🥸Ethics Unit 5 – Moral Relativism and Absolutism

Key Concepts

• Moral relativism holds that moral judgments are relative to individual or cultural beliefs and values
• Moral absolutism asserts that there are universal, objective moral truths that apply to all people regardless of their beliefs or cultural context
• Descriptive moral relativism observes that different cultures have different moral beliefs and practices without making judgments about their validity
• Normative moral relativism goes further, arguing that the moral beliefs of each culture are valid for that culture and cannot be judged by outside standards
• Cultural relativism is a form of moral relativism that holds that moral beliefs and practices are relative to specific cultures
• Moral universalism, a key aspect of moral absolutism, holds that there are moral principles that apply to all people in all times and places
• Moral objectivism, another aspect of moral absolutism, asserts that moral truths exist independently of what any individual or culture believes
• Moral realism is the view that moral facts and properties exist objectively, while moral anti-realism denies this

Historical Context

• The debate between moral relativism and absolutism has roots in ancient Greek philosophy, with the Sophists arguing for relativism and Plato and Aristotle defending forms of absolutism
• In the modern era, anthropologists like Franz Boas and Ruth Benedict argued for cultural relativism based on their studies of diverse cultures
• Moral philosophers like J.L. Mackie and Gilbert Harman have defended forms of moral relativism in the 20th century
• Absolutist views have been defended by philosophers like Immanuel Kant, who argued for the existence of universal moral duties based on reason
• Religious traditions like Christianity and Islam have historically been associated with moral absolutism, holding that moral truths are revealed by God
• The horrors of World War II and the Holocaust led to a renewed interest in moral absolutism as a bulwark against genocide and other atrocities
• The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations in 1948, reflects a commitment to universal moral principles
• Debates about moral relativism and absolutism continue to be relevant to contemporary issues like human rights, cultural diversity, and globalization

Arguments for Moral Relativism

• Different cultures have radically different moral beliefs and practices, suggesting that morality is relative rather than universal
  • For example, some cultures practice polygamy while others strictly prohibit it
  • Attitudes toward practices like human sacrifice, cannibalism, and honor killing also vary widely across cultures
• There is no clear way to adjudicate between conflicting moral beliefs held by different cultures or individuals
• Moral beliefs and practices seem to be heavily influenced by cultural upbringing and social conditioning rather than objective moral facts
• The existence of moral disagreement, even among thoughtful and well-informed people, suggests that there may not be objective moral truths
• Moral relativism encourages tolerance and respect for cultural diversity by avoiding the imposition of one culture's moral beliefs on others
• Moral absolutism can lead to intolerance, dogmatism, and even violence when one group seeks to impose its moral beliefs on others
• Moral relativism is more compatible with a scientific worldview that emphasizes empirical observation and cultural variation

Arguments for Moral Absolutism

• Without universal moral principles, we have no basis for condemning atrocities like genocide, torture, and slavery
  • The claim that these practices are only wrong relative to a particular culture seems deeply counterintuitive
• Moral relativism can lead to a kind of moral nihilism or skepticism, where anything goes and nothing is truly right or wrong
• There are some moral beliefs, like the wrongness of torturing babies for fun, that seem to be universal across cultures
• We can reason about morality and discover objective moral truths through philosophical argumentation and reflection
  • For example, Kant's Categorical Imperative provides a rational basis for universal moral duties
• The existence of moral progress over time, such as the abolition of slavery and the expansion of human rights, suggests that we are discovering objective moral truths
• Moral absolutism provides a more secure foundation for human rights and social justice movements
• Without moral absolutism, it would be impossible to morally criticize the practices of other cultures, no matter how abhorrent they may seem

