9.3 Performance-based assessment
8 min read•august 21, 2024
evaluates students' ability to apply knowledge in real-world contexts. It focuses on demonstrating mastery through complex tasks, aligning closely with English and Language Arts Education by assessing communication and skills.
This approach moves beyond traditional testing methods, providing a comprehensive view of student abilities. It encourages deeper learning and engagement, challenging students to showcase practical language use in authentic situations that reflect real-world applications of their skills.
Definition of performance-based assessment
- Evaluates students' abilities to apply knowledge and skills in authentic, real-world contexts
- Focuses on demonstrating mastery through complex tasks rather than isolated facts
- Aligns closely with English and Language Arts Education by assessing communication and critical thinking skills
Key characteristics
Top images from around the web for Key characteristics
.jpg&w=640&q=75)
Course: Unit 37: Testing Higher Orders of Thinking View original
Is this image relevant?
Use Effective Questioning Strategies – NSCC College Guide 101 View original
Is this image relevant?
Fast Track English: M-learning. Can Mobagogy promote Higher Order Thinking Skills View original
Is this image relevant?
Course: Unit 37: Testing Higher Orders of Thinking View original
Is this image relevant?
Use Effective Questioning Strategies – NSCC College Guide 101 View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Key characteristics
Course: Unit 37: Testing Higher Orders of Thinking View original
Is this image relevant?
Use Effective Questioning Strategies – NSCC College Guide 101 View original
Is this image relevant?
Fast Track English: M-learning. Can Mobagogy promote Higher Order Thinking Skills View original
Is this image relevant?
Course: Unit 37: Testing Higher Orders of Thinking View original
Is this image relevant?
Use Effective Questioning Strategies – NSCC College Guide 101 View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Requires students to create a product, perform an action, or solve a problem
- Emphasizes higher-order thinking skills (analysis, synthesis, evaluation)
- Assesses process and product, not just final outcomes
- Integrates multiple skills and knowledge areas
- Allows for varied approaches and solutions
Comparison to traditional assessment
- Moves beyond multiple-choice or short-answer questions
- Provides more comprehensive view of student abilities and understanding
- Reflects real-world applications of knowledge and skills
- Encourages deeper learning and engagement
- Challenges students to demonstrate practical language use in context
Types of performance tasks
- Encompass a wide range of activities that showcase student learning
- Allow for and individual expression in English and Language Arts
- Provide opportunities for authentic language production and comprehension
Projects and portfolios
- Long-term assignments that demonstrate growth over time
- May include research papers, creative writing collections, or multimedia presentations
- Showcase student work samples and reflections on learning process
- Allow for revision and improvement based on feedback
- Demonstrate mastery of multiple language skills (reading, writing, research)
Presentations and demonstrations
- Oral presentations on literary analysis or research findings
- Dramatic performances of scenes from plays or original works
- Debates on current issues or literary themes
- Teaching a concept to peers (student-led lessons)
- Demonstrating language proficiency through interviews or storytelling
Simulations and role-plays
- Mock trials based on literary works or historical events
- News broadcasts reporting on current events or book plots
- Job interviews practicing professional communication skills
- Cultural simulations to practice language in authentic contexts
- Literary character interactions to demonstrate comprehension and analysis
Design principles
- Guide the creation of effective performance-based assessments
- Ensure alignment with English and Language Arts curriculum goals
- Promote fair and meaningful evaluation of student abilities
Authentic contexts
- Mirror real-world situations and challenges
- Use tasks relevant to students' lives and future careers
- Incorporate current events and contemporary issues
- Simulate authentic audiences for student work (publishing for peers)
- Connect assessment to real-world language use scenarios
Clear criteria and rubrics
- Develop specific, measurable criteria for success
- Create detailed rubrics that outline performance expectations
- Share rubrics with students before the assessment begins
- Include both content and language-specific criteria
- Align rubrics with course objectives and standards
Multiple assessment opportunities
- Provide various chances to demonstrate skills throughout a unit or course
- Allow for different types of tasks to accommodate diverse learning styles
- Incorporate both formative and summative assessments
- Enable students to show growth and improvement over time
- Assess language skills in various contexts and formats
Implementation strategies
- Ensure successful execution of performance-based assessments
- Integrate seamlessly into English and Language Arts curriculum
- Maximize learning opportunities through thoughtful implementation
Planning and preparation
- Align tasks with specific learning objectives and standards
- Develop clear instructions and expectations for students
- Create supporting materials (rubrics, checklists, exemplars)
- Plan for necessary resources and technology
- Consider potential challenges and prepare accommodations
