History of Ancient Philosophy

🙇🏽‍♀️History of Ancient Philosophy Unit 8 – Aristotle's Logic: The Organon

Aristotle's Logic: The Organon is a foundational work in Western philosophy. It introduces a systematic approach to reasoning, establishing key concepts like syllogisms, propositions, and categories that shaped logical thinking for centuries. The Organon consists of six books covering different aspects of logic. From the Categories to Sophistical Refutations, Aristotle's work laid the groundwork for formal logic and scientific methodology, influencing thinkers across cultures and time periods.

Who Was Aristotle?

  • Greek philosopher and polymath born in 384 BCE in Stagira, Chalcidice
  • Studied under Plato at the Academy in Athens for nearly 20 years
  • Established his own school, the Lyceum, in Athens around 335 BCE
  • Tutored Alexander the Great from 343 to 336 BCE
  • Wrote extensively on various subjects including logic, metaphysics, ethics, biology, and politics
  • Developed a comprehensive system of deductive reasoning known as syllogistic logic
  • Considered one of the most influential thinkers in Western philosophy and science

The Organon: An Overview

  • Collection of six works by Aristotle on logic and reasoning
  • The term "Organon" means "instrument" or "tool" in Greek
  • Consists of the Categories, On Interpretation, Prior Analytics, Posterior Analytics, Topics, and Sophistical Refutations
  • Provides a systematic approach to argumentation and deductive reasoning
  • Introduces key concepts such as syllogisms, propositions, and fallacies
  • Establishes the foundation for formal logic and scientific methodology
  • Remained the dominant system of logic in the Western world until the development of modern formal logic in the 19th century

Key Concepts in Aristotelian Logic

  • Syllogism: a form of deductive reasoning consisting of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion
  • Proposition: a statement that is either true or false
  • Term: the subject or predicate of a proposition
  • Categorical proposition: a proposition that asserts or denies something about a subject
    • Four types: universal affirmative (All S is P), universal negative (No S is P), particular affirmative (Some S is P), and particular negative (Some S is not P)
  • Inference: the process of deriving a conclusion from premises
  • Validity: a property of arguments in which the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises
  • Soundness: a property of arguments that are both valid and have true premises

The Categories

  • First book of the Organon, dealing with the classification of terms
  • Identifies ten categories or predicates that can be asserted of a subject
    • Substance (e.g., man, horse)
    • Quantity (e.g., two cubits long)
    • Quality (e.g., white, grammatical)
    • Relation (e.g., double, half)
    • Place (e.g., in the Lyceum, in the market-place)
    • Time (e.g., yesterday, last year)
    • Position (e.g., is lying, is sitting)
    • State (e.g., has shoes on, is armed)
    • Action (e.g., cutting, burning)
    • Affection (e.g., being cut, being burned)
  • Distinguishes between substance (primary essence) and the other nine categories (accidents)
  • Provides a framework for analyzing the logical structure of propositions

On Interpretation

  • Second book of the Organon, focusing on propositions and their relationships
  • Defines a proposition as a statement that is either true or false
  • Classifies propositions into four types: universal affirmative, universal negative, particular affirmative, and particular negative
  • Discusses the concepts of contradiction, contrariety, and subcontrariety among propositions
    • Contradictory propositions cannot both be true or both be false (e.g., "All men are mortal" and "Some men are not mortal")
    • Contrary propositions cannot both be true, but can both be false (e.g., "All men are just" and "No men are just")
    • Subcontrary propositions cannot both be false, but can both be true (e.g., "Some men are just" and "Some men are not just")
  • Introduces the square of opposition, a diagram representing the logical relationships between categorical propositions

Prior Analytics

  • Third book of the Organon, presenting Aristotle's theory of the syllogism
  • Defines a syllogism as a deductive argument consisting of three categorical propositions: a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion
  • Identifies three figures of syllogisms based on the position of the middle term
    • First figure: the middle term is the subject of the major premise and the predicate of the minor premise
    • Second figure: the middle term is the predicate of both premises
    • Third figure: the middle term is the subject of both premises
  • Establishes the rules for valid syllogisms in each figure
  • Discusses methods for reducing syllogisms from one figure to another
  • Lays the foundation for the formal study of deductive reasoning

Posterior Analytics

  • Fourth book of the Organon, dealing with scientific demonstration and knowledge
  • Distinguishes between demonstrative knowledge (episteme) and other forms of knowledge
  • Defines a demonstration as a syllogism that produces scientific knowledge
    • Premises must be true, primary, immediate, better known than, prior to, and explanatory of the conclusion
  • Discusses the role of definitions, essential properties, and causes in scientific explanation
  • Introduces the concept of the "middle term" as the explanatory link between the subject and predicate of a proposition
  • Analyzes the structure of scientific disciplines and the relationships between them
  • Provides a model for the organization and acquisition of scientific knowledge

Topics and Sophistical Refutations

  • The Topics is the fifth book of the Organon, focusing on dialectical reasoning and argumentation
    • Dialectic involves reasoning from generally accepted opinions (endoxa) rather than scientific principles
    • Provides strategies for constructing and refuting arguments in debate
    • Discusses the use of topoi, or "places" from which arguments can be derived
  • Sophistical Refutations is a appendix to the Topics, dealing with fallacies and sophistry
    • Identifies thirteen types of fallacies, including equivocation, amphiboly, and begging the question
    • Provides methods for detecting and countering fallacious arguments
    • Distinguishes between apparent and genuine refutations
  • Together, these works provide a comprehensive treatment of argumentation and debate in both scientific and non-scientific contexts

Impact and Legacy of Aristotle's Logic

  • Established the first formal system of deductive reasoning in Western philosophy
  • Provided a foundation for the development of scientific methodology and the organization of knowledge
  • Influenced the development of medieval scholasticism and the Islamic philosophical tradition
    • Medieval logicians such as Peter Abelard and William of Ockham expanded on Aristotelian logic
    • Islamic philosophers such as Al-Farabi and Avicenna incorporated Aristotelian logic into their works
  • Remained the dominant system of logic until the rise of modern formal logic in the 19th and 20th centuries
    • George Boole and Gottlob Frege developed new systems of logic that built upon and expanded Aristotle's work
  • Continues to be studied and debated by philosophers, logicians, and scholars in various fields
  • Provides a powerful tool for analyzing arguments, constructing proofs, and organizing knowledge


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.