Drug testing and background checks are crucial tools employers use to ensure workplace safety and make informed hiring decisions. These practices help identify potential risks and verify candidate information, but they're subject to complex legal regulations.

Employers must navigate state and federal laws, balancing safety concerns with employee privacy rights. Developing clear policies, obtaining proper consent, and following fair procedures are essential to mitigate legal risks and maintain a compliant screening process.

Types of drug tests

  • Drug tests are used to detect the presence of illegal or prescription drugs in a person's system
  • Different types of drug tests have varying detection windows and accuracy rates

Urine tests

Top images from around the web for Urine tests
Top images from around the web for Urine tests
  • Most common type of drug test used by employers
  • Detects drug use within the past few days to weeks, depending on the substance
  • Can be easily tampered with or diluted, leading to false negative results
  • Requires a private bathroom for sample collection (observed or unobserved)

Hair follicle tests

  • Analyzes a small sample of hair to detect drug use over a longer period (up to 90 days)
  • More difficult to tamper with compared to urine tests
  • Higher cost and longer processing time than other methods
  • May not detect very recent drug use (within the past few days)

Blood tests

  • Highly accurate but invasive and expensive method
  • Detects current intoxication or very recent drug use (within hours to a few days)
  • Requires a trained medical professional to collect the sample
  • Not commonly used by employers due to cost and invasiveness

Saliva tests

  • Collects a saliva sample using a swab or absorbent pad
  • Detects recent drug use (within hours to a few days)
  • Less invasive and easier to administer than blood or urine tests
  • May be less accurate than other methods for some substances
  • Useful for detecting current impairment or very recent drug use

Reasons for drug testing

  • Employers may conduct drug tests for various reasons related to safety, liability, and productivity
  • Drug testing policies should be clearly defined and consistently applied to all employees

Safety-sensitive positions

  • Certain jobs involve high-risk tasks or operating heavy machinery (transportation, construction, healthcare)
  • Drug testing helps ensure that employees in these roles are not impaired on the job
  • Reduces the risk of accidents, injuries, and fatalities caused by drug-related impairment

Workplace accidents

  • Drug tests may be conducted following a workplace accident or injury
  • Helps determine if drug use was a contributing factor to the incident
  • Can impact workers' compensation claims and liability for the employer

Reasonable suspicion

  • Employers may test an employee if there is of drug use based on observable signs and symptoms
  • Signs may include erratic behavior, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, or the odor of drugs or alcohol
  • Supervisors should be trained to recognize and document signs of impairment

Random testing programs

  • Some employers implement random drug testing for all or a subset of employees
  • Helps deter drug use and identify employees with substance abuse issues
  • Must be conducted in a truly random manner without bias or discrimination
  • Commonly used in industries with high safety risks or regulated by federal agencies (DOT)
  • Drug testing laws vary by state and industry, and employers must navigate a complex legal landscape
  • Balancing safety, liability, and is crucial when implementing drug testing policies

State laws on drug testing

  • Some states have specific laws regulating when and how employers can conduct drug tests
  • Restrictions may include requiring reasonable suspicion, limiting random testing, or mandating confirmatory tests
  • Employers must review and comply with applicable state laws in addition to federal regulations

Federal laws and regulations

  • Certain industries, such as transportation and aviation, are subject to federal drug testing regulations (DOT, FAA)
  • The (ADA) prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities, including those with a history of substance abuse who are currently in recovery
  • The (FMLA) may provide job-protected leave for employees seeking treatment for substance abuse disorders

Medical marijuana and drug testing

  • Many states have legalized medical marijuana, creating challenges for employers' drug testing policies
  • Some states prohibit employers from discriminating against employees who use medical marijuana off-duty and in compliance with state laws
  • Employers should review state laws and consider accommodations for employees with valid medical marijuana prescriptions

Disability discrimination and drug testing

  • The ADA protects individuals with disabilities from discrimination, including those with a history of substance abuse who are currently in recovery
  • Employers must provide reasonable accommodations for employees with substance abuse disorders, such as time off for treatment or modified job duties
  • Drug tests must be job-related and consistent with business necessity, and not used to screen out individuals with disabilities

