Glossary

13.4 Performance Evaluation

3 min read•july 18, 2024

Evaluating portfolio performance is crucial for investors to assess their investment strategies. Key measures like the , , and help compare across different portfolios and benchmarks.

However, have limitations and can't predict future performance. faces challenges in separating skill from luck and accounting for . provide essential reference points for assessing relative performance.

Portfolio Performance Evaluation

Portfolio performance measures

Top images from around the web for Portfolio performance measures

1 of 1

Top images from around the web for Portfolio performance measures

1 of 1
  • Sharpe ratio measures risk-adjusted return of a portfolio by comparing to standard deviation
    • Calculated as: (Rp−Rf)/σp(R_p - R_f) / \sigma_p where RpR_p = portfolio return, RfR_f = risk-free rate, and σp\sigma_p = portfolio standard deviation
    • Higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance (, Berkshire Hathaway)
  • Treynor ratio measures risk-adjusted return relative to ()
    • Calculated as: (Rp−Rf)/βp(R_p - R_f) / \beta_p where RpR_p = portfolio return, RfR_f = risk-free rate, and βp\beta_p = portfolio beta
    • Higher Treynor ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to market risk (Apple, Amazon)
  • Jensen's alpha measures portfolio's excess return above the expected return based on its beta
    • Calculated as: αp=Rp−[Rf+βp(Rm−Rf)]\alpha_p = R_p - [R_f + \beta_p(R_m - R_f)] where αp\alpha_p = Jensen's alpha, RpR_p = portfolio return, RfR_f = risk-free rate, βp\beta_p = portfolio beta, and RmR_m = market return
    • Positive alpha indicates outperformance, while negative alpha indicates underperformance (Fidelity Magellan Fund, PIMCO Total Return Fund)

Limitations of historical returns

  • Past performance does not guarantee future results as market conditions and investment strategies may change over time
  • Historical data may not capture all relevant risk factors that could impact future returns
  • can lead to overestimation of average fund performance as failed or merged funds are often excluded from historical data
  • Short-term performance can be heavily influenced by luck or market timing rather than skill (dotcom bubble, 2008 financial crisis)

Role of benchmark portfolios

  • Benchmark portfolios serve as a reference point for evaluating a portfolio's performance
  • Commonly used benchmarks include (S&P 500, ), style-specific indices (, ), and custom benchmarks tailored to a portfolio's investment mandate
  • Benchmarks should be relevant to the portfolio's investment style and objectives, investable and replicable, and widely recognized and accepted by investors
  • Performance metrics like alpha and are often calculated relative to a benchmark to assess outperformance or deviation from the benchmark

Challenges in active management evaluation

  • Separating skill from luck is difficult as short-term outperformance may be due to chance rather than investment skill
    • Requires long-term track record and statistical significance to assess skill
  • Accounting for style drift when portfolio managers deviate from their stated investment style over time
    • Makes it difficult to compare performance to a static benchmark
  • Evaluating risk-adjusted returns is crucial as active managers may take on additional risk to generate higher returns
    • Risk-adjusted metrics (Sharpe ratio, information ratio) are needed to assess risk-return tradeoff
  • Comparing performance across different market environments as manager skill may be more evident in certain conditions (high volatility, market downturns)
    • Evaluating performance across various market cycles provides a more comprehensive assessment

Key Terms to Review (18)

