Three-Fifths Compromise

Definition

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that determined how enslaved individuals would be counted for purposes of representation and taxation. Specifically, it stipulated that each enslaved person would be counted as three-fifths of a person, which had significant implications for political power and the structure of Congress, especially in the context of states with large enslaved populations.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. The compromise was necessary to appease Southern states, which relied heavily on enslaved labor and wanted their populations counted fully for representation.
2. In total, this compromise increased the political power of slaveholding states in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College.
3. It also highlighted the deep divisions between Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery during the formation of the United States.
4. The Three-Fifths Compromise was ultimately rendered moot by the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery in 1865.
5. The compromise is often viewed as a moral compromise that allowed the nation to form a government but perpetuated the institution of slavery.

Review Questions

• How did the Three-Fifths Compromise impact representation in Congress?
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise significantly affected how representation was calculated in Congress by allowing states with enslaved populations to count each enslaved individual as three-fifths of a person. This arrangement increased the number of representatives from Southern states, thereby enhancing their political power in Congress compared to Northern states where slavery was less prevalent. The compromise also underscored the tension between state interests and national unity during the formation of the Constitution.
• Discuss how the Three-Fifths Compromise reflects the broader conflicts between Northern and Southern states during the Constitutional Convention.
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise exemplified the intense conflict between Northern and Southern states over slavery during the Constitutional Convention. Southern delegates sought to maximize their political influence by counting enslaved individuals fully for representation, while Northern delegates aimed to limit that influence due to their growing abolitionist sentiments. This compromise ultimately balanced these competing interests but also illustrated how deeply entrenched divisions over slavery were woven into the fabric of American governance from its inception.
• Evaluate the long-term implications of the Three-Fifths Compromise on American political development and civil rights.
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise had profound long-term implications for American political development and civil rights. By institutionalizing a system that valued enslaved individuals as less than full persons, it entrenched racial inequality within the U.S. political system, affecting legislative power dynamics for decades. The legacy of this compromise contributed to ongoing conflicts over civil rights and ultimately fueled tensions leading up to the Civil War. Even after abolition, the lingering effects of such compromises influenced societal views on race and equality, shaping civil rights movements well into the 20th century.

Related terms

Constitutional Convention: The meeting held in 1787 where delegates from the thirteen original states gathered to create a new constitution for the United States, addressing issues like representation and slavery.

Apportionment: The process of distributing seats in the House of Representatives among the states based on population, which was directly influenced by how enslaved individuals were counted.

Fugitive Slave Clause: A provision in the U.S. Constitution that required escaped enslaved individuals to be returned to their owners, reflecting the contentious nature of slavery within the framework of the Constitution.