9.3 Substantive testing procedures
8 min read•august 21, 2024
is a crucial part of financial statement audits, designed to detect material misstatements. Auditors use these procedures to gather evidence supporting the accuracy of financial assertions, examining account balances, transactions, and disclosures to verify their validity.
The process involves , tests of details, and . Risk assessment guides the approach, with higher risks requiring more persuasive evidence. Auditors must balance efficiency with the need for sufficient appropriate evidence, using and leveraging technology to enhance their work.
Nature of substantive testing
- Substantive testing forms a critical component of financial statement audits aimed at detecting material misstatements
- Auditors employ substantive procedures to gather evidence supporting the accuracy and of financial statement assertions
- These tests directly examine account balances, transactions, and disclosures to verify their validity and proper reporting
Definition and purpose
Top images from around the web for Definition and purpose
Infographic: 2018/19 National Departmental audit outcomes | PMG View original
Is this image relevant?
Basic Accounting Procedures | OpenStax Intro to Business View original
Is this image relevant?
Finance Policies And Procedures Manual View original
Is this image relevant?
Infographic: 2018/19 National Departmental audit outcomes | PMG View original
Is this image relevant?
Basic Accounting Procedures | OpenStax Intro to Business View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Definition and purpose
Infographic: 2018/19 National Departmental audit outcomes | PMG View original
Is this image relevant?
Basic Accounting Procedures | OpenStax Intro to Business View original
Is this image relevant?
Finance Policies And Procedures Manual View original
Is this image relevant?
Infographic: 2018/19 National Departmental audit outcomes | PMG View original
Is this image relevant?
Basic Accounting Procedures | OpenStax Intro to Business View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Audit procedures designed to detect material misstatements at the assertion level
- Aim to obtain direct evidence about the validity of transactions, account balances, and disclosures
- Complement risk assessment procedures and tests of controls in the audit process
- Help auditors form an opinion on the fairness of financial statements
Types of substantive procedures
- Analytical procedures evaluate plausible relationships among financial and non-financial data
- Tests of details examine specific transactions, account balances, or other financial statement elements
- simultaneously test controls and gather substantive evidence
- External confirmations obtain direct written responses from third parties
Risk assessment considerations
- 's understanding of the entity and its environment influences substantive testing approach
- Assessment of inherent and control risks guides the nature, timing, and extent of substantive procedures
- Higher assessed risks typically require more persuasive
- Risk of material at the assertion level determines specific substantive procedures
Substantive analytical procedures
- Analytical procedures involve comparing recorded amounts to expected values based on relevant information
- These techniques help identify unusual fluctuations or relationships that may indicate material misstatements
- Auditors use analytical procedures throughout the audit process, including planning, fieldwork, and conclusion phases
Trend analysis techniques
- Examine changes in account balances or ratios over time to identify unexpected variations
- Compare current period data to historical results and industry benchmarks
- Utilize graphical representations to visualize trends and spot anomalies
- Consider factors such as seasonality, economic conditions, and changes in business operations
Ratio analysis methods
- Calculate financial ratios to assess relationships between different accounts or financial statement elements
- Compare computed ratios to industry standards, prior periods, and 's expectations
- Analyze profitability ratios (gross margin, return on assets) to evaluate financial performance
- Examine liquidity ratios (, quick ratio) to assess short-term solvency
Predictive analysis approaches
- Develop expectations for account balances or financial statement relationships using statistical models
- Utilize regression analysis to forecast values based on historical data and relevant variables
- Compare actual results to predicted values and investigate significant discrepancies
- Consider non-financial data (production volumes, employee headcount) in developing predictions
Tests of details
- Tests of details involve examining specific transactions, account balances, or disclosures
- These procedures provide direct evidence about the , accuracy, and completeness of financial statement elements
- Auditors select items for testing based on risk assessment and professional judgment
Vouching vs tracing
- involves examining supporting documentation for recorded transactions or balances
- Trace recorded amounts back to source documents to verify accuracy and completeness
- Vouch from source documents to accounting records to test for unrecorded transactions
- Select samples based on materiality, risk assessment, and population characteristics
Confirmation procedures
- Obtain direct written responses from third parties to verify account balances or transactions
- Commonly used for accounts receivable, bank balances, and investments