Task administration
- Introduce the task and clarify expectations
- Provide sufficient time for task completion
- Offer guidance and support during the process
- Monitor progress and provide interim feedback
- Ensure equitable access to resources and support
Feedback and reflection
- Provide timely and specific feedback on student performance
- Encourage student self-reflection on their work and process
- Facilitate peer feedback and collaborative evaluation
- Use feedback to inform future instruction and
- Promote metacognitive skills through guided reflection activities
Benefits for language learning
- Enhance overall language proficiency through authentic application
- Support English and Language Arts Education goals for communication skills
- Foster deeper engagement with language and literature
Real-world application
- Prepares students for language use in practical situations
- Develops transferable skills for academic and professional contexts
- Encourages critical thinking and problem-solving in language tasks
- Promotes cultural competence and global awareness
- Bridges the gap between classroom learning and real-life language use
Holistic skill development
- Integrates multiple language skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening)
- Fosters connections between different areas of language learning
- Develops metacognitive strategies for language acquisition
- Encourages creativity and personal expression through language
- Promotes critical analysis of texts and language use
Motivation and engagement
- Increases student investment in learning outcomes
- Provides meaningful contexts for language practice
- Allows for personalization and choice in task completion
- Fosters a sense of accomplishment through tangible products
- Encourages collaborative learning and peer interaction
Challenges and limitations
- Present potential obstacles in implementing performance-based assessments
- Require careful consideration in English and Language Arts Education
- Necessitate strategies to mitigate drawbacks and ensure fairness
Time and resource constraints
- Require significant planning and preparation time for teachers
- May take longer to administer than traditional assessments
- Demand more resources (materials, technology, space)
- Challenge time management skills for both teachers and students
- Potentially limit the breadth of content covered due to depth of tasks
Subjectivity in scoring
- Introduces potential for bias in evaluation
- Requires clear rubrics and criteria to ensure fairness
- May lead to inconsistencies between different evaluators
- Challenges standardization across classrooms or schools
- Necessitates training for teachers in objective scoring techniques
Alignment with standards
- May not directly address all required standards or benchmarks
- Requires careful mapping of tasks to curriculum objectives
- Challenges traditional standardized testing preparation
- Potentially conflicts with district or state assessment requirements
- Necessitates balance between depth and breadth of content coverage
Assessment of language skills
- Focuses on evaluating specific aspects of language proficiency
- Aligns with core competencies in English and Language Arts Education
- Provides targeted feedback on individual language skill development
Speaking and listening tasks
- Oral presentations on literary analysis or research findings
- Debates on current issues or themes from literature
- Podcast creation discussing books or language topics
- Interviews with peers or community members
- Group discussions and Socratic seminars on texts
Reading comprehension activities
- Creating visual representations of text (mind maps, infographics)
- Writing alternative endings or sequels to stories
- Developing character profiles based on textual evidence
- Comparing and contrasting multiple texts on a theme
- Analyzing author's purpose and rhetorical strategies
Writing performance assessments
- Crafting argumentative essays on contemporary issues
- Composing creative pieces (short stories, poetry, scripts)
- Developing research papers with proper citations
- Writing reflective journals on reading or learning experiences
- Creating multimedia presentations combining text and visuals
Differentiation and accommodations
- Ensure equitable access to performance-based assessments
- Address diverse learning needs in English and Language Arts classrooms
- Promote inclusive practices that support all students' success
Scaffolding techniques
- Break complex tasks into manageable steps
- Provide graphic organizers and planning templates
- Offer sentence starters or paragraph frames for writing tasks
- Use think-alouds to model thought processes
- Implement gradual release of responsibility in task completion
Modifications for diverse learners
- Adjust task complexity or length based on individual needs
- Provide options for demonstrating knowledge (written, oral, visual)
- Allow for extended time or multiple sessions to complete tasks
- Offer assistive technology (text-to-speech, speech-to-text)
- Provide simplified or translated instructions when necessary
Cultural considerations
- Select texts and topics that reflect diverse cultural perspectives
- Allow students to incorporate their cultural knowledge into tasks
- Provide opportunities for students to share language experiences
- Consider cultural norms in group work and presentation styles
- Ensure assessment criteria are culturally sensitive and inclusive
Technology integration
- Enhances performance-based assessment in digital environments
- Supports 21st-century skills development in English and Language Arts
- Expands possibilities for creative expression and collaboration
