2.2 Bill of Rights

The Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791, protects individual liberties from government overreach. Influenced by English precedent, it arose from debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the balance of power between central government and individual rights.

The first ten amendments guarantee fundamental freedoms like speech, religion, and due process. Over time, most of these rights have been incorporated to apply to state governments, expanding civil liberties protections for all Americans.

Origins of Bill of Rights

• The Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791, consists of the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution and serves to protect individual liberties from government overreach
• Influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689, which established limits on the power of the monarchy and guaranteed certain rights to citizens
• Arose from the debate between Federalists, who supported a strong central government, and Anti-Federalists, who feared that a powerful federal government would infringe upon individual rights

English influence on rights

Top images from around the web for English influence on rights

• 

  B21 Bill of Rights 5-6 | howard_morland | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bill of Rights - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Magna Carta, Mayflower Compact, English Bill of Rights--Why They Matter. View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  B21 Bill of Rights 5-6 | howard_morland | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bill of Rights - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for English influence on rights

• 

  B21 Bill of Rights 5-6 | howard_morland | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bill of Rights - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Magna Carta, Mayflower Compact, English Bill of Rights--Why They Matter. View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  B21 Bill of Rights 5-6 | howard_morland | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bill of Rights - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• The English Bill of Rights, enacted after the Glorious Revolution, served as a model for the American Bill of Rights
• Guaranteed rights such as freedom of speech in Parliament, the right to petition the government, and protection against cruel and unusual punishment
• Established the principle of limited government and the idea that individual rights should be protected from government infringement

Federalists vs Anti-Federalists

• Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, argued for a strong central government to maintain order and stability
• Anti-Federalists, including Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry, feared that a powerful federal government would threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty
• To secure ratification of the Constitution, Federalists agreed to add a Bill of Rights to address Anti-Federalist concerns and protect individual freedoms

First Amendment protections

• The First Amendment guarantees several fundamental freedoms essential to a democratic society, including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition
• These rights are considered the bedrock of American democracy and have been vigorously defended and interpreted by the courts throughout history
• The amendment reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"

Freedom of religion

• The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from establishing an official religion or favoring one religion over another
• The Free Exercise Clause protects an individual's right to practice their religion without government interference
• The Supreme Court has interpreted these clauses to require a separation of church and state (Engel v. Vitale) while also protecting religious practices from unnecessary government regulation (Wisconsin v. Yoder)

Freedom of speech

• Protects the right to express opinions and ideas without government censorship or punishment
• Includes various forms of expression, such as verbal speech, written works, symbolic speech (Texas v. Johnson), and artistic expression
• The Supreme Court has recognized some limitations on free speech, such as defamation, obscenity, and speech that incites imminent lawless action (Brandenburg v. Ohio)

Freedom of the press

• Ensures that the news media can report on matters of public interest without government interference or censorship
• Protects the right to publish and distribute information, even if critical of the government or public officials (New York Times Co. v. United States)
• Like freedom of speech, this right is subject to certain limitations, such as laws against libel and the publication of classified information that could harm national security

Right to assemble

• Protects the right to gather peacefully for various purposes, such as protests, rallies, and demonstrations
• Allows individuals to come together and express their collective opinions and grievances without fear of government retaliation
• The government may place reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on assemblies to maintain public safety and order (Ward v. Rock Against Racism)

Right to petition government

• Guarantees the right to make formal requests or complaints to the government without fear of punishment or reprisal
• Includes the right to file lawsuits against the government, lobby elected officials, and circulate petitions for signatures
• This right is essential for citizens to hold their government accountable and seek redress for grievances

Second Amendment

• The Second Amendment reads, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
• This amendment has been the subject of much debate and interpretation, with disagreements over whether it protects an individual right to own firearms or a collective right tied to militia service
• The Supreme Court has ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess firearms for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense (District of Columbia v. Heller)

Right to bear arms

• The right to bear arms is often interpreted as the individual right to own and carry firearms
• Proponents argue that this right is essential for personal protection, hunting, and as a check against government tyranny
• Critics argue for stronger gun control measures, citing concerns about public safety, crime, and the potential for mass shootings

Militias in early America

• In the early days of the United States, militias were seen as essential for national defense and as a safeguard against a standing army that could potentially threaten liberty
• Militias were composed of ordinary citizens who would bear arms and train together to be ready to defend their communities and states when needed
• Today, the role of militias has largely been replaced by the National Guard and professional military forces

Fourth Amendment privacy

• The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, ensuring the right to privacy and security in one's person, home, papers, and effects
• It reads, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized"
• This amendment is crucial in protecting citizens from arbitrary government intrusion and maintaining the rule of law

Protection against unreasonable search

• The Fourth Amendment prohibits the government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures of individuals, their homes, and their property
• Reasonableness is determined by balancing the government's interest in conducting the search against the individual's expectation of privacy (Katz v. United States)
• In general, searches and seizures are considered reasonable if they are conducted with a warrant, based on probable cause, or fall under a recognized exception to the warrant requirement (exigent circumstances, plain view, etc.)