- Design confirmation requests to address specific audit assertions (existence, rights and obligations)
- Evaluate reliability of confirmations based on respondent's knowledge, objectivity, and independence
Physical observation techniques
- Directly observe tangible assets to verify their existence and condition
- Conduct inventory counts to test the accuracy of reported quantities
- Inspect fixed assets to confirm their physical presence and operational status
- Document observations through photographs, videos, or detailed notes
Recalculation methods
- Independently recalculate amounts to verify mathematical accuracy of reported figures
- Recompute depreciation expense to test fixed asset valuations
- Recalculate interest expense on loans to verify accuracy of reported amounts
- Use for large-scale recalculations
Sampling in substantive testing
- Sampling enables auditors to draw conclusions about entire populations by examining a subset of items
- Proper sampling techniques help balance audit efficiency with the need for sufficient appropriate evidence
- Auditors must carefully design and evaluate samples to support their audit opinions
Statistical vs non-statistical sampling
- uses probability theory to quantify sampling risk and precision
- relies on auditor judgment to determine sample size and evaluate results
- Statistical methods include attribute sampling (for tests of controls) and variables sampling (for substantive tests)
- Non-statistical approaches often involve judgmental or haphazard selection of sample items
Sample size determination
- Consider factors such as population size, expected error rate, and desired level of assurance
- Use statistical formulas or tables to calculate sample sizes for statistical sampling
- Apply professional judgment to determine appropriate sample sizes for non-statistical sampling
- Adjust sample sizes based on risk assessment and the nature of the population being tested
Evaluation of sampling results
- Project sample results to the entire population to estimate potential misstatements
- Consider both quantitative and qualitative factors when evaluating sampling results
- Investigate and understand the nature of identified errors or deviations
- Assess whether sampling results provide sufficient appropriate evidence to support audit conclusions
Audit evidence
- Audit evidence forms the foundation for the auditor's opinion on financial statements
- Auditors must obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to support their conclusions
- The nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures determine the quality and quantity of evidence gathered
Sources of audit evidence
- Internal sources include accounting records, management representations, and entity-generated reports
- External sources encompass third-party confirmations, industry data, and public records
- Physical evidence obtained through observation and inspection procedures
- Analytical procedures generate evidence through the analysis of financial and non-financial data
Reliability of audit evidence
- Consider the source and nature of evidence when assessing its reliability
- Evidence obtained from independent external sources generally more reliable than internally generated information
- Original documents typically more reliable than photocopies or facsimiles
- Direct evidence obtained by the auditor (observation, ) generally more reliable than indirect evidence
Sufficiency and appropriateness
- refers to the quantity of audit evidence obtained
- relates to the quality, relevance, and reliability of evidence
- Auditors must exercise professional judgment to determine when sufficient appropriate evidence has been gathered
- Consider the risk of material misstatement and the persuasiveness of evidence when evaluating sufficiency and appropriateness
Substantive testing by account
- Auditors tailor substantive procedures to address specific risks and assertions for each significant account or class of transactions
- The nature, timing, and extent of testing vary based on the assessed risks and characteristics of each account
Revenue and receivables
- Perform to ensure proper revenue recognition in the correct period
- Confirm accounts receivable balances with customers to verify existence and accuracy
- Analyze sales returns and allowances to assess the reasonableness of reported net revenue
- Test cash receipts subsequent to year-end to evaluate the collectibility of receivables
Inventory and cost of goods sold
- Observe physical inventory counts to verify existence and condition of inventory
- Test inventory pricing by examining purchase invoices and recalculating unit costs
- Perform analytical procedures to assess the reasonableness of inventory turnover and gross margins
- Evaluate inventory obsolescence by examining slow-moving items and market conditions
Fixed assets and depreciation
- Inspect significant fixed asset additions to verify existence and proper capitalization
- Recalculate depreciation expense to test the accuracy of reported amounts
- Review repair and maintenance accounts for potential capital expenditures
- Assess the reasonableness of useful lives and residual values used in depreciation calculations
Liabilities and expenses
- Confirm loan balances and terms with lenders to verify completeness and accuracy
- Perform search for unrecorded liabilities by examining subsequent cash disbursements
- Analyze accrued expenses for completeness and proper cutoff
- Test payroll expenses by recalculating wages and examining supporting documentation