Digital tools for assessment
- Online writing platforms with revision tracking (Google Docs)
- Digital to showcase student work over time (Seesaw)
- Video creation tools for oral presentations (Flipgrid)
- Interactive quizzes and surveys for formative assessment (Kahoot)
- Collaborative mind mapping software for brainstorming (Miro)
Online platforms and resources
- Learning management systems for task distribution and submission
- Digital libraries and databases for research tasks
- Online writing labs for grammar and style support
- Virtual reality environments for immersive language experiences
- Social media platforms for authentic audience interaction
Multimedia performance tasks
- Creating digital storytelling projects combining text, images, and audio
- Developing interactive presentations (Prezi, Genially)
- Producing podcasts or video essays on literary topics
- Designing websites or blogs to showcase writing and analysis
- Crafting digital poetry or hypertext narratives
Scoring and evaluation
- Ensures fair and accurate assessment of student performance
- Aligns evaluation practices with English and Language Arts standards
- Provides meaningful feedback to guide student improvement
Rubric development
- Create clear, specific criteria for each performance level
- Include both content and language-specific elements
- Align rubric categories with task objectives and standards
- Use student-friendly language for purposes
- Incorporate qualitative and quantitative measures as appropriate
Peer and self-assessment
- Train students in using rubrics for evaluation
- Implement structured peer feedback protocols
- Encourage reflective practices through self-assessment
- Use peer assessment to develop critical thinking skills
- Incorporate self-assessment into the revision process
Reliability and validity concerns
- Ensure consistent scoring across different raters
- Conduct norming sessions to calibrate scoring practices
- Use multiple raters for high-stakes assessments
- Align tasks and rubrics with intended learning outcomes
- Regularly review and refine assessment tools for accuracy
Feedback and improvement
- Utilize assessment results to enhance teaching and learning
- Foster a growth mindset in English and Language Arts Education
- Promote ongoing development of language and literacy skills
Formative vs summative use
- Implement ongoing formative assessments to guide instruction
- Use summative assessments to evaluate overall learning outcomes
- Provide opportunities for revision based on
- Balance formative and summative assessments throughout the course
- Use formative data to adjust instruction and support individual needs
Goal-setting and progress monitoring
- Help students set specific, measurable language learning goals
- Use performance data to track progress over time
- Implement regular check-ins to discuss growth and challenges
- Encourage students to maintain language learning journals
- Utilize digital tools to visualize and celebrate progress
Continuous improvement strategies
- Analyze assessment results to identify areas for curriculum enhancement
- Solicit student feedback on assessment effectiveness
- Collaborate with colleagues to refine assessment practices
- Stay updated on current research in performance-based assessment
- Regularly review and update tasks to maintain relevance and engagement
Key Terms to Review (19)
Authentic assessment: Authentic assessment refers to evaluation methods that require students to perform real-world tasks that demonstrate meaningful application of essential knowledge and skills. This type of assessment emphasizes practical and relevant tasks, allowing students to show their understanding and abilities in a more natural context, as opposed to traditional tests that may not accurately reflect a student's competencies. Authentic assessment connects closely with performance-based and portfolio assessments, as both focus on assessing student learning through practical application and reflection of their work.
Backward design: Backward design is an educational planning approach that begins with the end goals of learning and works backward to develop the instructional methods and assessments needed to achieve those outcomes. This method emphasizes aligning assessments and learning experiences to the desired results, ensuring that teaching is purpose-driven and focused on student understanding.
Constructivism: Constructivism is a learning theory that suggests individuals construct knowledge through experiences and reflections on those experiences. This approach emphasizes the importance of active participation, social interaction, and the context in which learning occurs, highlighting that understanding is built rather than transmitted.
Creativity: Creativity is the ability to generate new ideas, solutions, or artistic expressions by thinking outside conventional boundaries. This term encompasses the processes of imagination and innovation, allowing individuals to approach challenges with unique perspectives. In various contexts, creativity is crucial for digital literacy, performance-based assessment, and cross-curricular projects, as it enables learners to effectively utilize technology, demonstrate understanding through practical tasks, and integrate knowledge across different subjects.
Critical Thinking: Critical thinking is the ability to analyze, evaluate, and synthesize information in order to form reasoned judgments and make informed decisions. It involves questioning assumptions, recognizing biases, and considering multiple perspectives, all of which are essential for effective problem-solving and decision-making in various contexts.
