Nyāya epistemology forms the backbone of Indian logical thought. It introduces pramāṇa, the concept of valid knowledge, and outlines four key sources: perception, inference, comparison, and verbal testimony. These tools help us understand reality and pursue truth.
Each source of knowledge has its strengths and limitations. Nyāya's approach differs from other Indian schools, emphasizing logical analysis and debate. This system has greatly influenced Indian philosophy, shaping how we think about knowledge and reasoning.
Nyāya Epistemology Foundations
Concept of pramāṇa in Nyāya
Top images from around the web for Concept of pramāṇa in Nyāya Sām.ṃkhya’s Challenge to the Buddhist Claim of the Identity of a Pramān.ṇa and Its Result ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Yoga (philosophy) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Śabdapramāṇa : Hindu contributions to understanding the meaning and function of scripture ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Sām.ṃkhya’s Challenge to the Buddhist Claim of the Identity of a Pramān.ṇa and Its Result ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Yoga (philosophy) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Concept of pramāṇa in Nyāya Sām.ṃkhya’s Challenge to the Buddhist Claim of the Identity of a Pramān.ṇa and Its Result ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Yoga (philosophy) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Śabdapramāṇa : Hindu contributions to understanding the meaning and function of scripture ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Sām.ṃkhya’s Challenge to the Buddhist Claim of the Identity of a Pramān.ṇa and Its Result ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Yoga (philosophy) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Pramāṇa means valid knowledge or cognition derived from Sanskrit root "pra-mā" (to measure accurately)
Central concept in Indian epistemology forms foundation of Nyāya school of philosophy
Provides framework for knowledge acquisition establishes criteria for valid knowledge
Forms basis for logical reasoning and argumentation in philosophical discourse
Enables systematic investigation of reality and truth (moksha)
Distinguishes between valid cognition (pramā) and invalid cognition (apramā)
Four sources of valid knowledge
Pratyakṣa (Perception) involves direct sensory experience considered most reliable
Ordinary perception through five senses (sight, sound, touch, taste, smell)
Extraordinary perception includes yogic intuition and extrasensory perception
Anumāna (Inference) uses logical reasoning based on observed relationships
Three-step process: thesis (pratijna), reason (hetu), example (udaharana)
Example: "There is fire on the hill (thesis) because there is smoke (reason) like in a kitchen (example)"
Upamāna (Comparison) gains knowledge through similarity or analogy
Relies on previously known objects or concepts to understand new ones
Example: Learning about a new animal (gavaya) by comparing it to a known animal (cow)
Śabda (Verbal Testimony) acquires knowledge through reliable verbal or written sources
Includes Vedic scriptures and trustworthy individuals (apta)
Requires proper understanding of language and context
Strengths and limitations of pramāṇas
Pratyakṣa provides immediate and direct knowledge forms foundation for other pramāṇas
Limited by sensory illusions or defects (mirages, color blindness)
Restricted to present observable phenomena cannot perceive past or future
Anumāna extends knowledge beyond direct observation allows logical problem-solving
Dependent on accurate premises may lead to false conclusions if reasoning is flawed
Example: Misidentifying steam as smoke leads to incorrect inference of fire
Upamāna facilitates understanding of new concepts useful in everyday communication
May oversimplify complex ideas accuracy depends on validity of comparison
Example: Comparing atoms to solar systems oversimplifies atomic structure
Śabda allows transmission of knowledge across time and space provides access to specialized information
Reliability depends on credibility of source subject to misinterpretation
Example: Historical accounts may be biased or incomplete
Nyāya vs other Indian epistemologies
Similarities: shared emphasis on pramāṇas recognition of perception and inference
Cārvāka rejects all pramāṇas except perception emphasizes empirical knowledge
Buddhism generally accepts only perception and inference focuses on momentariness
Mīmāṃsā adds arthāpatti (postulation) and anupalabdhi (non-apprehension) emphasizes Vedic interpretation
Nyāya's unique features:
Emphasis on logical analysis and debate (vāda)
Detailed classification of fallacies (hetvābhāsas)
Systematic approach to epistemology and metaphysics
Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika combination:
Nyāya focuses on epistemology Vaiśeṣika on metaphysics
Complementary systems provide comprehensive philosophical framework
Influence: Nyāya's logical methods adopted by various traditions contributed to Indian logic development