🧠Greek Philosophy Unit 14 – Aristotle's Ethics: Virtue and Happiness
Aristotle's Ethics explores virtue and happiness, focusing on how to live a good life. He argues that cultivating virtues through practice leads to eudaimonia, or flourishing. This approach emphasizes character development and practical wisdom in navigating life's challenges.
Key concepts include the golden mean, which balances extremes, and phronesis, the practical wisdom to discern right action. Aristotle's ideas on virtue, happiness, and ethics continue to influence modern philosophical debates and approaches to well-being.
Virtue (aretê) refers to excellence of character, a disposition to act in accordance with reason and moderation
Eudaimonia is often translated as happiness but more accurately means living well, flourishing, or well-being; it is the highest human good
The golden mean is the desirable middle point between two extremes, one of excess and the other of deficiency (courage is the mean between rashness and cowardice)
Phronesis (practical wisdom) is the intellectual virtue that enables one to discern the right course of action in any given situation
Akrasia (weakness of will) occurs when someone acts against their better judgment due to lack of self-control
Hexis is a stable disposition or character trait that is developed through habituation and practice
Hexeis (plural) are the building blocks of virtue and vice
Telos refers to the end, purpose, or function of a thing; for humans, the telos is eudaimonia
Aristotle's Life and Influences
Aristotle (384-322 BCE) was born in Stagira, a Greek colony on the northern coast of the Aegean Sea
At age 17, he joined Plato's Academy in Athens where he studied for nearly 20 years until Plato's death in 347 BCE
After leaving the Academy, Aristotle traveled widely and educated the young Alexander the Great in Macedonia
In 335 BCE, Aristotle returned to Athens and founded his own school, the Lyceum, where he taught, researched, and wrote extensively
Aristotle's ethical thought was influenced by Plato's theory of Forms but departed from it in significant ways
While Plato held that the Form of the Good was the source of all value, Aristotle grounded his ethics in the telos (purpose) of human life
Aristotle's empirical approach and emphasis on practical reasoning also set him apart from Plato's more abstract and idealistic philosophy
The Nature of Virtue
For Aristotle, virtues are character traits or dispositions (hexeis) that enable us to live well and achieve eudaimonia
Virtues are acquired through practice and habituation; we become virtuous by repeatedly performing virtuous actions
Just as we become skilled musicians by practicing music, we become virtuous by practicing virtue
Aristotle distinguishes between intellectual virtues (such as wisdom and prudence) and moral virtues (such as courage and temperance)
Intellectual virtues are developed through teaching and instruction
Moral virtues are developed through habit and practice
Each moral virtue is a mean between two extremes, one of excess and one of deficiency (the doctrine of the mean)
Virtues are context-dependent; what counts as a virtuous action may vary depending on the situation and the individual involved
True virtue requires practical wisdom (phronesis) to discern the appropriate action in any given circumstance
Happiness (Eudaimonia) Explained
Eudaimonia is the highest human good and the ultimate aim of human life; it is what we all strive for
Often translated as "happiness," eudaimonia is better understood as living well, flourishing, or achieving well-being
Eudaimonia is an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue, not a fleeting emotional state
It requires engaging our rational capacities and living according to reason
Eudaimonia is self-sufficient; it lacks nothing and is desirable for its own sake, not for the sake of something else
To achieve eudaimonia, we must cultivate both intellectual and moral virtues over the course of a complete life
A single virtuous act does not make one eudaimon; it requires a lifetime of virtuous activity
External goods (such as wealth, friends, and political power) are necessary for eudaimonia but not sufficient; virtue is the key ingredient
Contemplation is the highest form of activity and most essential to eudaimonia
The Golden Mean
The doctrine of the mean is central to Aristotle's conception of moral virtue
Each moral virtue is a mean between two extremes, one of excess and one of deficiency
Courage is the mean between the extremes of rashness (excess) and cowardice (deficiency)
Temperance is the mean between self-indulgence (excess) and insensibility (deficiency)
The mean is not a strict mathematical average but a context-dependent middle ground relative to the individual
What is temperate for an Olympic athlete will be different than for an average person
Hitting the mean requires practical wisdom (phronesis) to assess the particulars of each situation
Aiming for the mean is a practical strategy for decision making and action, not an exact formula
Some actions (such as murder and theft) do not admit of a mean; they are always wrong
Practical Wisdom (Phronesis)
Phronesis is the intellectual virtue that enables us to reason well about practical matters and discern the right course of action
It is the ability to deliberate well about what conduces to the good life (eudaimonia) in general
Phronesis is distinct from other intellectual virtues such as episteme (scientific knowledge) and techne (skill)
It is concerned with particulars and context, not universal truths
Practical wisdom is necessary for moral virtue; without it, we cannot hit the mean or act appropriately in each situation
Phronesis is developed through experience, habituation, and learning from role models who exemplify good judgment
It requires understanding, not just cleverness; the phronimos (practically wise person) acts on the basis of a rational principle
Aristotle's Impact on Ethics
Aristotle's ethics have had a profound and enduring influence on Western moral philosophy
His emphasis on virtues, practical wisdom, and the doctrine of the mean have shaped virtue ethics as an alternative to consequentialist and deontological approaches
Aristotle's conception of eudaimonia has informed debates about the nature of well-being and the good life
His distinction between intellectual and moral virtues laid the groundwork for later theories of moral development and education
Aristotle's teleological approach, grounded in the notion of the human telos, has been both influential and controversial
Many contemporary ethicists have drawn on Aristotelian ideas while adapting them to address modern challenges and concerns
Criticisms and Modern Interpretations
Some critics argue that Aristotle's ethics are too focused on the individual and neglect the social and political dimensions of the good life
Feminists have criticized Aristotle's views on women as inherently deficient and irrational, challenging his conceptions of virtue and phronesis
Aristotle's acceptance of slavery and elitist conception of citizenship are deeply problematic from a modern perspective
The doctrine of the mean has been criticized as vague and unhelpful in resolving difficult moral dilemmas
Some argue that Aristotle's ethics are too demanding and fail to accommodate moral luck and the complexities of human psychology
Virtue ethicists have sought to revive Aristotelian themes while addressing these limitations
Alasdair MacIntyre and Rosalind Hursthouse have developed neo-Aristotelian approaches that emphasize practices, traditions, and moral exemplars
Aristotle's eudaimonism has been interpreted in both subjectivist and objectivist ways, sparking debate about the nature of well-being