Exhibitions: Exhibitions are public displays or presentations showcasing works, projects, or performances, often aimed at demonstrating knowledge, skills, or understanding in a specific area. These events allow individuals to exhibit their learning in tangible ways, often involving a hands-on approach that emphasizes real-world applications of theoretical concepts. By integrating multiple forms of expression and assessment, exhibitions promote deeper learning and critical thinking.
Formative feedback: Formative feedback is a process that provides ongoing information about student performance and learning, allowing both teachers and students to identify areas for improvement. This feedback is typically given during the learning process rather than at the end, which helps shape teaching methods and supports students' growth. It can be verbal or written and aims to enhance understanding and skills through constructive criticism and guidance.
Grant Wiggins: Grant Wiggins is an influential educator and co-author of the widely used framework for understanding by design (UbD), which emphasizes the importance of backward planning in educational assessment and curriculum design. His work focuses on performance-based assessments that allow students to demonstrate their understanding through authentic tasks, rather than traditional testing methods. Wiggins' approach helps educators create cohesive learning experiences that align with desired outcomes and fosters deeper learning in students.
Jay McTighe: Jay McTighe is an educational expert known for his work in curriculum design and assessment. He is particularly recognized for his contributions to the understanding of backward design, which emphasizes starting with desired learning outcomes and planning assessments and instruction accordingly. His approach helps educators create more meaningful learning experiences by aligning assessments with clearly defined goals.
Peer evaluation: Peer evaluation is a process in which students assess each other's work, providing feedback and constructive criticism aimed at improving performance and understanding. This method promotes collaboration, encourages critical thinking, and helps learners reflect on their own work through the lens of others' perspectives, enhancing the learning experience.
Performance criteria: Performance criteria are specific standards or benchmarks used to evaluate and measure the quality of student work or performance in educational settings. They provide clear expectations for what students need to demonstrate in order to achieve desired learning outcomes, making assessments more objective and aligned with educational goals.
Performance-based assessment: Performance-based assessment is an evaluation method that measures students' knowledge and skills through tasks that require them to demonstrate their understanding in real-world contexts. This type of assessment emphasizes practical application over traditional testing, encouraging creativity, critical thinking, and collaboration among students. It plays a significant role in inclusive education by accommodating diverse learning styles and abilities.
Portfolios: Portfolios are collections of student work that showcase progress, achievements, and reflections over time. They serve as a comprehensive assessment tool that allows educators to evaluate learning and skills in a holistic way, providing insights into student growth and individual learning paths.
Reliability: Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of a measurement or assessment over time. In educational contexts, it’s crucial as it helps determine if the results of assessments, whether formative or summative, can be trusted and accurately reflect a student's abilities or knowledge.
Scoring rubrics: Scoring rubrics are assessment tools that outline specific criteria and standards for evaluating student performance on tasks or projects. They provide clear descriptions of what is expected at various levels of achievement, helping both educators and students understand the expectations and how to improve performance. This structured approach promotes consistency in grading and can enhance student learning by providing feedback on strengths and areas for growth.
Self-assessment: Self-assessment is the process by which individuals evaluate their own learning, skills, or performance, reflecting on their strengths and areas for improvement. This practice encourages personal responsibility and self-awareness, enabling learners to set realistic goals and identify resources for growth. By engaging in self-assessment, individuals can enhance their understanding and performance across various educational contexts.
Summative evaluation: Summative evaluation is a method of assessing student learning, skill acquisition, or educational program effectiveness after instruction has occurred. This type of evaluation is often used to determine if educational goals and objectives have been met, typically at the end of an instructional unit, course, or program. It is designed to provide an overall summary of student performance and learning outcomes.
Task design: Task design refers to the process of creating specific tasks or activities that are intended to assess students' performance based on real-world applications of knowledge and skills. This approach emphasizes the importance of aligning tasks with educational goals, ensuring that assessments are not only valid and reliable but also meaningful and engaging for learners. Effective task design incorporates clear criteria, authentic contexts, and opportunities for students to demonstrate their understanding in practical ways.
Validity: Validity refers to the extent to which an assessment accurately measures what it is intended to measure. It encompasses the degree to which inferences made based on assessment results are appropriate, meaningful, and useful. Validity is crucial in ensuring that assessments effectively evaluate the intended knowledge or skills and informs decisions regarding student learning and educational outcomes.