15.4 Decision Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision Making
4 min read•july 30, 2024
Decision Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision Making are crucial tools in Industrial Engineering. They help engineers tackle complex problems by breaking them down into manageable parts and considering multiple factors simultaneously.
These techniques allow for systematic evaluation of alternatives, considering uncertainties and trade-offs. By applying these methods, engineers can make more informed decisions, optimizing processes and outcomes in various industrial settings.
Decision problems in industrial engineering
Problem formulation and analysis
Top images from around the web for Problem formulation and analysis
Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Stakeholder Analysis Matrix Template | tools4dev View original
Is this image relevant?
Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Problem formulation and analysis
Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Stakeholder Analysis Matrix Template | tools4dev View original
Is this image relevant?
Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Decision problems involve selecting the best course of action from multiple alternatives based on specific criteria and constraints
- Process typically includes problem definition, identification of alternatives, determination of criteria, and evaluation of options
- Relevant criteria may include cost, quality, time, efficiency, safety, and environmental impact (consider a manufacturing process optimization)
- Alternatives represent different potential solutions or courses of action that address the defined problem (upgrading equipment, redesigning workflow, or implementing new technology)
- identifies and prioritizes criteria and alternatives, as different parties may have varying perspectives and interests
- Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) structures complex decision problems by breaking them down into hierarchies of criteria and sub-criteria
- Helps organize and simplify complex decisions
- Allows for consistent comparison of alternatives
Constraints and feasibility
- Constraints in decision problems limit the feasible set of alternatives and must be clearly defined to ensure realistic and implementable solutions
- Types of constraints in industrial engineering:
- Resource constraints (budget limitations, available manpower)
- Technical constraints (equipment capabilities, technological limitations)
- Regulatory constraints (safety standards, environmental regulations)
- Time constraints (project deadlines, production schedules)
- analysis ensures that proposed solutions meet all defined constraints
- examines the relationships between conflicting objectives and constraints
- Example: balancing production speed with quality control measures
Decision tree analysis for uncertainty
Structure and components
- graphically represent decision problems, illustrating the sequence of decisions and chance events over time
- Structure includes:
- Decision nodes (squares) represent points where a decision must be made
- Chance nodes (circles) represent points of uncertainty with multiple possible outcomes
- End nodes (triangles) represent final outcomes or payoffs
- Probabilities assigned to branches emanating from chance nodes represent the likelihood of different outcomes
- Payoffs associated with end nodes quantify the value of each possible outcome
Analysis techniques
- (EMV) calculated by multiplying the probability of each outcome by its corresponding payoff and summing these values
- Example: EMV of launching a new product = (0.6 × 20,000) = $52,000
- Rollback procedure solves decision trees by working backwards from the end nodes to the initial decision node
- Identifies the optimal decision path based on highest expected value
- Risk attitudes (risk-averse, risk-neutral, risk-seeking) influence decision-making under uncertainty
- Can be incorporated using utility functions to adjust payoffs
- in decision trees involves varying probabilities or payoffs to assess how changes affect the optimal decision path
- Helps identify critical uncertainties and robust decisions
Multi-criteria decision making
Basic MCDM techniques
- Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques address problems with conflicting and non-commensurate objectives
- Weighted Sum Model (WSM) assigns weights to criteria and calculates a total score for each alternative
- Simple and intuitive method for comparing alternatives
- Example: Selecting a location for a new warehouse based on cost, accessibility, and size
- Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) uses pairwise comparisons to determine criteria weights and alternative scores
- Incorporates consistency checks to ensure reliable judgments
- Useful for complex decisions with multiple levels of criteria
Advanced MCDM methods
- (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) evaluates alternatives based on their geometric distance from positive and negative ideal solutions
- Identifies the alternative closest to the ideal and farthest from the negative ideal
- method (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations) uses preference functions to compare alternatives pairwise across all criteria
- Allows for more nuanced comparison of alternatives
- minimizes deviations from predetermined goals for multiple objectives
- Useful when specific target values are known for each criterion
- incorporate fuzzy set theory to handle imprecise or uncertain information in the decision-making process
- Addresses the ambiguity often present in real-world decision problems
Sensitivity analysis for robustness
Types of sensitivity analysis
- Sensitivity analysis examines how changes in input parameters affect the final decision or ranking of alternatives
- One-way sensitivity analysis varies one parameter at a time while holding others constant to identify critical inputs
- Example: Analyzing how changes in material costs affect the choice of manufacturing process
- Two-way sensitivity analysis examines the simultaneous effect of changing two parameters on the decision outcome
- Useful for understanding interactions between variables
- used for probabilistic sensitivity analysis, incorporating uncertainty in multiple input parameters simultaneously
- Generates a distribution of possible outcomes based on input uncertainties
Interpretation and visualization
- Tornado diagrams visually represent the relative impact of different input parameters on the decision outcome
- Helps prioritize which variables have the most significant influence
- Threshold values indicate the point at which the optimal decision changes due to parameter variation
- Identifies critical values for key parameters
- Robust decision making focuses on identifying solutions that perform well across a wide range of potential future scenarios
- Emphasizes flexibility and adaptability in decision outcomes
- Sensitivity analysis results guide:
- Data collection efforts (focusing on most impactful parameters)
- Risk mitigation strategies (addressing key uncertainties)
- Contingency planning (preparing for potential changes in optimal decisions)
Key Terms to Review (24)
Analytical Hierarchy Process: The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a structured decision-making tool that helps individuals and organizations prioritize options based on multiple criteria. It simplifies complex decisions by breaking them down into a hierarchy of more manageable parts, allowing for the comparison of different alternatives in a systematic way. AHP is widely used in decision analysis and multi-criteria decision making to ensure that various factors are taken into account, leading to well-informed choices.