Timing of substantive procedures
- The timing of substantive procedures impacts the relevance and reliability of audit evidence obtained
- Auditors must balance the need for timely evidence with the desire to minimize disruption to the client's operations
Interim vs year-end testing
- Interim testing performed before the balance sheet date to spread audit work and identify issues early
- Year-end testing focuses on updating interim work and addressing high-risk areas
- Consider the effectiveness of internal controls when determining the extent of interim testing
- Perform roll-forward procedures to cover the period between interim testing and year-end
Subsequent events procedures
- Review transactions and events occurring after the balance sheet date but before the audit report date
- Inquire of management about any significant subsequent events or transactions
- Examine board minutes, financial reports, and legal documents for evidence of subsequent events
- Assess the impact of identified subsequent events on financial statement disclosures and audit opinion
Documentation requirements
- Audit documentation provides evidence of the auditor's work and supports the conclusions reached
- Proper documentation enables experienced auditors to understand the nature, timing, and extent of procedures performed
Working papers for substantive tests
- Document the objectives, procedures performed, and results of substantive tests
- Include copies of relevant source documents, schedules, and analyses
- Clearly identify the preparer, reviewer, and dates of preparation and review
- Cross-reference working papers to facilitate navigation and demonstrate completeness
Evidence of procedures performed
- Maintain detailed records of samples selected and items examined
- Document the basis for analytical expectations and conclusions drawn
- Include evidence of management's responses to inquiries and follow-up procedures performed
- Retain copies of external confirmations and other third-party evidence obtained
Technology in substantive testing
- Advancements in technology have transformed the way auditors perform substantive testing
- Auditors leverage various tools and techniques to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of audit procedures
Data analytics tools
- Utilize data visualization software to identify trends, patterns, and anomalies in large datasets
- Apply machine learning algorithms to detect unusual transactions or relationships
- Perform continuous auditing by analyzing entire populations rather than samples
- Use predictive analytics to develop more precise expectations for analytical procedures
Computer-assisted audit techniques
- Employ audit software to extract and analyze data from client systems
- Automate routine audit tasks such as recalculations and comparisons
- Use scripting languages to develop custom audit routines for complex testing scenarios
- Leverage robotic process automation to perform repetitive audit procedures
Limitations of substantive testing
- While substantive testing provides valuable evidence, auditors must recognize its inherent limitations
- Understanding these limitations helps auditors design appropriate procedures and interpret results
Inherent limitations
- Sampling risk exists when conclusions based on samples may differ from those based on entire populations
- Fraud involving collusion or management override may be difficult to detect through substantive procedures alone
- Timing differences between the occurrence of transactions and the performance of audit procedures
- Limitations in the availability and reliability of audit evidence for certain assertions or accounts
Professional skepticism considerations
- Maintain an attitude of professional skepticism throughout the audit process
- Critically evaluate audit evidence obtained through substantive procedures
- Remain alert to contradictory evidence or circumstances that may indicate potential misstatements
- Consider the possibility of management bias in accounting estimates and judgments
Key Terms to Review (32)
Analytical procedures: Analytical procedures are techniques used by auditors to evaluate financial information by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. These procedures are essential for identifying unusual transactions or trends that may indicate risks of material misstatement in financial statements. By comparing current data with prior periods, budgets, or industry norms, auditors can gain insights into the overall financial health and operational effectiveness of an entity.
Appropriateness: Appropriateness refers to the relevance and suitability of the evidence gathered during substantive testing procedures in relation to the specific financial assertions being evaluated. It is crucial because it ensures that the information obtained supports the conclusions drawn about the accuracy and reliability of financial statements. By assessing the appropriateness of evidence, auditors can effectively determine whether they have enough reliable data to make informed judgments.
Audit evidence: Audit evidence refers to the information collected by auditors to support their opinion on the financial statements of an entity. This evidence can come from various sources and helps ensure that the financial statements are free from material misstatement. It plays a crucial role in substantive testing procedures, where auditors evaluate the accuracy and completeness of financial information by obtaining reliable data.