Drug testing policies

  • Developing clear, comprehensive, and legally compliant drug testing policies is essential for employers
  • Policies should be consistently applied and communicated to all employees

Written policy requirements

  • Drug testing policies should be in writing and included in employee handbooks or other policy documents
  • Key components include the purpose of testing, types of tests used, substances tested for, and consequences of positive results
  • Policies should also address confidentiality, privacy, and the appeals process for positive tests

Communicating policies to employees

  • Employers must ensure that all employees are aware of the drug testing policy and have access to the written document
  • New hires should receive a copy of the policy and acknowledge receipt in writing
  • Regular training and reminders can help reinforce the policy and ensure ongoing compliance

Consequences of positive tests

  • Policies should clearly outline the consequences of a positive drug test, which may include disciplinary action, termination, or referral to a substance abuse treatment program
  • Employers should apply consequences consistently and in accordance with the written policy
  • Some states may require employers to offer rehabilitation or treatment options before terminating an employee for a positive test

Confidentiality of test results

  • Drug test results are considered confidential medical information and must be kept separate from general personnel files
  • Access to test results should be limited to those with a legitimate need to know, such as HR professionals or safety managers
  • Employers must ensure that test results are not disclosed to unauthorized individuals or used for discriminatory purposes

Background check basics

  • Background checks are a common tool used to verify information provided by job candidates and identify potential risks
  • Employers must comply with federal and state laws governing background checks, including obtaining consent and providing required disclosures

Types of background checks

  • Criminal history checks: Searches for felony and misdemeanor convictions, arrests, and pending charges
  • Employment verification: Confirms a candidate's employment history, including job titles, dates of employment, and reasons for leaving
  • Education verification: Verifies a candidate's educational background, including degrees earned and attendance dates
  • Credit checks: Reviews a candidate's credit history and financial standing (restricted in some states)
  • Motor vehicle records: Checks a candidate's driving history, including accidents, violations, and license status

Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)

  • The FCRA is a federal law that regulates background checks conducted by third-party consumer reporting agencies (CRAs)
  • Employers must follow specific steps when using CRAs, including obtaining written consent, providing a standalone disclosure, and notifying candidates of adverse actions
  • The FCRA also requires CRAs to maintain accurate and up-to-date information and allows individuals to dispute inaccurate or incomplete records
  • Before conducting a background check through a CRA, employers must obtain written consent from the job candidate
  • A standalone disclosure document must be provided, informing the candidate that a background check will be conducted and may be used to make employment decisions
  • The consent and disclosure cannot be combined with other application materials or include extraneous information

Adverse action procedures

  • If an employer decides not to hire a candidate based on information in a background check, they must follow the FCRA's adverse action process
  • Pre-adverse action: The employer must provide the candidate with a copy of the background check report and a summary of their rights under the FCRA
  • Waiting period: The employer must allow a reasonable amount of time (typically 5-7 days) for the candidate to review and dispute any inaccurate information
  • Adverse action notice: If the employer proceeds with the adverse action, they must provide a final notice to the candidate, including the CRA's contact information and the candidate's right to obtain a free copy of the report

Criminal background checks

  • Criminal background checks are a common type of pre-employment screening, but their use is subject to various legal restrictions and best practices
  • Employers must balance the need to maintain a safe workplace with the rights of job candidates and the risk of discriminatory hiring practices

State and federal laws

  • Some states have laws limiting the use of criminal history information in hiring decisions, such as prohibiting inquiries about arrests without convictions or setting time limits on the age of convictions that can be considered
  • Federal guidance from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recommends that employers conduct and consider the nature and gravity of the offense, the time passed, and the relevance to the job

Ban-the-box legislation

  • Many states and local jurisdictions have enacted "ban-the-box" laws, which prohibit employers from inquiring about criminal history on initial job applications
  • These laws aim to provide fair hiring opportunities for individuals with criminal records by delaying background checks until later in the hiring process
  • Employers must review applicable ban-the-box laws and adjust their hiring practices accordingly