Bounded rationality: Bounded rationality is the concept that individuals, when making decisions, are limited by the information they have, cognitive biases, and time constraints. This idea suggests that rather than optimizing outcomes by evaluating every possible alternative, decision-makers settle for satisfactory solutions based on their limited understanding of the situation.
Consensus Building: Consensus building is a collaborative process aimed at reaching an agreement among a group of stakeholders or decision-makers. This approach seeks to integrate diverse perspectives and interests, ensuring that all voices are heard and considered, which ultimately fosters a sense of ownership and commitment to the decisions made. It is particularly valuable in complex situations where multiple criteria must be evaluated and balanced, leading to more sustainable and accepted outcomes.
Cost-benefit analysis: Cost-benefit analysis is a systematic process used to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of alternatives in order to determine the best approach for achieving benefits while minimizing costs. This method is essential in decision-making, as it helps identify the trade-offs involved and prioritize resource allocation based on expected returns. By comparing the projected costs and benefits, it becomes easier to understand the financial implications of different options and make informed choices.
Decision Trees: Decision trees are visual representations that help in making decisions by illustrating possible outcomes, risks, and rewards associated with different choices. They provide a clear framework to evaluate potential options and their consequences, making them especially useful in uncertain situations. By breaking down complex decisions into simpler parts, decision trees allow for systematic analysis of various scenarios, which can greatly aid in economic evaluations and multi-criteria decision-making processes.
Effectiveness: Effectiveness is the degree to which an action or decision achieves its intended outcome or goal. It focuses on the results produced by a particular approach, rather than merely the processes involved, highlighting the importance of making choices that lead to desired outcomes in decision-making contexts.
Expected Monetary Value: Expected Monetary Value (EMV) is a statistical technique used to evaluate potential outcomes of decisions by calculating the average value of possible scenarios, each weighted by its probability of occurrence. EMV helps decision-makers assess risks and make informed choices by combining uncertainty with financial outcomes. This concept is critical in decision analysis, where multiple criteria and uncertain variables are at play, allowing for a systematic approach to evaluate options based on their expected returns.
Feasibility: Feasibility refers to the assessment of the practicality and viability of a proposed project or solution, determining whether it can be implemented successfully within given constraints. This concept encompasses various dimensions including economic, technical, legal, operational, and scheduling factors that influence the likelihood of achieving desired outcomes. Understanding feasibility helps in decision-making processes where multiple criteria must be balanced to select the best course of action.
Fuzzy mcdm methods: Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are techniques that incorporate fuzzy logic into the evaluation and selection process of multiple conflicting criteria. These methods are particularly useful when dealing with uncertainty and imprecision in decision-making, allowing for a more nuanced analysis of alternatives based on qualitative and quantitative data. By leveraging fuzzy logic, these methods enhance the traditional MCDM approaches, providing a structured framework to manage the complexities of real-world decision problems.
Goal programming: Goal programming is a branch of multi-criteria decision making that extends linear programming to handle situations where multiple, often conflicting objectives must be satisfied. This method allows decision-makers to prioritize goals and find solutions that best meet these goals within given constraints, enabling a more comprehensive approach to problem-solving. By applying goal programming, organizations can effectively balance trade-offs between competing objectives, leading to more informed and beneficial outcomes.
