Intro to Semantics and Pragmatics

🔠Intro to Semantics and Pragmatics Unit 4 – Compositionality and Semantic Roles

Compositionality and semantic roles are fundamental concepts in linguistics that explain how we derive meaning from language. Compositionality shows how complex expressions get their meaning from their parts, while semantic roles describe the relationships between predicates and arguments in sentences. These concepts are crucial for understanding how language works at a deeper level. They help explain how we can create and understand new sentences, and how we assign meaning to different parts of speech in various contexts.

Key Concepts

  • Compositionality involves understanding how the meaning of a complex expression is determined by the meanings of its parts and how they are combined
  • Semantic roles represent the semantic relationships between a predicate (verb) and its arguments (noun phrases) in a sentence
  • Thematic roles (agent, patient, theme, etc.) capture the general semantic roles that arguments can play in relation to a predicate
  • Propositional meaning refers to the literal, context-independent meaning of a sentence determined by the meanings of its parts and their syntactic arrangement
  • Argument structure specifies the number and types of arguments a predicate requires and the semantic roles they play
  • Valency refers to the number of arguments a predicate takes (intransitive, transitive, ditransitive)
  • Selectional restrictions constrain the semantic properties of the arguments a predicate can take (animate subject, abstract object, etc.)

Principles of Compositionality

  • The Principle of Compositionality states that the meaning of a complex expression is a function of the meanings of its parts and the way they are syntactically combined
    • Allows for productivity and systematicity in language by enabling the creation and understanding of novel expressions
  • Frege's Principle asserts that the meaning of a complex expression remains the same if a constituent expression is replaced by another with the same meaning (substitutivity)
  • The Principle of Context Independence holds that the meaning of an expression is determined by its parts and their arrangement, regardless of the context in which it occurs
  • Compositionality operates at various levels of linguistic structure, including morphology (word formation), syntax (sentence structure), and semantics (meaning)
  • The interpretation of a complex expression proceeds incrementally, with the meanings of smaller parts combining to form the meaning of larger constituents
    • Enables efficient processing and avoids the need to store the meanings of all possible complex expressions
  • Compositionality is a key assumption in formal semantics and is often modeled using lambda calculus and type theory

Types of Semantic Roles

  • Agent: The initiator or doer of an action (John in "John kicked the ball")
  • Patient: The entity affected by an action (the ball in "John kicked the ball")
  • Theme: The entity undergoing a change of location or possession (the book in "Mary gave the book to John")
  • Experiencer: The entity experiencing a psychological state or sensation (Mary in "Mary loves John")
  • Stimulus: The entity or event that triggers a psychological state (John in "Mary loves John")
  • Instrument: The means by which an action is performed (the key in "John opened the door with the key")
  • Location: The place where an event occurs or an entity is situated (the park in "The children played in the park")
    • Source: The starting point of a motion (home in "John went from home to school")
    • Goal: The endpoint of a motion (school in "John went from home to school")

Semantic Role Labeling

  • Semantic Role Labeling (SRL) is the task of automatically identifying the semantic roles of arguments in a sentence with respect to a given predicate
  • Involves two main steps: predicate identification and argument classification
    • Predicate identification determines which words in a sentence are predicates (typically verbs)
    • Argument classification assigns semantic roles to the arguments of each identified predicate
  • SRL systems often rely on syntactic parsing to identify the grammatical relations between predicates and arguments
  • Machine learning approaches, such as sequence labeling with conditional random fields (CRFs) or neural networks, are commonly used for SRL
  • Annotated corpora, such as PropBank and FrameNet, provide training data for SRL systems by annotating predicates and arguments with semantic roles
  • Challenges in SRL include dealing with implicit arguments, disambiguating role labels, and handling long-range dependencies and discontinuous arguments
  • SRL has applications in information extraction, question answering, machine translation, and other natural language understanding tasks