Arrest vs conviction records

  • Arrest records alone generally cannot be used to make employment decisions, as an arrest does not establish guilt
  • Conviction records may be considered, but employers should evaluate the relevance of the conviction to the specific job duties and conduct individualized assessments
  • Some states prohibit or limit the use of certain types of convictions, such as sealed or expunged records

Individualized assessments

  • The EEOC recommends that employers conduct individualized assessments when considering criminal history information
  • Factors to consider include the nature and gravity of the offense, the time passed since the offense or completion of the sentence, and the nature of the job sought
  • Individualized assessments help ensure that criminal history information is used in a job-related and consistent manner, reducing the risk of discrimination claims

Other background checks

  • In addition to criminal history checks, employers may conduct other types of background checks to verify information provided by job candidates and assess their suitability for the position
  • These checks are subject to various legal requirements and best practices

Employment verification

  • Employers may contact a candidate's previous employers to confirm their job titles, dates of employment, and reasons for leaving
  • Some states limit the information that former employers can disclose without the candidate's consent, such as performance evaluations or disciplinary actions
  • Employers should obtain consent from candidates before conducting employment verifications and ensure that the information obtained is job-related and consistent with business necessity

Education verification

  • Education verification confirms a candidate's educational background, including degrees earned, institutions attended, and dates of attendance
  • Employers should obtain consent from candidates before verifying their education and ensure that the information is relevant to the job requirements
  • Some positions may require specific degrees or certifications, making education verification a crucial part of the background check process

Credit checks

  • Credit checks review a candidate's credit history and financial standing, including credit scores, outstanding debts, and payment history
  • The use of credit checks is restricted in some states, and employers must comply with the FCRA's requirements for obtaining consent and providing disclosures
  • Credit checks should only be conducted when the information is job-related and consistent with business necessity, such as positions involving financial responsibilities or access to sensitive data

Motor vehicle records

  • Motor vehicle record checks review a candidate's driving history, including accidents, violations, and license status
  • These checks are commonly used for positions that require driving as part of the job duties, such as delivery drivers or sales representatives
  • Employers must obtain consent from candidates before conducting motor vehicle record checks and ensure that the information obtained is job-related and consistent with business necessity
  • Employers face various legal risks when conducting background checks and making hiring decisions based on the results
  • Developing compliant policies and following best practices can help mitigate these risks and ensure fair and non-discriminatory hiring practices

Discrimination claims

  • Employers must ensure that their use of background check information does not result in or disparate treatment of protected classes, such as race, national origin, or disability
  • Disparate impact occurs when a facially neutral policy or practice disproportionately affects a protected class, while disparate treatment involves intentional discrimination based on a protected characteristic
  • To avoid discrimination claims, employers should consistently apply background check policies, conduct individualized assessments, and ensure that hiring criteria are job-related and consistent with business necessity

Negligent hiring and retention

  • Employers have a legal duty to exercise reasonable care in hiring and retaining employees to ensure a safe workplace
  • Failure to conduct appropriate background checks or to act on information revealing potential risks can lead to negligent hiring or retention claims if an employee causes harm to others
  • To mitigate these risks, employers should conduct thorough background checks, investigate any red flags, and take appropriate action when necessary

Developing compliant policies

  • Employers should develop written background check policies that comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws
  • Key components of a compliant policy include obtaining consent, providing required disclosures, following , and ensuring the confidentiality of background check information
  • Policies should be regularly reviewed and updated to reflect changes in legal requirements and best practices

Working with background check providers

  • Many employers choose to work with third-party background check providers (CRAs) to conduct screenings on their behalf
  • When selecting a CRA, employers should ensure that the provider complies with the FCRA and other applicable laws, maintains accurate and up-to-date information, and follows best practices for data security and privacy
  • Employers should also have a clear understanding of the services provided by the CRA, the turnaround time for results, and the process for disputing inaccurate or incomplete information

Key Terms to Review (25)

ADA compliance: ADA compliance refers to the adherence to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which mandates that all individuals, regardless of their disabilities, have equal access to employment opportunities and workplaces. This includes ensuring that drug testing and background checks do not discriminate against individuals with disabilities and that reasonable accommodations are provided when necessary to facilitate their participation in these processes.
Adverse Action Procedures: Adverse action procedures refer to the legal processes that employers must follow when they decide to take negative employment actions against an employee, such as termination, demotion, or suspension. These procedures ensure that the employee is given notice and an opportunity to respond before the final decision is made, which is particularly relevant in contexts like drug testing and background checks where such actions may arise from the results of these assessments.
Adverse Employment Action: Adverse employment action refers to any action taken by an employer that negatively affects an employee's job status or work environment. This can include termination, demotion, salary reductions, or even less obvious actions like unfair assignments or a hostile work environment. Recognizing what constitutes adverse employment action is crucial for understanding various legal protections and employee rights.
Americans with Disabilities Act: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a landmark piece of legislation enacted in 1990 that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in various aspects of public life, including employment, transportation, public accommodations, and telecommunications. This law ensures that people with disabilities have the same rights and opportunities as everyone else, impacting how employers must handle job applicants and employees with disabilities.
Ban-the-box legislation: Ban-the-box legislation refers to laws that prohibit employers from asking about a job applicant's criminal history on initial job applications. This movement aims to reduce barriers for individuals with criminal records, allowing them to be evaluated based on their qualifications rather than their past mistakes. It connects to broader themes of discrimination, fair hiring practices, and the impact of criminal history on employment opportunities.
Blood Tests: Blood tests are medical procedures that analyze blood samples to detect substances or conditions, including drug use and health issues. In the context of employment law, these tests are often used to screen candidates or current employees for illegal drug use or other health-related concerns, making them a key component of workplace drug testing and background checks.
Consent and Disclosure Requirements: Consent and disclosure requirements refer to the legal obligations that employers must adhere to when conducting drug testing and background checks on employees or job applicants. These requirements ensure that individuals are informed about the testing procedures, the reasons for the tests, and that they provide explicit consent before any testing occurs. This fosters transparency and protects the privacy rights of individuals involved in the employment process.
Credit history check: A credit history check is an evaluation of an individual's credit records, typically conducted by employers, lenders, or rental agencies to assess financial responsibility and reliability. This check provides insights into an individual's borrowing history, including payment patterns, outstanding debts, and credit score, which can impact hiring decisions or loan approvals.
Criminal Background Check: A criminal background check is a process used to investigate a person's criminal history by reviewing their past criminal records, including arrests, convictions, and incarceration. This check is often utilized by employers to ensure a safe and trustworthy workplace, particularly for positions that involve significant responsibility or access to sensitive information.
Disability discrimination: Disability discrimination occurs when an individual is treated unfavorably because of a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. This term is critical in understanding the legal protections that exist for individuals with disabilities, particularly regarding their rights to equal opportunity in employment and public services. It emphasizes the importance of accommodating individuals with disabilities and ensuring that they are not excluded from participation based on their condition.
Disparate impact: Disparate impact refers to a legal theory in employment law where a seemingly neutral policy or practice disproportionately affects a protected group, even if there is no intent to discriminate. This concept highlights that the effects of employment practices can be discriminatory, regardless of the employer's intent, and plays a significant role in evaluating the fairness of hiring, promotion, and workplace policies.
Employee Rights: Employee rights refer to the legal and moral entitlements that employees have within the workplace, protecting them from unfair treatment, discrimination, and violation of personal freedoms. These rights are foundational to creating a safe and equitable working environment, ensuring that employees are treated fairly and with respect. They encompass various aspects such as job security, safety, privacy, and protection against retaliation.
Fair Credit Reporting Act: The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) is a federal law that regulates how consumer reporting agencies collect, disseminate, and use consumer information. It aims to ensure accuracy, fairness, and privacy in the handling of consumers' personal information. The FCRA is significant in various employment contexts, especially regarding background checks and the treatment of references, as it establishes guidelines for employers to follow when they seek information about a potential employee's credit history or background.
