. market, rather than being imported. The choice between these enforcement mechanisms will depend on the specific circumstances of the case and the patent holder's strategic objectives.

"Section 337" also found in:

ยฉ 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
APยฎ and SATยฎ are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides