10.1 Wrongful termination and constructive discharge

Wrongful termination occurs when an employer illegally fires an employee, violating laws, public policy, or contract terms. This can include discrimination, retaliation, or breaching good faith. Understanding these concepts is crucial for both employers and employees to navigate workplace rights and responsibilities.

Constructive discharge happens when an employer creates such unbearable working conditions that a reasonable employee would feel forced to quit. This is treated as a firing, allowing wrongful termination claims even without formal termination. Both concepts highlight the importance of fair employment practices and legal protections for workers.

Definition of wrongful termination

• Wrongful termination is a legal term that refers to the unlawful firing of an employee by an employer
• Occurs when an employer terminates an employee for reasons that violate state or federal law, public policy, or the terms of an employment contract
• Can also happen when an employer fires an employee in retaliation for engaging in legally protected activities (filing a complaint, participating in an investigation)

Reasons for wrongful termination

Discrimination based on protected classes

Top images from around the web for Discrimination based on protected classes

• 

  Racial discrimination has always been around us - Youth Voices View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Hidden Facts of Disability Infographic | Disability Statisitics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  California Labor Law: Discrimination Caused Wrongful Termination? View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Racial discrimination has always been around us - Youth Voices View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Hidden Facts of Disability Infographic | Disability Statisitics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Discrimination based on protected classes

• 

  Racial discrimination has always been around us - Youth Voices View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Hidden Facts of Disability Infographic | Disability Statisitics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  California Labor Law: Discrimination Caused Wrongful Termination? View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Racial discrimination has always been around us - Youth Voices View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Hidden Facts of Disability Infographic | Disability Statisitics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Terminating an employee based on their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or genetic information violates federal anti-discrimination laws (Title VII, ADA, ADEA)
• Employers cannot fire employees because of their membership in a protected class or due to stereotypes associated with that class
• Examples: firing an employee because of their skin color, refusing to promote older workers, terminating someone after learning of their disability

Retaliation for protected activities

• Employers are prohibited from firing employees in retaliation for engaging in legally protected activities
• Protected activities include filing a discrimination complaint, participating in an investigation, reporting safety violations, or taking protected leave (FMLA)
• Retaliation claims require showing a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse employment action
• Example: terminating an employee shortly after they filed a sexual harassment complaint against a supervisor

Violation of employment contracts

• If an employee has a written employment contract, the employer must follow the terms of that contract when terminating the employee
• Firing an employee in violation of the contract terms (without cause, before the end of the contract term) can constitute wrongful termination
• Implied contracts based on employee handbooks, policies, or oral promises may also give rise to wrongful termination claims
• Example: firing an employee with a three-year contract after one year without the required cause

Breach of good faith and fair dealing

• Some states recognize an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in employment relationships
• Employers violate this covenant by acting in bad faith or unfairly when terminating employees
• Examples: firing an employee to avoid paying earned commissions, misleading an employee about job security, or terminating someone just before their pension vests
• Not all states recognize this cause of action, and its scope varies by jurisdiction

Constructive discharge

Definition of constructive discharge

• Constructive discharge occurs when an employer creates such intolerable working conditions that a reasonable employee would feel compelled to resign
• Treats the employee's resignation as a firing because the employer's actions forced the employee to quit
• Allows employees to pursue wrongful termination claims even if they were not formally fired

Elements of constructive discharge claim

• Employee must prove that the employer deliberately created intolerable working conditions with the intent to force the employee to resign
• Intolerable conditions must be sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the terms and conditions of employment
• Employee must show that a reasonable person in their position would have felt compelled to resign
• Employee must actually resign in response to the intolerable conditions

Intolerable working conditions

• Intolerable conditions can include harassment, discrimination, retaliation, or other severe mistreatment
• Single incidents are generally insufficient unless extremely egregious (sexual assault)
• Conditions must be more than minor inconveniences or typical workplace stress
• Examples: pervasive sexual harassment, demotion with significant pay cut, dangerous working conditions

Reasonable employee standard

• Courts apply an objective standard of whether a reasonable employee in the plaintiff's position would have felt compelled to resign
• Factors include the severity and duration of the conditions, whether the employer was notified of the issues, and any attempts to resolve the problem
• Employee's subjective feelings are not enough; conditions must be objectively intolerable
• Reasonable employee standard prevents constructive discharge claims based on an employee's unreasonable sensitivity or overreaction

Remedies for wrongful termination

Reinstatement of employment

• Courts may order the employer to reinstate the wrongfully terminated employee to their former position
• Reinstatement is not always practical or desirable, especially if there is hostility or mistrust between the parties
• Alternative remedies include front pay (compensation for future lost wages) or a court-ordered severance package

Back pay and lost benefits

• Wrongfully terminated employees can recover the wages and benefits they lost due to the termination
• Back pay includes the salary, commissions, bonuses, and other compensation the employee would have earned from the date of termination to the date of judgment
• Employees are entitled to the value of lost benefits like health insurance, retirement contributions, and vacation time