Family and Medical Leave Act: The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is a federal law that allows eligible employees to take unpaid, job-protected leave for specified family and medical reasons. This law ensures that employees can take time off for situations like the birth of a child, adoption, or serious health conditions, while guaranteeing their job security upon return. It plays a crucial role in balancing work and family responsibilities, impacting various aspects of employment relationships, including protections against termination and implications for employee benefits.
Hair follicle testing: Hair follicle testing is a method used to detect the presence of drugs in an individual's system by analyzing a sample of their hair. This type of testing can provide a longer detection window for substance use compared to urine tests, as drugs can be detected in hair for months after ingestion, depending on the length of the hair sample. This method is often utilized in various contexts, including employment drug screening, due to its ability to reveal past drug use patterns.
Individualized assessments: Individualized assessments refer to the tailored evaluation methods used to evaluate a person's qualifications or suitability for a position, taking into account their unique characteristics and experiences. This approach helps employers make informed decisions by considering the specific context of each individual, rather than relying solely on standardized tests or general criteria. Such assessments often include interviews, skills tests, and background checks that focus on the applicant's capabilities and potential fit within the organization.
Medical marijuana laws: Medical marijuana laws are regulations that allow patients with qualifying medical conditions to use marijuana for therapeutic purposes. These laws vary by state, including provisions for patient registration, possession limits, and the establishment of licensed dispensaries to provide access to medical cannabis. They also address the legality of marijuana use in the workplace, particularly in relation to drug testing and employee rights.
NLRB v. Fennell: NLRB v. Fennell is a significant legal case involving the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) that addressed the limits of an employer's rights to conduct drug testing on employees. The case explored how employers balance their interests in maintaining a safe workplace against the rights of employees, particularly concerning privacy and due process during drug testing and background checks.
Pre-employment screening: Pre-employment screening refers to the process employers use to evaluate potential employees before making a hiring decision. This process often includes drug testing and background checks to assess candidates' qualifications, criminal history, and overall suitability for a job. By implementing pre-employment screening, companies aim to minimize risk, ensure workplace safety, and find the best candidates for their specific needs.
Privacy concerns: Privacy concerns refer to the issues and worries surrounding the protection of an individual's personal information, particularly regarding how it is collected, used, and shared by employers. In the context of drug testing and background checks, these concerns arise when employees fear that their sensitive information may be misused or disclosed without their consent, leading to potential discrimination or violation of personal rights.
Random testing programs: Random testing programs are systematic procedures used by organizations to randomly select employees for drug testing without prior notice. These programs are designed to deter substance abuse in the workplace and ensure a safe environment for all employees. By implementing such programs, employers aim to promote a culture of accountability and reduce potential risks associated with drug use among staff.
Reasonable suspicion: Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard that allows an employer to take action when there is a belief, based on specific facts and circumstances, that an employee may be engaging in illegal or inappropriate conduct, such as substance abuse. This concept is essential in determining when drug testing or background checks can be legitimately conducted without violating an employee's rights. The threshold for reasonable suspicion is lower than that required for probable cause, allowing for proactive measures to ensure workplace safety and integrity.
Saliva tests: Saliva tests are a method of drug testing that involves analyzing a person's saliva to detect the presence of drugs or their metabolites. This type of testing is gaining popularity because it is non-invasive, quick, and can provide immediate results, making it a convenient option for employers conducting drug testing as part of their employment screening process.
Schmerber v. California: Schmerber v. California is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case from 1966 that addressed the legality of warrantless blood tests for suspected drunk drivers. The Court held that the extraction of blood from a person without a warrant does not violate the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, if there are exigent circumstances that justify such action. This case significantly impacts the context of drug testing and background checks, as it sets a precedent for the legality of testing without consent in certain situations.
Urinalysis: Urinalysis is a diagnostic test that examines the content and properties of urine, typically used to detect substances such as drugs or other health-related issues. This test can reveal the presence of illegal drugs, prescription medications, and even metabolites that indicate recent substance use, making it a crucial tool in drug testing protocols within various employment contexts.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.