Compositional Analysis Techniques

  • Syntactic parsing is often the first step in compositional analysis, providing the hierarchical structure of a sentence
    • Constituency parsing identifies the phrase structure of a sentence using context-free grammars (CFGs)
    • Dependency parsing captures the binary asymmetric relations between words in a sentence
  • Type-logical semantics uses formal logic, such as lambda calculus and type theory, to model the composition of meaning
    • Lambda calculus allows for the representation of functions and the application of functions to arguments
    • Type theory specifies the semantic types of expressions and the rules for combining them
  • Montague Grammar is a formal system that combines syntactic analysis with model-theoretic semantics to derive the meaning of a sentence compositionally
  • Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) extends compositional semantics to handle discourse-level phenomena, such as anaphora and presupposition
  • Vector-based compositional models represent the meaning of words and phrases as vectors in a high-dimensional space and use mathematical operations (addition, multiplication) to combine them
  • Neural network approaches, such as recursive neural networks (RNNs) and transformers, learn compositional representations from data by encoding the structure and meaning of sentences

Challenges and Limitations

  • The Principle of Compositionality is an idealization and does not always hold in natural language
    • Idioms, metaphors, and other non-literal expressions have meanings that are not strictly compositional
    • Contextual factors, such as pragmatics and world knowledge, can influence the interpretation of expressions
  • Ambiguity and underspecification pose challenges for compositional analysis
    • Lexical ambiguity arises when a word has multiple meanings (bank as a financial institution or a river edge)
    • Structural ambiguity occurs when a sentence has multiple possible syntactic analyses ("I saw the man with the telescope")
  • Some linguistic phenomena, such as ellipsis and anaphora, involve dependencies that cross sentence boundaries and require discourse-level analysis
  • Compositionality does not account for the creative and dynamic aspects of language use, such as coercion, metonymy, and meaning shifts
  • Compositional models often struggle with capturing the fine-grained nuances of meaning, such as connotations, emotions, and social implications
  • Scaling compositional analysis to large, open-domain corpora remains a computational challenge, requiring efficient algorithms and resources

Applications in Natural Language Processing

  • Semantic parsing: Mapping natural language utterances to formal meaning representations, such as logical forms or SQL queries
  • Natural language inference: Determining the entailment or contradiction relations between sentences based on their compositional semantics
  • Sentiment analysis: Identifying the overall sentiment (positive, negative, neutral) of a text by composing the sentiments of its constituent expressions
  • Machine translation: Preserving the compositional structure and meaning of sentences across languages
  • Dialogue systems: Interpreting user utterances and generating appropriate responses based on their compositional meaning
  • Information retrieval: Matching queries with relevant documents by comparing their compositional semantic representations
  • Text summarization: Generating concise summaries of texts by identifying and composing the most important information
  • Creative language generation: Producing novel and coherent texts, such as stories or poems, by composing meaningful elements according to structural and semantic constraints

Further Reading and Resources

  • "Semantics in Generative Grammar" by Irene Heim and Angelika Kratzer: A comprehensive introduction to formal semantics and its integration with syntactic theory
  • "Semantic Role Labeling" by Martha Palmer, Daniel Gildea, and Nianwen Xue: A book-length treatment of the theory and practice of semantic role labeling
  • "Compositional Semantics: An Introduction to the Syntax/Semantics Interface" by Pauline Jacobson: A textbook on the principles and techniques of compositional semantic analysis
  • "Representation and Inference for Natural Language: A First Course in Computational Semantics" by Patrick Blackburn and Johan Bos: An introduction to computational semantics using logic-based methods
  • "The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality" edited by Markus Werning, Wolfram Hinzen, and Edouard Machery: A collection of articles on various aspects of compositionality from philosophical, linguistic, and cognitive perspectives
  • PropBank (https://propbank.github.io/): A corpus annotated with semantic roles, providing training data and resources for semantic role labeling
  • FrameNet (https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/): A lexical database of semantic frames and their roles, useful for frame-semantic analysis and role labeling
  • Universal Dependencies (https://universaldependencies.org/): A framework for cross-linguistically consistent grammatical annotation, including semantic roles and dependencies


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.