Compensatory damages

• Compensatory damages aim to make the employee whole for the harm caused by the wrongful termination
• Include economic damages like job search expenses, medical bills, and other out-of-pocket costs resulting from the termination
• Also include non-economic damages for emotional distress, humiliation, and reputational harm
• Amounts vary based on the severity of the harm and the strength of the evidence

Punitive damages

• In cases of particularly egregious or malicious conduct, courts may award punitive damages to punish the employer and deter future wrongdoing
• Punitive damages are not available in all cases and are subject to constitutional limits
• Factors include the reprehensibility of the employer's conduct, the ratio of punitive to compensatory damages, and the employer's financial condition
• Punitive damages can significantly increase the potential liability for employers in wrongful termination cases

Defenses against wrongful termination claims

At-will employment doctrine

• Most employment relationships in the US are at-will, meaning the employer can terminate the employee at any time for any reason (except illegal reasons)
• At-will doctrine creates a presumption that the termination was lawful unless the employee can prove an exception applies
• Exceptions to at-will employment include discrimination, retaliation, violation of public policy, or breach of contract
• Employers often raise the at-will doctrine as a defense to argue that the termination was not wrongful

Legitimate non-discriminatory reasons

• If an employee claims discrimination, the employer can defend by showing that it had a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the termination
• Legitimate reasons can include poor performance, misconduct, layoffs due to economic conditions, or elimination of the employee's position
• Employer must provide evidence to support the legitimate reason and show that it was the true reason for the termination
• Employee can still prevail by proving that the stated reason is a pretext for discrimination

Employee misconduct or poor performance

• Employers can defend wrongful termination claims by showing that the employee engaged in misconduct or had poor job performance
• Misconduct can include violating company policies, insubordination, theft, or other unacceptable behavior
• Poor performance includes failing to meet job requirements, making errors, or not achieving goals
• Employer must have documentation of the misconduct or poor performance and show that it was the reason for the termination
• Consistent enforcement of policies and progressive discipline can strengthen this defense

Statute of limitations

• Wrongful termination claims are subject to statutes of limitations that set deadlines for filing lawsuits
• Limitations periods vary by state and by the type of claim (discrimination vs. breach of contract)
• Employees must file claims with the EEOC or state agency within 180/300 days of the termination for discrimination claims
• Failure to file within the applicable deadline can bar the claim, providing a complete defense for the employer
• Employers should raise the statute of limitations defense early in the case to avoid waiving it

Proving wrongful termination

Burden of proof on employee

• In a wrongful termination lawsuit, the employee has the burden of proving that the termination was unlawful
• Employee must provide evidence to support each element of their claim (discrimination, retaliation, breach of contract)
• Burden of proof is typically "preponderance of the evidence" - more likely than not that the termination was wrongful
• If the employee cannot meet their burden, the employer will prevail without having to present any evidence

Direct vs circumstantial evidence

• Employees can prove wrongful termination using direct or circumstantial evidence
• Direct evidence includes statements or actions by the employer that directly show discriminatory intent or other unlawful motive
• Circumstantial evidence includes patterns of treatment, timing of events, or other facts that suggest an unlawful motive
• Most cases rely on circumstantial evidence because direct evidence of discrimination or retaliation is rare

Role of documentation and witnesses

• Documentation and witness testimony play a crucial role in proving wrongful termination claims
• Employees should gather documents like performance reviews, disciplinary notices, emails, or other records that support their claim
• Witnesses can provide testimony about the employee's job performance, the employer's statements or actions, or other relevant events
• Employers should maintain accurate and consistent documentation of performance issues, disciplinary actions, and termination decisions

Importance of consistent policies and practices

• Consistent application of employment policies and practices can help employers defend against wrongful termination claims
• Treating similarly situated employees differently can be evidence of discrimination or retaliation
• Applying policies inconsistently or deviating from established practices can undermine the employer's legitimate reasons for the termination
• Employers should have clear, written policies and train managers to apply them consistently to all employees

Preventing wrongful termination

Clear employment policies and procedures

• Employers should have clear, written policies and procedures for hiring, performance management, discipline, and termination
• Policies should be communicated to all employees and applied consistently across the organization
• Having clear policies helps ensure fair treatment of employees and provides a roadmap for managers to follow
• Policies can also serve as evidence of the employer's legitimate expectations and reasons for termination

Regular performance evaluations and feedback

• Conducting regular performance evaluations and providing feedback to employees can prevent wrongful termination claims
• Evaluations document the employee's strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement
• Providing feedback helps employees understand the employer's expectations and gives them an opportunity to address issues
• If termination becomes necessary, the employer can point to the evaluations as evidence of the employee's poor performance

Consistent discipline and termination processes

• Employers should have a consistent process for disciplining and terminating employees
• Progressive discipline policies that use verbal warnings, written warnings, and suspensions before termination can demonstrate fairness
• Documenting each step of the disciplinary process creates a record of the employee's issues and the employer's attempts to address them
• Following a consistent termination process (notice, reason for termination, opportunity to respond) can reduce the risk of wrongful termination claims

Training for managers and supervisors

• Training managers and supervisors on employment laws, company policies, and best practices can prevent wrongful termination
• Managers should understand the protected classes, prohibited reasons for termination, and the importance of consistency
• Training on how to document performance issues, provide feedback, and follow disciplinary procedures is essential
• Managers should also be trained on how to handle complaints of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation to avoid retaliatory terminations

Wrongful termination vs lawful termination

Distinguishing between lawful and unlawful reasons

• Not all terminations are wrongful, even if they seem unfair or unjustified to the employee
• Lawful reasons for termination include poor performance, misconduct, layoffs, or other legitimate business reasons
• Unlawful reasons for termination include discrimination, retaliation, violation of public policy, or breach of contract
• Employers must be able to articulate a clear, lawful reason for the termination and provide supporting evidence

Importance of documentation and communication

• Proper documentation and communication can help distinguish between lawful and wrongful terminations
• Documenting performance issues, disciplinary actions, and the reason for termination creates a record of the employer's legitimate reasons
• Communicating the reason for termination to the employee can prevent misunderstandings or allegations of unlawful motives
• Lack of documentation or inconsistent communication can create the appearance of a wrongful termination

Consulting with legal counsel

• Employers should consult with legal counsel before terminating employees to ensure compliance with applicable laws
• Attorneys can review the reasons for termination, assess the risk of a wrongful termination claim, and recommend best practices
• Legal counsel can also help investigate complaints of discrimination or retaliation and advise on how to handle them
• Involving attorneys in the termination process can demonstrate the employer's good faith efforts to comply with the law

State laws on wrongful termination

Variations in state employment laws

• While federal laws set minimum standards for wrongful termination, states can provide greater protections for employees
• Some states have broader anti-discrimination laws that cover additional protected classes (sexual orientation, marital status)
• States may have different statutes of limitations, remedies, or procedural requirements for wrongful termination claims
• Employers must comply with both federal and state laws in the states where they operate

Common law vs statutory protections

• Some states recognize common law claims for wrongful termination based on public policy or implied contracts
• Common law claims are based on court decisions and legal principles rather than specific statutes
• Statutory protections are created by state legislatures and provide specific rights and remedies for employees
• Examples of statutory protections include whistleblower laws, family and medical leave laws, or anti-retaliation provisions

Preemption by federal laws

• In some cases, federal laws may preempt or supersede state laws on wrongful termination
• Federal preemption occurs when a federal law conflicts with a state law or occupies the field of regulation
• For example, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) preempts state laws that relate to employee benefit plans
• Employers must be aware of potential preemption issues and ensure compliance with applicable federal laws

Famous wrongful termination cases

Significant court decisions and precedents

• Several landmark court cases have shaped the development of wrongful termination law
• Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. (1988): California Supreme Court recognized the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in employment contracts
• Gantt v. Sentry Insurance (1992): California Supreme Court limited public policy wrongful termination claims to policies based on statutes or constitutional provisions
• Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth (1998): US Supreme Court established the standard for employer liability in sexual harassment cases
• Recent cases continue to refine the standards for proving discrimination, retaliation, and other wrongful termination claims

Impact on employment law and practices

• Significant wrongful termination cases have had a profound impact on employment law and HR practices
• Cases have clarified the scope of protected classes, the elements of discrimination and retaliation claims, and the defenses available to employers
• Decisions have also influenced the development of HR best practices, such as anti-harassment policies, complaint procedures, and training programs
• Employers must stay up-to-date on legal developments and adapt their policies and practices accordingly to minimize the risk of wrongful termination claims

Future developments in wrongful termination law

Emerging issues and trends

• Wrongful termination law continues to evolve as new issues and trends emerge in the workplace
• The #MeToo movement has brought renewed focus to sexual harassment and retaliation claims
• The COVID-19 pandemic has raised questions about employee safety, remote work, and layoffs
• Increasing use of artificial intelligence and algorithms in hiring and performance evaluations may lead to new forms of discrimination
• Employers must be proactive in addressing these emerging issues and ensuring compliance with changing laws and regulations

Potential changes to laws and regulations

• Federal and state lawmakers may propose changes to employment laws in response to emerging issues and trends
• Possible changes could include expanding protected classes, strengthening anti-retaliation provisions, or limiting the use of non-disclosure agreements
• Courts may also issue new decisions that clarify or modify existing legal standards for wrongful termination claims
• Employers should monitor legislative and regulatory developments and be prepared to adapt their policies and practices as needed
• Staying informed about potential changes can help employers minimize the risk of wrongful termination claims and maintain a fair and compliant workplace.