Auditor: An auditor is a professional who examines and verifies a company's financial statements and accounting practices to ensure accuracy and compliance with accounting standards. They play a critical role in the financial reporting process by providing an independent assessment of financial information, which builds trust among investors, regulators, and the public.
Completeness: Completeness refers to the accounting principle that ensures all financial transactions and events are fully recorded and reflected in financial statements. This principle is crucial for providing a true and fair view of an entity's financial position, as it helps ensure that all relevant information is included and nothing significant is omitted, thus enhancing the reliability of financial reporting.
Computer-assisted audit techniques: Computer-assisted audit techniques (CAATs) refer to the use of computer software and tools to perform audit procedures and analyze data more efficiently and effectively. CAATs enhance the auditor's ability to examine large volumes of data, identify anomalies, and conduct detailed testing of transactions, making them essential in both forensic investigations and substantive testing procedures.
Control Risk: Control risk is the likelihood that a company's internal controls will fail to prevent or detect material misstatements in financial statements. It reflects the effectiveness of the control environment and is a crucial consideration during audits, as it helps auditors assess the level of substantive testing needed. A higher control risk means more extensive testing is often necessary to ensure accurate financial reporting.
Current Ratio: The current ratio is a financial metric that measures a company's ability to pay its short-term liabilities with its short-term assets. It is calculated by dividing current assets by current liabilities, providing insight into the liquidity and financial health of a business.
Cutoff tests: Cutoff tests are procedures used in auditing to determine whether transactions are recorded in the correct accounting period. They help ensure that financial statements reflect accurate income and expenses by examining transactions that occur around the end of a reporting period. These tests are crucial for maintaining the integrity of financial reporting and preventing misstatements due to timing errors.
Data analytics: Data analytics refers to the systematic computational analysis of data to uncover patterns, correlations, and insights that can inform decision-making. It plays a crucial role in evaluating financial statements by helping identify trends and anomalies, which can then guide substantive testing procedures to ensure accuracy and compliance.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio: The debt-to-equity ratio is a financial metric that compares a company's total liabilities to its shareholders' equity, highlighting the relative proportion of debt and equity used to finance a company's assets. This ratio provides insight into a firm's financial leverage and is crucial in assessing its capital structure, risk level, and overall financial health, especially when evaluating solvency, compliance with GAAP, and performance across various industries.
Dual-purpose tests: Dual-purpose tests are audit procedures designed to obtain evidence for both substantive testing and tests of controls simultaneously. These tests aim to increase efficiency in the audit process by allowing auditors to gather sufficient evidence regarding the effectiveness of internal controls while also assessing the accuracy of financial statement balances.
Existence: In the context of financial statement auditing, existence refers to the assertion that assets, liabilities, and equity balances presented in the financial statements actually exist at a given date. This concept is crucial in ensuring that reported amounts are not overstated or fabricated, thereby providing a true representation of a company's financial position.
External confirmations: External confirmations are inquiries made by auditors to independent third parties to obtain evidence regarding specific financial statement assertions. These confirmations serve as a key substantive testing procedure, enabling auditors to validate account balances, transactions, or conditions reported by the company being audited.
Fraud Risk: Fraud risk refers to the possibility that an organization may suffer from fraudulent activities that can result in financial loss or damage to its reputation. This risk often emerges from weaknesses in internal controls, inadequate oversight, or intentional misrepresentation of financial information. Understanding and assessing fraud risk is crucial for effective substantive testing procedures to detect and prevent financial statement misstatements.
Inherent risk: Inherent risk refers to the possibility of material misstatements in financial statements due to factors other than the internal controls put in place by an organization. This type of risk is tied to the nature of the business, the complexity of transactions, and external factors that can influence financial reporting. Understanding inherent risk helps auditors determine where to focus their attention, evaluate potential issues, and design effective audit procedures.
Management: Management refers to the process of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling an organization's resources to achieve specific goals efficiently and effectively. It plays a crucial role in guiding teams and allocating resources to ensure that operational objectives are met while also adapting to changes in the environment.
Misstatement: A misstatement is an error or inaccuracy in financial statements that can arise from mistakes in data entry, incorrect application of accounting principles, or deliberate manipulation. Misstatements can be either material or immaterial, and they can significantly affect the reliability and integrity of financial reporting, which is essential for stakeholders making informed decisions.