Monte Carlo Simulation: Monte Carlo Simulation is a statistical technique used to model and analyze complex systems by generating random samples from probability distributions to understand the impact of risk and uncertainty on outcomes. This method allows for a comprehensive exploration of possible scenarios, making it a valuable tool in various fields, including systems engineering and decision-making processes.
Multi-objective optimization: Multi-objective optimization is a branch of mathematical optimization that involves simultaneously optimizing two or more conflicting objectives. This approach recognizes that many real-world problems require trade-offs between different goals, and seeks to find solutions that best satisfy these multiple criteria. It involves creating a Pareto front, which represents the set of optimal solutions where no objective can be improved without worsening another, making it essential for complex decision-making scenarios.
Operational Decisions: Operational decisions refer to the day-to-day choices and actions that are made to ensure the smooth functioning of an organization. These decisions are often tactical and focus on short-term objectives, involving the implementation of policies and procedures that support the strategic goals of a business. They encompass a range of activities from scheduling and resource allocation to process optimization, all aimed at enhancing efficiency and effectiveness within the organization.
Payoff matrix: A payoff matrix is a table that represents the potential outcomes of different decisions made by multiple decision-makers in a strategic situation. It helps visualize the possible payoffs or losses associated with each combination of choices, allowing for better analysis and understanding of the interactions between competing strategies.
Probability Distribution: A probability distribution is a mathematical function that provides the probabilities of occurrence of different possible outcomes in an experiment. It describes how the total probability is distributed among the possible values of a random variable, allowing for analysis and decision-making under uncertainty. This concept is crucial for evaluating potential outcomes and their associated risks, especially in scenarios requiring decision analysis and multi-criteria decision making.
Promethee: Promethee is a multi-criteria decision-making method that provides a structured framework for evaluating and prioritizing alternatives based on various criteria. It allows decision-makers to assess options in a comprehensive way, considering both quantitative and qualitative factors, which makes it particularly useful in complex scenarios where trade-offs are necessary. This approach supports effective decision-making by providing clear insights into how different options rank against each other.
Risk assessment: Risk assessment is the process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating potential risks that could negatively impact an organization or project. This process involves determining the likelihood of adverse events occurring and their potential consequences, helping to inform decision-making and prioritize actions to mitigate risks effectively. By systematically addressing risks, organizations can enhance safety, improve project outcomes, and streamline operations across various sectors.
Sensitivity Analysis: Sensitivity analysis is a method used to determine how different values of an independent variable will impact a particular dependent variable under a given set of assumptions. It helps in identifying how sensitive an outcome is to changes in input parameters, which is essential for making informed decisions and optimizing processes.
Stakeholder analysis: Stakeholder analysis is the process of identifying and assessing the influence and interests of individuals or groups who have a stake in a project or decision. This analysis helps to understand the impact stakeholders can have on the outcomes and can guide decision-making by aligning goals and managing expectations. It ensures that all relevant voices are heard, which is crucial for successful decision-making and multi-criteria decision making.
Strategic Decisions: Strategic decisions are long-term choices made by organizations that shape their overall direction, goals, and resource allocation. These decisions are critical as they influence the future of the organization and require careful analysis of various factors, including risks, opportunities, and stakeholder impacts. Effective strategic decision-making often involves evaluating multiple criteria to ensure alignment with the organization’s mission and vision.
TOPSIS: TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) is a multi-criteria decision-making method that ranks alternatives based on their geometric distance to an ideal solution. It combines both the best and worst possible scenarios to evaluate the options effectively, helping decision-makers select the most preferred alternative among a set of choices. This technique is especially useful in complex situations where multiple conflicting criteria must be considered, making it significant in areas like operations research and decision analysis.
Trade-off analysis: Trade-off analysis is a decision-making process that evaluates the benefits and drawbacks of different options to determine the best possible choice based on specific criteria. This method is crucial when resources are limited, as it helps prioritize objectives and find an optimal balance between competing interests. The analysis is particularly important when dealing with complex systems where multiple factors must be considered to achieve effective scheduling or decision-making outcomes.
Utility Theory: Utility theory is a framework used to understand how individuals make choices based on the satisfaction or pleasure derived from different outcomes. It connects the concept of preferences with decision-making processes, helping to model how people evaluate risks and rewards when faced with uncertainty or multiple criteria. This theory is crucial for analyzing decisions in economics and various fields, as it provides insight into how preferences influence choices.
Weighted scoring model: A weighted scoring model is a decision-making tool that uses a scoring system to evaluate and prioritize multiple options based on various criteria. Each criterion is assigned a weight reflecting its importance, and alternatives are scored against these criteria to determine the best overall choice. This model helps in making complex decisions by simplifying the comparison of different options with multiple attributes.