3.3 Post-Processual Archaeology
3 min read•july 22, 2024
Post-processual archaeology emerged in the 1980s as a critical response to processual archaeology. It emphasizes individuals, symbolism, and context, rejecting the notion of a single objective truth in favor of multiple interpretations.
This approach focuses on individual , symbolism in material culture, and historical context. While it offers a nuanced understanding of the past, it can lead to relativism and challenges in testing hypotheses.
Post-Processual Archaeology
Development of post-processual archaeology
Top images from around the web for Development of post-processual archaeology
After Virtual Archaeology. Summary. Beale and Reilly. Internet Archaeol. 44. View original
Is this image relevant?
Internet Archaeol. 31. Review of Archaeological Methods [Website] View original
Is this image relevant?
Internet Archaeol. 40. Bonacchi and Moshenska. Where does digital public archaeology sit within ... View original
Is this image relevant?
After Virtual Archaeology. Summary. Beale and Reilly. Internet Archaeol. 44. View original
Is this image relevant?
Internet Archaeol. 31. Review of Archaeological Methods [Website] View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Development of post-processual archaeology
After Virtual Archaeology. Summary. Beale and Reilly. Internet Archaeol. 44. View original
Is this image relevant?
Internet Archaeol. 31. Review of Archaeological Methods [Website] View original
Is this image relevant?
Internet Archaeol. 40. Bonacchi and Moshenska. Where does digital public archaeology sit within ... View original
Is this image relevant?
After Virtual Archaeology. Summary. Beale and Reilly. Internet Archaeol. 44. View original
Is this image relevant?
Internet Archaeol. 31. Review of Archaeological Methods [Website] View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Emerged in the 1980s as a critical response to the limitations and assumptions of processual archaeology
- Processual archaeology emphasized systems, processes, and the search for general laws governing human behavior and cultural change
- Post-processual archaeology highlighted the importance of individuals, symbolism, and historical and cultural context in shaping the archaeological record
- Critiqued processual archaeology's heavy reliance on scientific methods and claims of objectivity
- Argued that archaeology is inherently subjective and shaped by the archaeologist's own biases, theoretical perspectives, and cultural background
- Emphasized the role of interpretation in archaeological practice and the existence of multiple, equally valid interpretations of the past
- Rejected the notion of a single, objective truth in archaeological interpretations
- Embraced the idea of multivocality, or the inclusion of diverse voices and perspectives in archaeological narratives (indigenous communities, marginalized groups)
- Drew from a wide range of disciplines and theoretical frameworks to inform archaeological interpretations
- Incorporated ideas from anthropology, sociology, philosophy, and literary theory
- Engaged with theories such as structuralism, post-structuralism, hermeneutics, and Marxism
Emphasis in post-processual interpretations
- Individual agency
- Focuses on the active role of individuals in shaping their social, cultural, and material worlds
- Recognizes that people in the past had their own motivations, beliefs, and choices that influenced their actions and interactions
- Emphasizes the ways in which individuals create, manipulate, and negotiate material culture to express identity, status, and social relationships (personal adornment, architecture)
- Symbolism
- Explores the symbolic and ideological dimensions of material culture and the built environment
- Considers how artifacts, sites, and landscapes are imbued with cultural meanings and used to communicate social messages (religious iconography, monumental architecture)
- Recognizes that the meaning and significance of objects can vary depending on the specific cultural context and the individuals involved
- Context
- Stresses the importance of situating archaeological remains within their specific historical, social, and cultural contexts
- Argues that the meaning and significance of artifacts and sites can only be fully understood when considered in relation to the broader cultural milieu in which they were produced and used
- Rejects the search for universal laws and generalizations in favor of more particularistic and historically contingent interpretations (regional variation, cultural specificity)
Strengths vs weaknesses of post-processual approaches
- Strengths
- Encourages a more nuanced, contextualized, and multifaceted understanding of the past
- Recognizes the complexity and diversity of past societies and the individuals who comprised them
- Incorporates a wider range of theoretical perspectives and interdisciplinary approaches, enriching archaeological interpretations
- Emphasizes the role of interpretation in archaeological practice and the importance of acknowledging multiple viewpoints and alternative narratives
- Weaknesses
- Can lead to a form of relativism in which all interpretations are considered equally valid, regardless of their empirical basis or logical coherence
- May prioritize individual agency and symbolic meaning at the expense of considering larger-scale processes, structures, and environmental factors
- Can be difficult to operationalize and test hypotheses derived from post-processual theories, as they often rely on subjective and contextual factors
- May rely heavily on the archaeologist's own interpretations and be less amenable to scientific testing, replication, and falsification (experimental archaeology, quantitative methods)
Key Terms to Review (18)
Agency: Agency refers to the capacity of individuals or groups to act independently and make their own choices, often shaping their own experiences and environments. In archaeology, this concept emphasizes the role of human actors in historical processes, suggesting that people are not just passive participants but active agents who influence cultural practices, social structures, and the interpretation of artifacts.
çatalhöyük: çatalhöyük is an archaeological site in modern-day Turkey that dates back to around 7500 BC, known for its densely packed mudbrick houses and rich cultural artifacts. This site offers crucial insights into early human settlements, social organization, and the shift from nomadic lifestyles to more permanent residences.
Contextuality: Contextuality refers to the significance of context in understanding and interpreting archaeological data, emphasizing that artifacts and cultural practices must be analyzed within their specific social, historical, and environmental frameworks. This perspective highlights that meaning is derived not only from the objects themselves but also from the relationships, interactions, and conditions surrounding them, leading to a deeper comprehension of past human behavior and societies.
