🔤Formal Language Theory Unit 2 – Regular Languages & Finite Automata
Regular languages and finite automata form the foundation of formal language theory. They provide a simple yet powerful framework for describing patterns in strings, using concepts like alphabets, strings, and languages.
Deterministic and non-deterministic finite automata are key tools for recognizing regular languages. These abstract machines, along with regular expressions, offer equivalent ways to represent and manipulate regular languages, with applications in various fields of computer science.
Alphabet (Σ) finite, non-empty set of symbols used to form strings and languages
String finite sequence of symbols from an alphabet
Language (L) set of strings over a given alphabet
Can be finite or infinite
Denoted as L⊆Σ∗, where Σ∗ represents the set of all possible strings over the alphabet Σ
Empty string (ϵ) string with no symbols, included in every language
Regular language language that can be described by a regular expression or accepted by a finite automaton
Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA) finite state machine that accepts or rejects strings, transitioning deterministically between states
Non-deterministic Finite Automaton (NFA) finite state machine that can have multiple transitions for the same input, and can transition on ϵ
Regular Languages: Basics and Properties
Regular languages are the simplest class of languages in the Chomsky hierarchy
Can be described using regular expressions or accepted by finite automata (DFAs or NFAs)
Closed under various operations, such as union, intersection, concatenation, and Kleene star
If L1 and L2 are regular languages, then L1∪L2, L1∩L2, L1⋅L2, and L1∗ are also regular languages
Have a finite number of equivalence classes under the Myhill-Nerode relation
Pumpable property if a language is regular, then there exists a constant p (pumping length) such that any string in the language longer than p can be pumped
Not all languages are regular (e.g., {anbn∣n≥0}, the language of balanced parentheses)
Finite Automata: Structure and Types
Finite automata are abstract machines that accept or reject strings
Consist of a finite set of states, a transition function, a start state, and a set of accepting states
Two main types Deterministic Finite Automata (DFAs) and Non-deterministic Finite Automata (NFAs)
DFAs have a unique transition for each input symbol and state
NFAs can have multiple transitions for the same input symbol and state, and can also have ϵ-transitions
Formally, a DFA is a 5-tuple (Q,Σ,δ,q0,F), where
Q is the finite set of states
Σ is the input alphabet
δ is the transition function Q×Σ→Q
q0 is the start state
F⊆Q is the set of accepting states
NFAs have a similar structure but with a transition function δQ×(Σ∪{ϵ})→P(Q), where P(Q) denotes the power set of Q
Every NFA can be converted to an equivalent DFA using the subset construction algorithm
Regular Expressions and Their Equivalence
Regular expressions are a concise way to describe regular languages
Consist of symbols from the alphabet, along with operators union (∣), concatenation (⋅), and Kleene star (∗)
Union L1∣L2 represents the set of strings that are in either L1 or L2
Concatenation L1⋅L2 represents the set of strings obtained by concatenating a string from L1 with a string from L2
Kleene star L∗ represents the set of strings obtained by concatenating zero or more strings from L
Regular expressions can also include parentheses for grouping and the empty string ϵ
Equivalent in power to finite automata (DFAs and NFAs)
For every regular expression, there exists an equivalent NFA
For every NFA, there exists an equivalent regular expression
Can be converted to finite automata using algorithms like Thompson's construction or the state elimination method
Closure Properties of Regular Languages
Regular languages are closed under various operations, meaning that applying these operations to regular languages results in another regular language
Closed under union if L1 and L2 are regular languages, then L1∪L2 is also a regular language
Closed under intersection if L1 and L2 are regular languages, then L1∩L2 is also a regular language
Closed under concatenation if L1 and L2 are regular languages, then L1⋅L2 is also a regular language
Closed under Kleene star if L is a regular language, then L∗ is also a regular language
Closed under complement if L is a regular language, then its complement L is also a regular language
The complement of a language L is the set of all strings over the alphabet that are not in L
These closure properties allow for the construction of new regular languages from existing ones and are useful in proving the regularity of languages
Pumping Lemma and Its Applications
The Pumping Lemma is a powerful tool for proving that certain languages are not regular
States that for every regular language L, there exists a constant p (the pumping length) such that any string s∈L with ∣s∣≥p can be decomposed into three parts s=xyz, satisfying
∣xy∣≤p
∣y∣≥1
xyiz∈L for all i≥0
To use the Pumping Lemma to prove that a language L is not regular
Assume L is regular
Choose a string s∈L with ∣s∣≥p
Decompose s into xyz according to the Pumping Lemma
Show that there exists an i≥0 such that xyiz∈/L, contradicting the Pumping Lemma
Examples of non-regular languages that can be proven using the Pumping Lemma
L={anbn∣n≥0}
L={ww∣w∈{a,b}∗} (the language of palindromes)
The Pumping Lemma is a necessary but not sufficient condition for regularity, meaning that some non-regular languages may satisfy the Pumping Lemma
Limitations of Regular Languages
Regular languages have several limitations in terms of the types of patterns they can describe
Cannot count or match an arbitrary number of occurrences of a symbol
For example, the language {anbn∣n≥0} is not regular because it requires matching the number of a's with the number of b's
Cannot recognize nested or recursive structures
The language of balanced parentheses {(n)n∣n≥0} is not regular because it requires matching opening and closing parentheses
Cannot express languages that require an unbounded amount of memory to recognize
The language of palindromes {wwR∣w∈{a,b}∗} is not regular because recognizing palindromes requires remembering an arbitrary number of symbols
These limitations stem from the finite nature of the automata that recognize regular languages (DFAs and NFAs)
More powerful language classes, such as context-free languages and recursively enumerable languages, can describe patterns that regular languages cannot
Real-World Applications and Examples
Regular languages and finite automata have numerous applications in computer science and beyond
Lexical analysis in compilers regular expressions are used to specify the valid tokens of a programming language, and finite automata (usually DFAs) are used to recognize these tokens
Pattern matching in text editors regular expressions are used to search for and manipulate specific patterns in text files
Network protocol validation finite automata can model the valid sequences of messages in network protocols (e.g., TCP handshake)
Hardware design finite state machines, which are essentially finite automata, are used to design digital circuits and control systems
Natural language processing regular expressions are used for tasks like tokenization, sentence segmentation, and named entity recognition
Bioinformatics regular expressions are used to search for patterns in DNA and protein sequences