Real-World Applications

• The debate between moral relativism and absolutism is relevant to issues of cultural diversity and international relations
  • Moral relativism suggests that we should be tolerant of the practices of other cultures, even if we disagree with them
  • Moral absolutism holds that some practices, like human rights abuses, are wrong regardless of cultural context
• Moral relativism and absolutism have implications for the universality of human rights
  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights reflects a commitment to moral absolutism and the existence of universal moral principles
  • Some critics argue that human rights are a Western construct that should not be imposed on non-Western cultures
• Debates about the morality of practices like female genital mutilation, child marriage, and honor killings often involve tensions between relativist and absolutist views
• Moral relativism and absolutism are relevant to debates about ethical issues like abortion, euthanasia, and animal rights
  • Moral absolutists may hold that these practices are always wrong, while relativists may see them as morally permissible in some cultural contexts
• In the business world, multinational corporations must navigate cultural differences and decide whether to adopt universal ethical standards or adapt to local norms
• Moral relativism and absolutism have implications for the practice of international law and the prosecution of war crimes and human rights abuses

Critiques and Counterarguments

• Critics argue that moral relativism is self-refuting, because the claim that all morality is relative is itself a universal moral claim
• Moral relativism can lead to a kind of moral paralysis or indifference, where we are unable to make moral judgments or take moral action
• Some argue that moral relativism is based on a flawed understanding of cultural diversity, and that there are in fact many moral universals across cultures
• Moral absolutism can be criticized for being overly rigid and failing to account for the complexity and context-dependence of moral decision-making
• Some argue that moral absolutism is based on unwarranted assumptions about the existence of objective moral facts or divine commands
• Moral absolutism can lead to moral imperialism, where one culture seeks to impose its moral beliefs on others through force or coercion
• Critics argue that both moral relativism and absolutism oversimplify the nature of morality, which may involve a complex interplay of universal principles and cultural context

Philosophical Implications

• The debate between moral relativism and absolutism has implications for the nature of morality itself, and whether moral facts and properties exist objectively
• Moral relativism is often associated with moral anti-realism, the view that there are no objective moral facts or properties
  • J.L. Mackie's "argument from queerness" suggests that objective moral facts would be metaphysically strange and epistemologically inaccessible
• Moral absolutism is often associated with moral realism, the view that moral facts and properties exist objectively and independently of what anyone believes
  • Moral naturalism holds that moral facts are reducible to or identical with natural facts, while moral non-naturalism holds that they are sui generis
• The debate has implications for the possibility of moral knowledge and moral justification
  • Moral relativism may imply a kind of moral skepticism, where moral knowledge is impossible or unjustified
  • Moral absolutism suggests that moral knowledge is possible through reason, intuition, or divine revelation
• The relationship between morality and religion is also at stake in the debate
  • Some argue that morality depends on God's commands or nature, while others hold that morality is independent of religion
• The debate has implications for the role of reason and emotion in moral decision-making
  • Moral absolutism may emphasize the role of reason in discovering universal moral principles
  • Moral relativism may give greater weight to emotion and sentiment in shaping moral beliefs and practices

Ethical Decision-Making

• The debate between moral relativism and absolutism has practical implications for how individuals and societies approach ethical decision-making
• Moral absolutism suggests that ethical decision-making should be guided by universal moral principles or rules
  • Deontological theories like Kant's emphasize absolute moral duties and the importance of acting from the right motives
  • Divine command theory holds that the right thing to do is whatever God commands
• Moral relativism suggests that ethical decision-making should be context-dependent and sensitive to cultural differences
  • Consequentialist theories like utilitarianism focus on producing the best overall consequences, which may vary depending on the situation
  • Virtue ethics emphasizes the cultivation of moral character traits rather than adherence to universal rules
• In practice, many people may adopt a kind of ethical pluralism that recognizes both universal moral principles and the importance of cultural context
• Ethical decision-making often involves weighing competing moral considerations and making difficult trade-offs
  • For example, the principle of respect for autonomy may conflict with the principle of beneficence in cases involving end-of-life care
• Moral relativism and absolutism can also influence how we approach applied ethical issues like bioethics, environmental ethics, and business ethics
  • Moral absolutism may provide clearer guidance in some cases, while moral relativism may allow for greater flexibility and sensitivity to context
• Ultimately, the debate between moral relativism and absolutism highlights the complexity of ethical decision-making and the need for ongoing reflection and dialogue about moral issues.