Support

Definition

In the context of argument mapping and diagramming, support refers to the evidence or reasons that back up a claim or conclusion in an argument. This is essential as it helps to establish the credibility of the argument and demonstrates how the conclusion logically follows from the premises. Strong support can come in various forms, such as statistics, expert opinions, examples, or logical reasoning, all of which contribute to the overall persuasiveness of an argument.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Support is crucial for making an argument persuasive; without adequate support, a claim can appear weak or unsubstantiated.
2. Different types of support can enhance arguments differently, with empirical evidence often being viewed as more robust than anecdotal evidence.
3. In argument mapping, support is visually represented to show how premises connect to conclusions, highlighting the flow of reasoning.
4. Identifying strong versus weak support helps in assessing the overall quality and reliability of an argument.
5. Logical fallacies often arise when support is based on irrelevant or insufficient evidence, weakening the argument's effectiveness.

Review Questions

• How does effective support enhance the quality of an argument in mapping and diagramming?
  • Effective support enhances the quality of an argument by providing credible evidence and reasoning that strengthens the link between premises and conclusion. It helps ensure that conclusions are not just asserted but are backed by solid foundations. This improves clarity and persuasiveness, allowing audiences to better understand and accept the argument being presented.
• Compare and contrast different types of support that can be used in an argument. How do they impact the argument's effectiveness?
  • Different types of support, such as statistical data versus personal anecdotes, can greatly impact an argument's effectiveness. Statistical data tends to provide a more objective foundation, making it more convincing in formal arguments. In contrast, personal anecdotes might resonate emotionally with an audience but may lack generalizability. The best arguments often blend various forms of support to appeal to both logic and emotion.
• Evaluate how recognizing weak support can influence one's ability to critique an argument effectively.
  • Recognizing weak support is crucial for critiquing arguments effectively as it allows individuals to identify flaws in reasoning or inadequate evidence backing claims. This skill enables critical thinkers to assess arguments more accurately and distinguish between persuasive rhetoric and sound logic. By understanding the importance of strong support, one can challenge unfounded assertions and engage in more meaningful discussions.

Related terms

Premise:

A statement or proposition that provides the foundation for an argument, offering the reasons that lead to a conclusion.

Conclusion:

The statement that an argument seeks to prove, which is derived from the premises and is supported by them.

Validity:

A characteristic of an argument where if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true, showcasing a logical structure.