Non-statistical sampling: Non-statistical sampling is a method of selecting samples based on non-random criteria rather than random selection. This approach is often used when auditors and analysts need to gather evidence that is not statistically valid but is still relevant and practical for the assessment of financial statements.
Physical Observation: Physical observation refers to the process of directly examining and verifying the existence and condition of assets or inventory by an auditor. This technique is crucial for obtaining reliable evidence regarding the accuracy and completeness of financial records, as it involves firsthand examination rather than relying solely on documentation or reports. By using physical observation, auditors can assess both the quality and quantity of tangible assets, ensuring that what is reported in the financial statements aligns with what actually exists.
Predictive analysis: Predictive analysis refers to the process of using statistical algorithms and machine learning techniques to identify the likelihood of future outcomes based on historical data. This approach helps organizations make informed decisions by providing insights into trends and patterns, allowing them to proactively address potential issues or seize opportunities.
Ratio Analysis: Ratio analysis is a quantitative method used to evaluate the financial performance and position of a company by comparing various financial metrics. This technique allows stakeholders to understand the company's ability to meet its obligations, profitability, efficiency, and overall financial health. By applying ratio analysis, one can assess specific areas such as liquidity, solvency, and profitability, helping in decision-making and performance evaluation.
Recalculation: Recalculation is the process of verifying the mathematical accuracy of amounts in financial statements by performing independent calculations. This technique is crucial during substantive testing procedures, as it helps auditors confirm that recorded figures are correct, ensuring the reliability of financial information.
Sampling techniques: Sampling techniques are methods used to select a subset of individuals or items from a larger population for the purpose of statistical analysis. These techniques are crucial in substantive testing procedures, as they help auditors and analysts draw conclusions about the overall population based on a smaller, manageable sample size.
Statistical sampling: Statistical sampling is a method used to select a representative subset of individuals or items from a larger population to make inferences about the entire group. This technique is crucial in various analytical processes, allowing auditors and analysts to gather insights without needing to assess every single item, making it efficient and cost-effective.
Subsequent events procedures: Subsequent events procedures are actions taken by auditors to identify and evaluate events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the issuance of financial statements. These procedures help ensure that any significant events affecting the financial position of a company are appropriately disclosed in the financial statements, thereby enhancing the accuracy and reliability of the reported information.
Substantive Testing: Substantive testing refers to the procedures auditors use to verify the accuracy and completeness of financial statement information. This process is essential for assessing whether the financial statements present a true and fair view of the company’s financial position and performance. The procedures can include various techniques such as analytical reviews, direct confirmations, and detailed testing of transactions and account balances.
Sufficiency: Sufficiency refers to the measure of the quantity and quality of audit evidence needed to support the conclusions drawn during the auditing process. It plays a critical role in determining whether an auditor has gathered enough reliable evidence to form an opinion on the financial statements, ensuring that the findings are both accurate and credible.
Test of details: A test of details is an auditing procedure that involves examining specific transactions, account balances, and other relevant information to verify their accuracy and completeness. This method is crucial for obtaining evidence about the assertions made by management in the financial statements. It allows auditors to evaluate whether the financial statements are free from material misstatements by scrutinizing individual entries rather than relying solely on analytical procedures.
Tracing: Tracing refers to the process of following the flow of transactions through financial records to verify their accuracy and validity. This method is crucial in substantive testing procedures, as it helps auditors confirm that amounts reported in the financial statements are based on actual transactions and provide assurance about the integrity of the financial information.
Trend Analysis: Trend analysis is a method used to evaluate financial data over a specific period to identify patterns, shifts, or trends that can inform decision-making. This technique helps in understanding how various metrics change over time, which can highlight growth opportunities or potential issues within a business.
Vouching: Vouching is an audit technique that involves verifying the authenticity of transactions by tracing them back to their original source documents. This process helps ensure that recorded financial transactions are legitimate and accurately reflected in the financial statements. By examining supporting documents like invoices, receipts, or contracts, auditors can confirm that the entries in the accounting records are valid and comply with relevant accounting standards.