Critical Archaeology: Critical archaeology is an approach that examines the social and political contexts in which archaeological knowledge is produced, emphasizing the influence of power dynamics on interpretations of the past. It seeks to uncover the biases that may shape archaeological narratives, advocating for a more inclusive understanding of history by considering marginalized voices and perspectives. This approach encourages a reflection on how archaeology can be used both to challenge and reinforce existing power structures.
Cultural Relativism: Cultural relativism is the concept that a person's beliefs and practices should be understood based on that person's own culture, rather than be judged against the criteria of another culture. This perspective emphasizes understanding cultural differences and promotes the idea that no culture is superior to another, which is especially important in examining human behavior and societal norms.
Emphasis on Subjective Experience: Emphasis on subjective experience refers to the focus on individual perspectives, feelings, and interpretations in understanding human behavior and cultural practices. This approach values personal narratives and lived experiences as crucial to interpreting archaeological findings, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of past societies beyond mere data analysis.
Hegemony: Hegemony refers to the dominance or leadership of one group or ideology over others, often maintained through cultural, social, or economic means rather than direct force. This concept is crucial in understanding how power dynamics shape societies, influencing everything from cultural practices to social norms and political structures. In various contexts, hegemony illustrates how certain groups can create and maintain control through consent rather than coercion, making it a central idea in post-Processual archaeology.
Ian Hodder: Ian Hodder is a prominent British archaeologist known for his contributions to post-processual archaeology, which emphasizes the subjective interpretation of archaeological data and the importance of understanding cultural contexts. His work has significantly influenced how archaeologists approach the interpretation of artifacts and sites, highlighting the need to consider the perspectives of contemporary people and historical narratives.
Interpretive Archaeology: Interpretive archaeology is an approach that emphasizes understanding the meanings and cultural contexts of past human behaviors and artifacts, rather than solely focusing on their physical characteristics or functional aspects. This perspective prioritizes the subjective interpretations of archaeologists and recognizes that these interpretations can vary based on cultural, historical, and social influences. It highlights the importance of narratives, symbolism, and the lived experiences of people in the past.
Marginalization: Marginalization refers to the process through which certain groups or individuals are pushed to the edges of society, resulting in limited access to resources, opportunities, and participation in decision-making. This term highlights issues of power dynamics, inequality, and social exclusion, often affecting minority or disadvantaged communities, and emphasizes the need to consider these perspectives in archaeological interpretations.
Material Agency: Material agency refers to the ability of objects and materials to influence human behavior and social interactions. In the context of archaeology, this concept highlights how artifacts and structures are not just passive items but actively shape and are shaped by human actions and cultural contexts. This perspective emphasizes the role of material culture in understanding past societies and their complexities.
Michael Shanks: Michael Shanks is a prominent figure in archaeology, known for his contributions to post-processual theory. He emphasizes the importance of social context and the subjective experiences of individuals in understanding the past, challenging traditional views that prioritize objectivity and scientific methods. His work encourages archaeologists to consider how cultural meanings and identities shape archaeological interpretation.
Multi-vocality: Multi-vocality refers to the presence of multiple voices, perspectives, and interpretations within a single context, particularly in the analysis and representation of cultural heritage. This concept emphasizes the importance of acknowledging diverse viewpoints, especially from marginalized or previously unheard groups, to create a more holistic understanding of the past. In archaeology, multi-vocality encourages the inclusion of varied narratives and meanings in interpreting archaeological findings, allowing for a richer and more complex picture of historical societies.
Narrative analysis: Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method that focuses on the stories individuals tell and the meanings behind those stories. It emphasizes understanding how narratives shape and reflect human experiences, cultural contexts, and social realities. By examining these narratives, researchers can uncover insights about identity, power dynamics, and cultural beliefs, making it a vital tool in post-processual archaeology for interpreting the past.
Reflexivity: Reflexivity refers to the process of reflecting on one's own biases, beliefs, and positionality, and understanding how these factors influence the interpretation of data and the archaeological narrative. This concept emphasizes the importance of self-awareness among researchers, encouraging them to acknowledge how their perspectives shape their work and the meanings they derive from the past. In archaeology, reflexivity plays a critical role in challenging traditional narratives and promotes a more nuanced understanding of cultural contexts.
Rejection of scientific objectivity: The rejection of scientific objectivity is the critique that traditional archaeological methods, which claim to be neutral and unbiased, often overlook the subjective influences of social, cultural, and political contexts in interpreting the past. This perspective emphasizes that knowledge and interpretations in archaeology are shaped by individual experiences and societal frameworks rather than existing in a vacuum of neutrality.
Symbolic interpretation: Symbolic interpretation refers to the analysis of cultural artifacts and practices to uncover their meanings and the messages they convey within a specific social context. This approach focuses on how symbols, imagery, and narratives reflect the beliefs, values, and identities of past societies. It emphasizes that understanding artifacts is not just about their physical attributes but also about the meanings they hold for the people who created and used them.
The Rise of Social Complexity: The rise of social complexity refers to the development of increasingly intricate social structures and relationships within human societies, often marked by the emergence of hierarchical systems, specialization of labor, and centralized governance. This phenomenon reflects a shift from small, egalitarian groups to larger, more stratified societies where power dynamics and resource distribution become more pronounced.