Warrant requirements

• To obtain a warrant, law enforcement must demonstrate probable cause to a neutral magistrate, supported by oath or affirmation
• The warrant must specifically describe the place to be searched and the persons or items to be seized, preventing overly broad or vague searches (particularity requirement)
• Warrantless searches are presumed unreasonable unless they fall under a recognized exception, such as consent, search incident to arrest, or the motor vehicle exception (Carroll v. United States)

Fifth Amendment rights

• The Fifth Amendment provides several important protections for individuals in the criminal justice system, including the right to a grand jury, protection against double jeopardy, the right against self-incrimination, and the guarantee of due process
• It reads, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation"
• These rights are essential for ensuring fairness and preventing government abuse in the criminal justice process

Grand jury requirement

• In federal criminal cases, a grand jury must first issue an indictment before a person can be tried for a serious crime (felony)
• The grand jury, composed of citizens, hears evidence presented by the prosecutor and determines whether there is probable cause to believe the accused committed the crime
• This requirement serves as a check on the government's power to bring criminal charges and helps prevent baseless or politically motivated prosecutions

Double jeopardy protection

• The Fifth Amendment prohibits the government from prosecuting an individual more than once for the same offense (double jeopardy)
• This protection applies when a person has been acquitted, convicted, or punished for a crime, preventing the government from repeatedly trying a person until a desired outcome is achieved
• Double jeopardy does not apply if the first trial ended in a mistrial or if the defendant is being tried by different sovereigns (state and federal governments) for the same conduct (Dual Sovereignty Doctrine)

Right against self-incrimination

• Also known as the "right to remain silent," this provision protects individuals from being compelled to testify against themselves in criminal cases
• This right is closely associated with the Miranda warnings, which inform suspects of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning (Miranda v. Arizona)
• The right against self-incrimination applies only to testimonial evidence and does not extend to physical evidence, such as blood samples or fingerprints (Schmerber v. California)

Due process of law

• The Fifth Amendment guarantees that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law
• Due process requires that the government follow fair procedures and respect individual rights when making decisions that affect a person's interests
• Substantive due process protects certain fundamental rights from government interference (Roe v. Wade), while procedural due process ensures that the government follows fair procedures when depriving someone of life, liberty, or property (Mathews v. Eldridge)

Sixth Amendment trial rights

• The Sixth Amendment ensures several essential rights for defendants in criminal prosecutions, aiming to provide a fair and impartial trial
• It reads, "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence"
• These rights work together to protect the accused and maintain the integrity of the criminal justice system

Right to speedy trial

• Defendants have the right to a speedy trial to prevent prolonged pretrial detention and to ensure that evidence and witnesses remain available
• The Supreme Court has identified four factors to consider when determining whether a speedy trial violation has occurred: length of delay, reason for delay, defendant's assertion of the right, and prejudice to the defendant (Barker v. Wingo)
• Speedy trial rights also help maintain public confidence in the criminal justice system by avoiding the appearance of impropriety or unfairness

Right to impartial jury

• Criminal defendants have the right to be tried by an impartial jury of their peers, drawn from the state and district where the crime was committed
• Impartiality means that jurors should be unbiased and decide the case based on the evidence presented, without prejudice or preconceived notions of guilt
• Voir dire, the process of questioning potential jurors, helps ensure impartiality by allowing attorneys to identify and remove jurors who may be biased (Batson v. Kentucky)

Right to be informed of accusations

• The Sixth Amendment requires that defendants be informed of the nature and cause of the accusations against them
• This right ensures that the accused has sufficient notice of the charges to prepare a defense and avoid being tried for a crime different from the one charged
• The charging document (indictment or information) must contain the essential elements of the crime and provide enough factual detail to allow the defendant to mount a defense

Right to confront witnesses

• Defendants have the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses testifying against them, ensuring the reliability of the evidence and allowing the accused to challenge the credibility of witnesses
• This right is known as the Confrontation Clause and applies to both in-court testimony and out-of-court statements offered for their truth (Crawford v. Washington)
• In some cases, the right to confrontation may yield to other competing interests, such as protecting child witnesses from trauma (Maryland v. Craig)

