Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act

Definition

The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), also known as McCain-Feingold Act, is a federal law passed in 2002 aimed at regulating the financing of political campaigns. It sought to address the issues of soft money contributions and the influence of special interest groups on elections, thereby promoting transparency and accountability in the electoral process. The BCRA introduced restrictions on the use of soft money by political parties and imposed stricter limits on individual contributions to candidates.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. The BCRA was signed into law by President George W. Bush in March 2002.
2. It aimed to eliminate the influence of soft money in federal elections by prohibiting national political parties from raising or spending such funds.
3. The law increased the contribution limits for individual donors to candidates while simultaneously enforcing stricter regulations on campaign advertising and funding.
4. Parts of the BCRA were challenged in court, leading to significant Supreme Court decisions, including 'McConnell v. FEC' which upheld many of its provisions initially.
5. Despite its intentions, the BCRA's effectiveness has been debated, particularly in light of subsequent rulings like Citizens United v. FEC which expanded the scope of campaign financing.

Review Questions

• How did the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act aim to change the landscape of campaign financing?
  • The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act aimed to change campaign financing by addressing the problem of soft money contributions and reducing the influence of special interest groups on elections. By prohibiting national political parties from using soft money for federal elections and implementing stricter contribution limits for individuals, it sought to enhance transparency and ensure that campaign funding reflected the will of individual voters rather than wealthy donors or organizations. The law marked a significant attempt to reform how political campaigns are financed in order to create a more level playing field for candidates.
• Discuss the key provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act and their intended impact on elections.
  • Key provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act included the prohibition of soft money contributions to national parties, increased limits on individual contributions to candidates, and regulations on campaign advertisements. These measures were designed to reduce corruption and promote accountability within campaign financing. By restricting how much parties could raise and spend without accountability, the BCRA aimed to diminish the power of special interest groups and ensure that elections were primarily influenced by individual voters rather than large donations from wealthy sources.
• Evaluate the long-term effects of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act in light of subsequent Supreme Court decisions.
  • The long-term effects of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act have been significantly shaped by subsequent Supreme Court decisions, particularly Citizens United v. FEC. While the BCRA initially aimed to limit corporate influence and enhance transparency in campaign financing, Citizens United ruled that corporations have a First Amendment right to spend unlimited amounts on independent political expenditures. This ruling effectively undermined many provisions of the BCRA, allowing for an influx of outside spending and super PACs that can raise and spend unlimited sums, complicating efforts for reform in campaign finance and raising questions about the integrity of elections.

Related terms

Soft Money: Funds raised by political parties for activities like voter registration and grassroots organizing, which are not subject to federal limits.

Political Action Committee (PAC): An organization that collects and distributes funds to support candidates running for office, often representing specific interests or groups.

Citizens United v. FEC:

A landmark Supreme Court case that ruled that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts cannot be limited under the First Amendment.