Active Management Evaluation: Active management evaluation refers to the assessment process of investment strategies that involve actively selecting securities to outperform a benchmark index. This approach contrasts with passive management, where investments are made in accordance with a market index without attempting to outperform it. Effective evaluation examines performance relative to risk taken and includes metrics such as alpha and beta, which provide insights into how well the active management strategy is performing.
Benchmark portfolios: Benchmark portfolios are standard portfolios used to measure the performance of investment managers or funds against a specific market or segment. They serve as a reference point, allowing investors to compare the returns of their investments with those of the benchmark to assess performance and risk-adjusted returns.
Beta: Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility in relation to the overall market, indicating how much the stock's price tends to move when the market moves. A beta greater than 1 signifies that the stock is more volatile than the market, while a beta less than 1 indicates lower volatility. Understanding beta helps investors assess risk and make informed decisions about portfolio management and investment strategies.
Excess Return: Excess return refers to the return of an investment above the risk-free rate or the benchmark return. It is a critical concept in evaluating investment performance, helping to assess whether an investment has generated additional returns due to risk-taking or skill. This measure is often used in performance evaluation to determine how well an investment has performed compared to a standard or expected return, allowing investors to make informed decisions about asset allocation and portfolio management.
Historical returns: Historical returns refer to the actual gains or losses made on an investment over a specific period in the past, expressed as a percentage of the initial investment. Understanding historical returns is crucial for evaluating an investment's performance and predicting future potential, as they provide insight into how assets have performed under various market conditions and can help assess risk and return trade-offs.
Jensen's Alpha: Jensen's Alpha is a measure of the excess return generated by an investment portfolio relative to its expected return, based on its level of systematic risk as indicated by the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). It helps in assessing a manager's ability to generate returns above what would be predicted by the market, providing insights into the performance of a portfolio in the context of risk-adjusted returns.
Market Indices: Market indices are statistical measures that represent the performance of a specific group of stocks, bonds, or other assets in a financial market. They provide a snapshot of market trends and are often used as benchmarks for evaluating the performance of investment portfolios or the overall market. Market indices help investors understand the broader economic landscape and can indicate market sentiment and investment opportunities.
MSCI Emerging Markets: MSCI Emerging Markets is a stock market index that represents large and mid-cap companies across 26 emerging market countries. This index is widely used by investors to gauge the performance of equities in these economies, serving as a benchmark for funds that invest in emerging markets. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index captures a diverse range of sectors and industries, providing insights into the economic growth potential and investment opportunities within these developing regions.
MSCI World: The MSCI World Index is a stock market index that measures the performance of large and mid-cap companies across 23 developed markets worldwide. It serves as a benchmark for global equity markets and is widely used by investors to gauge overall market performance, track investment strategies, and compare the performance of portfolios against a comprehensive global standard.
Risk-adjusted returns: Risk-adjusted returns refer to the amount of profit an investment generates relative to the level of risk taken to achieve that profit. This concept helps investors compare the performance of various investments by taking into account the risk involved, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation of potential returns. By using metrics like the Sharpe ratio or Treynor ratio, investors can determine whether an investment is providing adequate returns for its associated risk level.
Russell 1000 Growth: The Russell 1000 Growth is a stock market index that measures the performance of the growth segment of the Russell 1000 Index, which includes the 1,000 largest publicly traded companies in the U.S. by market capitalization. This index focuses on companies with higher growth potential, usually characterized by above-average earnings growth and strong momentum in their stock prices. It serves as a benchmark for assessing investment performance, particularly for portfolios that emphasize growth investing.
S&P 500: The S&P 500, or Standard & Poor's 500, is a stock market index that measures the stock performance of 500 large companies listed on stock exchanges in the United States. This index is widely regarded as one of the best representations of the U.S. stock market and economy, as it encompasses a diverse range of industries and serves as a benchmark for investment performance.
Sharpe Ratio: The Sharpe Ratio is a measure that helps investors understand the return of an investment compared to its risk. It is calculated by taking the difference between the investment's return and the risk-free rate, then dividing that by the investment's standard deviation. This ratio is useful in assessing risk-adjusted performance and helps in making informed investment decisions by allowing comparisons across different assets and portfolios.
Style drift: Style drift refers to the tendency of a mutual fund or investment manager to deviate from its stated investment style or strategy over time. This can occur when fund managers make decisions that lead the fund to invest in different asset classes or sectors than originally intended, which may affect performance evaluation and investor expectations.
Survivorship Bias: Survivorship bias refers to the logical error of focusing on the people or things that passed a selection process while overlooking those that did not, often leading to overly optimistic beliefs. This bias is particularly important in performance evaluation, as it can skew analysis by only considering successful entities and ignoring failures, resulting in incomplete and misleading conclusions about performance and risk.
Systematic risk: Systematic risk refers to the inherent risk that affects an entire market or a large segment of the market, which cannot be mitigated through diversification. This type of risk is often linked to macroeconomic factors such as changes in interest rates, inflation, and political instability, impacting all investments across the board.
Tracking Error: Tracking error is a measure of how closely a portfolio follows the index to which it is benchmarked. It quantifies the deviation of the portfolio's returns from the index's returns, reflecting the degree of active management and investment strategy. A lower tracking error indicates that the portfolio closely mirrors the index, while a higher tracking error suggests a larger divergence, which can result from different asset selections or management styles.
Treynor Ratio: The Treynor Ratio is a measure of a portfolio's risk-adjusted return, calculated by taking the difference between the portfolio's return and the risk-free rate, then dividing by the portfolio's beta. This ratio helps investors understand how much excess return they are receiving for each unit of risk taken, with beta representing the sensitivity of the portfolio's returns to market movements. It is particularly useful for evaluating performance in the context of optimal portfolios and assessing how well a manager is performing relative to systematic risk.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide