Cournot and Bertrand models are key frameworks for understanding market competition. Cournot focuses on quantity-based competition, while Bertrand emphasizes price-based rivalry. These models help explain how firms make strategic decisions and reach equilibrium in different market structures.

The outcomes of these models vary significantly. often leads to higher prices and lower quantities than perfect competition. In contrast, with homogeneous products results in prices equal to marginal cost, mirroring perfect competition.

Cournot and Bertrand Competition Models

Cournot vs Bertrand competition

Top images from around the web for Cournot vs Bertrand competition
Top images from around the web for Cournot vs Bertrand competition
  • Cournot model assumes firms compete based on the quantity of output they produce (oil, steel)
    • Firms make simultaneous decisions about their production levels
    • Each firm takes its competitor's output as fixed when deciding its own production quantity
  • Bertrand model assumes firms compete based on the prices they set for their products (retailers, online sellers)
    • Firms make simultaneous decisions about the prices they will charge
    • Each firm takes its competitor's price as fixed when deciding its own price
  • Equilibrium outcomes differ between the two models
    • Cournot competition generally results in higher prices and lower quantities compared to perfect competition (OPEC)
    • Bertrand competition with homogeneous products leads to the same outcome as perfect competition, where price equals marginal cost (generic medications)

Cournot duopoly equilibrium

  • Assumes two firms producing a homogeneous product (Coke and Pepsi)
    • Both firms have the same constant marginal cost of production (cc)
    • The firms face a linear inverse demand function: P=aโˆ’bQP = a - bQ, where Q=q1+q2Q = q_1 + q_2 represents the total market quantity
  • To find Firm 1's profit-maximizing quantity
    • Firm 1 maximizes its profit function: maxโกq1ฯ€1=(aโˆ’b(q1+q2))q1โˆ’cq1\max_{q_1} \pi_1 = (a - b(q_1 + q_2))q_1 - cq_1
    • The first-order condition for is: โˆ‚ฯ€1โˆ‚q1=aโˆ’2bq1โˆ’bq2โˆ’c=0\frac{\partial \pi_1}{\partial q_1} = a - 2bq_1 - bq_2 - c = 0
    • Solving the first-order condition yields Firm 1's function: q1=aโˆ’c2bโˆ’q22q_1 = \frac{a - c}{2b} - \frac{q_2}{2}, which shows how Firm 1's optimal quantity depends on Firm 2's quantity
  • Firm 2's profit maximization problem and best response function are symmetric to Firm 1's
  • To find the quantities
    • Solve the system of best response functions for both firms simultaneously
    • The equilibrium quantities are: q1โˆ—=q2โˆ—=aโˆ’c3bq_1^* = q_2^* = \frac{a - c}{3b}
  • To find the equilibrium price
    • Substitute the equilibrium quantities into the inverse demand function
    • The equilibrium price is: Pโˆ—=aโˆ’b(aโˆ’c3b+aโˆ’c3b)=a+2c3P^* = a - b(\frac{a - c}{3b} + \frac{a - c}{3b}) = \frac{a + 2c}{3}

Nash equilibrium in Bertrand models

  • Assumes two firms producing a homogeneous product (generic drugs)
    • Both firms have the same constant marginal cost of production (cc)
    • Consumers purchase from the firm offering the lowest price
  • In the Nash equilibrium
    • Both firms set their prices equal to marginal cost: p1โˆ—=p2โˆ—=cp_1^* = p_2^* = c
    • If one firm sets a price above marginal cost, its competitor can slightly undercut that price and capture the entire market
    • If a firm sets a price below marginal cost, it will incur losses on each unit sold
  • Equilibrium quantities
    • At the equilibrium price, the firms split the market demand equally
    • Each firm's equilibrium quantity is: q1โˆ—=q2โˆ—=Q(c)2q_1^* = q_2^* = \frac{Q(c)}{2}, where Q(c)Q(c) represents the total market demand at the price equal to marginal cost

Product differentiation in Bertrand competition

  • Product differentiation occurs when firms produce goods that are imperfect substitutes (Coke and Pepsi)
    • Consumers have distinct preferences for the different products
  • With differentiated products, the demand functions for each firm are
    • Firm 1's demand: q1=aโˆ’bp1+dp2q_1 = a - bp_1 + dp_2
    • Firm 2's demand: q2=aโˆ’bp2+dp1q_2 = a - bp_2 + dp_1
    • b>d>0b > d > 0, where bb represents the own-price effect and dd represents the cross-price effect
  • Firm 1's profit maximization problem
    • Firm 1 maximizes its profit function: maxโกp1ฯ€1=(p1โˆ’c)(aโˆ’bp1+dp2)\max_{p_1} \pi_1 = (p_1 - c)(a - bp_1 + dp_2)
    • The first-order condition is: โˆ‚ฯ€1โˆ‚p1=aโˆ’2bp1+dp2+bc=0\frac{\partial \pi_1}{\partial p_1} = a - 2bp_1 + dp_2 + bc = 0
    • Solving the first-order condition yields Firm 1's best response function: p1=a+bc+dp22bp_1 = \frac{a + bc + dp_2}{2b}
  • Firm 2's profit maximization problem and best response function are symmetric to Firm 1's
  • To find the Nash equilibrium prices with differentiated products
    • Solve the system of best response functions for both firms simultaneously
    • The equilibrium prices are: p1โˆ—=p2โˆ—=a+bc2bโˆ’dp_1^* = p_2^* = \frac{a + bc}{2b - d}
  • The equilibrium prices with differentiated products are higher than marginal cost
    • Product differentiation gives firms some market power, allowing them to set prices above marginal cost
    • As products become more differentiated (dd decreases), equilibrium prices increase, reflecting greater market power

Key Terms to Review (13)

Antoine Augustin Cournot: Antoine Augustin Cournot was a French mathematician and economist, best known for his contributions to the field of economic theory, particularly in the analysis of oligopoly and market structures. His work laid the foundation for the Cournot competition model, which describes how firms in a duopoly decide on the quantity of output to produce, leading to market equilibrium under certain assumptions about competition and strategy.
Bertrand Competition: Bertrand competition is a model in which firms compete by setting prices rather than quantities, leading to a market equilibrium where prices tend to equal marginal costs. This concept highlights how price competition can result in lower profits for firms when they offer identical products. It connects to various aspects of economic theory, especially in understanding competitive market dynamics and strategic decision-making in oligopolistic markets.
Bertrand Paradox: The Bertrand Paradox is a concept in economics and game theory that illustrates a situation where two firms competing on price will ultimately lead to prices being driven down to marginal cost, resulting in zero economic profit. This paradox highlights the differences between price competition and quantity competition, particularly in the context of oligopoly markets. It serves as a critical examination of assumptions in competitive behavior and market outcomes.
Best Response: A best response is the strategy that yields the highest payoff for a player, given the strategies chosen by other players in a game. Understanding best responses is crucial because it helps players determine their optimal strategies based on the actions of others, highlighting the interdependence of decisions in strategic interactions.
Cournot Competition: Cournot competition is a model of oligopoly where firms compete on the quantity of output they produce, and each firm's output decision affects the market price. In this setting, firms simultaneously choose quantities to maximize their profits based on their expectations of rival firms' output decisions. This interdependence leads to a Nash Equilibrium, where no firm can increase its profit by unilaterally changing its output level.
Joseph Bertrand: Joseph Bertrand was a French mathematician and economist known for his contributions to game theory, particularly the Bertrand model of competition. This model illustrates how firms compete on price rather than quantity, leading to a unique outcome in oligopolistic markets where prices can drop to marginal cost. Bertrand's work emphasizes the strategic interactions between firms and highlights the importance of price competition in determining market outcomes.
Monopoly: A monopoly is a market structure where a single seller or producer controls the entire supply of a product or service, giving them significant power over pricing and output. In this situation, the monopolist faces no direct competition, which allows them to dictate market conditions, often leading to higher prices and reduced consumer choice.
Nash Equilibrium: Nash Equilibrium is a concept in game theory where players, knowing the strategies of their opponents, choose their optimal strategies resulting in a situation where no player has anything to gain by changing their own strategy unilaterally. This balance occurs when each player's strategy is the best response to the strategies chosen by others, highlighting the interdependence of player decisions and strategic decision-making.
Oligopoly: An oligopoly is a market structure characterized by a small number of firms that dominate the market, where each firm is aware of the actions of the others. This interconnectedness leads to strategic decision-making, as the choices of one firm can significantly impact the others, resulting in various competitive behaviors and outcomes.
Payoff matrix: A payoff matrix is a table that represents the payoffs or outcomes for each player based on their chosen strategies in a game. It helps to visualize the potential results of various combinations of strategies, making it easier to analyze the interactions between players, their strategies, and the associated payoffs.
Price competition: Price competition is a strategy where businesses compete primarily on the basis of price, aiming to attract customers by offering lower prices than their competitors. This approach is common in markets with many suppliers and homogeneous products, where consumers are price-sensitive and will choose the lowest-priced option. Price competition can lead to price wars, affecting profit margins and overall market dynamics.
Profit maximization: Profit maximization is the process of increasing a firm's profits to the highest possible level, achieved by analyzing costs, revenues, and market conditions. This concept is central to understanding how firms operate in competitive markets, where businesses strive to outmaneuver rivals by setting prices and quantities that lead to the greatest possible financial gain.
Reaction Functions: Reaction functions represent the strategies that firms use in response to the actions of their competitors, showing how one firm's output or pricing decisions are influenced by the decisions made by other firms. This concept is crucial in understanding competitive behavior in markets, especially in Cournot and Bertrand competition models, where firms must anticipate their rivals' responses to optimize their own strategies.
ยฉ 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
APยฎ and SATยฎ are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.