Lincoln-Douglas Debate

Definition

The Lincoln-Douglas Debate is a form of competitive debate that emphasizes values and ethics, typically featuring two participants arguing for and against a resolution. This style of debate focuses on moral philosophy, requiring debaters to not only present arguments but also engage with the underlying ethical implications of their positions. The format is named after the historic debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas in 1858, which highlighted key issues of the time, particularly regarding slavery and its moral ramifications.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Lincoln-Douglas Debates typically involve one-on-one competition and are structured with timed speeches, including constructive speeches, rebuttals, and cross-examinations.
2. Each debate centers around a resolution that is typically value-oriented, such as 'Resolved: Civil disobedience in a democracy is morally justified.'
3. Debaters are required to utilize logic, evidence, and moral reasoning to defend their positions, emphasizing ethical implications rather than just factual information.
4. Judges evaluate performances based on clarity, argument strength, cross-examination skills, and adherence to the value-based focus of the debate.
5. The format encourages deep understanding of philosophical concepts, as debaters often draw upon theories from prominent philosophers to bolster their arguments.

Review Questions

• How does the Lincoln-Douglas Debate format influence the types of arguments presented by debaters?
  • The Lincoln-Douglas Debate format emphasizes values and ethics, compelling debaters to focus on moral implications rather than just factual evidence. This structure allows for a rich exploration of philosophical concepts, as each argument must connect back to a broader ethical framework. Consequently, debaters must articulate how their positions align with or challenge societal values, leading to deeper discussions about morality in public discourse.
• Discuss the importance of value resolutions in Lincoln-Douglas Debates and how they shape the direction of each debate.
  • Value resolutions serve as the foundation for Lincoln-Douglas Debates, directing the focus toward ethical considerations. Each resolution presents a central moral question that debaters must navigate, allowing them to explore significant societal issues through a philosophical lens. By establishing these core values at stake, debates are enriched with nuanced discussions about what constitutes justice or morality within varying contexts.
• Evaluate the role of historical context in shaping the Lincoln-Douglas Debate format and its relevance in today's ethical discussions.
  • The Lincoln-Douglas Debate format is rooted in the historical debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas during a pivotal moment in American history. Their discussions about slavery and human rights established a template for engaging with ethical dilemmas through debate. Today, this format remains relevant as it encourages critical thinking about contemporary moral issues such as social justice and individual rights. By revisiting these foundational debates, participants can draw connections between historical values and current ethical challenges.

Related terms

Value Resolution: A statement that outlines the core value at stake in a Lincoln-Douglas Debate, often reflecting moral or ethical considerations.

Constructive Speech: The initial speech in a debate where debaters present their main arguments and establish the framework for their case.

Rebuttal: A speech following the constructive speeches where debaters respond to the opposing arguments, aiming to undermine their validity.