Right to legal counsel

• The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to have the assistance of counsel for one's defense in criminal prosecutions
• This right applies not only at trial but also during critical stages of the proceedings, such as post-arrest interrogation (Massiah v. United States) and sentencing (Mempa v. Rhay)
• For indigent defendants, the government must appoint an attorney to represent them (Gideon v. Wainwright), ensuring that the right to counsel is not dependent on a person's ability to pay

Eighth Amendment

• The Eighth Amendment prohibits the government from imposing excessive bail, excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishments
• It reads, "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted"
• This amendment reflects the principle that even those convicted of crimes have the right to be treated humanely and with dignity

Prohibition of excessive bail

• Bail is money or property pledged to the court to ensure that a defendant will appear for trial
• The Eighth Amendment prohibits the government from setting bail at an amount higher than reasonably necessary to ensure the defendant's appearance
• The Supreme Court has held that bail should not be used as a means of punishing the accused before trial or as a way to keep them detained (United States v. Salerno)

Prohibition of cruel punishment

• The Eighth Amendment prohibits the government from inflicting cruel and unusual punishments, reflecting evolving standards of decency
• The Supreme Court has interpreted this clause to prohibit punishments that are grossly disproportionate to the offense (Solem v. Helm) or that involve the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain (Estelle v. Gamble)
• The Court has also held that the death penalty, as currently administered, does not violate the Eighth Amendment (Gregg v. Georgia), but it has placed limitations on its use, such as prohibiting the execution of the intellectually disabled (Atkins v. Virginia) and juveniles (Roper v. Simmons)

Ninth Amendment

• The Ninth Amendment addresses concerns that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution might be interpreted as denying or disparaging other rights retained by the people
• It reads, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people"
• This amendment affirms that the Bill of Rights is not an exhaustive list of individual rights and that other fundamental rights, not specifically mentioned, are still protected

Protection of unenumerated rights

• The Ninth Amendment recognizes that there are fundamental rights not explicitly listed in the Constitution that are nonetheless protected from government infringement
• These unenumerated rights are often derived from the concept of liberty, natural rights, or the traditions and collective conscience of the people
• The Supreme Court has relied on the Ninth Amendment, in conjunction with other amendments, to recognize certain implied fundamental rights, such as the right to privacy (Griswold v. Connecticut) and the right to marry (Obergefell v. Hodges)

Tenth Amendment

• The Tenth Amendment addresses the division of powers between the federal government and the states, affirming the principle of federalism
• It reads, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"
• This amendment emphasizes that the federal government possesses only those powers granted to it by the Constitution, while all other powers are reserved for the states or the people

Powers reserved to states

• The Tenth Amendment recognizes that states retain significant powers not delegated to the federal government, allowing them to act as laboratories of democracy and tailor policies to local needs
• These reserved powers include the authority to establish and enforce laws related to public health, safety, welfare, and morality (police powers)
• The Supreme Court has used the Tenth Amendment to strike down federal laws that commandeer state officials (Printz v. United States) or that exceed the scope of Congress's enumerated powers (United States v. Lopez)

Powers reserved to people

• The Tenth Amendment also acknowledges that the people retain powers not delegated to either the federal or state governments
• This provision underscores the principle of popular sovereignty, recognizing that ultimate power resides with the people, who can delegate or reserve powers through the Constitution and democratic processes
• The reserved powers of the people include the right to amend the Constitution (Article V) and the right to engage in political activities, such as voting and petitioning the government

Incorporation of Bill of Rights

• Originally, the Bill of Rights only applied to the federal government, not to the states
• Through the process of selective incorporation, the Supreme Court has gradually applied most of the Bill of Rights protections to the states using the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
• Incorporation has greatly expanded the scope of individual rights and has made the federal courts the primary guardians of civil liberties

Application to state governments

• The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, includes the Due Process Clause, which prohibits states from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law
• The Supreme Court has interpreted this clause to incorporate many of the Bill of Rights protections against the states, making them applicable to state and local governments
• Incorporation has been a gradual process, with the Court selectively applying individual rights to the states on a case-by-case basis (Gitlow v. New York, Near v. Minnesota)

Selective vs total incorporation

• Selective incorporation refers to the Supreme Court's approach of applying specific Bill of Rights protections to the states one at a time, based on whether the right is fundamental to the American scheme of ordered liberty (Palko v. Connecticut)
• In contrast, total incorporation, a theory advocated by Justice Hugo Black, would have applied the entire Bill of Rights to the states at once
• While