🤙🏼Earthquake Engineering Unit 13 – Major Earthquake Case Studies & Lessons

Major earthquake case studies offer valuable insights into seismic events and their impacts. By examining key earthquakes, we can understand geological contexts, seismic characteristics, and structural damage patterns. These studies help us analyze human and economic impacts, evaluate emergency responses, and derive engineering lessons. Lessons learned from past earthquakes inform future preparedness strategies. These include developing risk-informed land-use policies, promoting community awareness, investing in early warning systems, and enhancing infrastructure resilience. By applying these lessons, we can better mitigate seismic risks and improve earthquake resilience.

Key Earthquake Events

  • 1906 San Francisco earthquake (magnitude 7.8) ruptured along the San Andreas Fault, causing widespread destruction and fires
  • 1923 Great Kanto earthquake (magnitude 7.9) struck the Tokyo-Yokohama metropolitan area, resulting in significant damage and loss of life
  • 1960 Great Chilean earthquake (magnitude 9.5) remains the largest recorded earthquake in history, triggering tsunamis and landslides
  • 1964 Great Alaska earthquake (magnitude 9.2) caused extensive damage to infrastructure and generated tsunamis that affected the U.S. West Coast
  • 1976 Tangshan earthquake in China (magnitude 7.6) resulted in the highest death toll of any earthquake in the 20th century
  • 1985 Mexico City earthquake (magnitude 8.0) caused severe damage to buildings due to the city's unique geological conditions
  • 1995 Great Hanshin earthquake (magnitude 6.9) struck the Kobe region of Japan, exposing vulnerabilities in modern urban infrastructure
  • 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami (magnitude 9.1) affected multiple countries, highlighting the need for improved early warning systems

Geological Context

  • Tectonic setting plays a crucial role in determining the location and frequency of earthquakes
    • Plate boundaries, such as convergent (subduction zones), divergent (mid-ocean ridges), and transform (strike-slip faults) boundaries, are prone to seismic activity
  • Local geology influences ground motion characteristics and site effects
    • Soft soil conditions can amplify seismic waves and prolong shaking duration
    • Proximity to the fault rupture can result in higher ground accelerations and more severe damage
  • Seismic hazard assessment involves identifying potential seismic sources, estimating their recurrence intervals, and characterizing the expected ground motions
  • Paleoseismology studies ancient earthquakes by examining geologic evidence, such as fault scarps and displaced sedimentary layers, to extend the seismic record beyond instrumental data
  • Microzonation maps provide detailed information on local soil conditions and expected ground motion amplification, aiding in urban planning and seismic design

Seismic Characteristics

  • Magnitude is a measure of the energy released by an earthquake, typically expressed using the moment magnitude scale (Mw)
    • Moment magnitude is based on the seismic moment, which considers the fault area, average slip, and rock rigidity
  • Intensity describes the observed effects of an earthquake at a specific location, often measured using the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale
  • Ground motion parameters, such as peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), and spectral accelerations (SA), quantify the severity of shaking at a site
  • Seismic waves, including body waves (P and S waves) and surface waves (Rayleigh and Love waves), propagate through the Earth's interior and along its surface
    • P waves are compressional waves that travel fastest and arrive first at a seismic station
    • S waves are shear waves that cause the most damage due to their higher amplitudes and longer durations
  • Seismic hazard curves illustrate the probability of exceeding various ground motion levels at a specific site over a given time period
  • Seismic risk assessment combines the seismic hazard with the vulnerability of structures and potential consequences to estimate the expected losses

Structural Damage Analysis

  • Building typology and construction materials significantly influence the seismic performance of structures
    • Unreinforced masonry buildings are highly vulnerable to collapse due to their brittle behavior and lack of ductility
    • Non-ductile concrete frames with insufficient reinforcement and poor detailing can experience sudden failures
  • Structural irregularities, such as soft stories, torsional irregularities, and vertical discontinuities, can concentrate damage and lead to localized failures
  • Soil-structure interaction (SSI) effects can modify the seismic response of structures, particularly for tall buildings and those founded on soft soils
  • Liquefaction, a phenomenon where saturated loose soils lose strength and behave like a liquid during strong shaking, can cause foundation failures and differential settlements
  • Nonstructural components, such as facades, partitions, and mechanical systems, can pose significant hazards and contribute to economic losses
  • Performance-based seismic design aims to ensure that structures meet specific performance objectives under different levels of seismic hazard
    • Performance levels can range from immediate occupancy to life safety and collapse prevention

Human and Economic Impact

  • Casualties, including fatalities and injuries, are the most tragic consequence of earthquakes
    • Factors influencing casualties include building collapse, falling debris, and secondary hazards like fires and tsunamis
  • Displacement of affected populations can lead to long-term social and economic challenges
    • Temporary shelters and transitional housing are often required to accommodate displaced individuals and families
  • Economic losses encompass direct costs (structural and nonstructural damage) and indirect costs (business interruption, supply chain disruptions)
  • Infrastructure damage, including transportation networks, utilities, and critical facilities, can hinder emergency response and recovery efforts
  • Psychological trauma and mental health issues can persist long after the physical impact of the earthquake
  • Disproportionate impact on vulnerable communities, such as those with lower socioeconomic status or marginalized populations, highlights the need for equitable disaster risk reduction strategies

Emergency Response Evaluation

  • Rapid damage assessment is crucial for prioritizing search and rescue operations and allocating resources effectively
    • Remote sensing techniques, such as satellite imagery and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), can provide valuable information for rapid damage mapping
  • Search and rescue efforts focus on locating and extracting survivors trapped in collapsed structures
    • Specialized teams, including urban search and rescue (USAR) units, are trained to operate in complex and hazardous environments
  • Medical response involves treating injuries, managing chronic health conditions, and preventing disease outbreaks in the aftermath of an earthquake
    • Field hospitals and mobile medical units can be deployed to provide emergency healthcare services
  • Shelter and relief management ensures that affected populations have access to safe shelter, food, water, and basic necessities
    • Coordination among government agencies, NGOs, and community organizations is essential for effective relief distribution
  • Communication and information management systems are vital for disseminating warnings, coordinating response efforts, and keeping the public informed
    • Social media platforms can play a significant role in crowdsourcing information and facilitating community-driven response initiatives

Engineering Lessons Learned

  • Importance of seismic design codes and their regular updates based on the latest research findings and lessons learned from past earthquakes
    • Codes provide minimum requirements for the design and construction of structures to ensure life safety and reduce damage
  • Need for retrofitting and strengthening of existing vulnerable buildings, particularly those built before modern seismic codes were implemented
    • Retrofit techniques can include adding shear walls, braces, or base isolation systems to improve seismic performance
  • Significance of ductile detailing and capacity design principles in promoting the overall stability and integrity of structures during strong shaking
    • Ductile detailing ensures that structural elements can undergo significant deformations without losing strength
  • Role of innovative technologies, such as seismic isolation and energy dissipation devices, in enhancing the seismic resilience of structures
    • Base isolation systems decouple the structure from the ground motion, reducing the seismic forces transmitted to the building
    • Energy dissipation devices, like viscous dampers or friction dampers, absorb seismic energy and limit the damage to structural elements
  • Importance of geotechnical considerations, such as site-specific ground response analysis and foundation design, in mitigating seismic risks
    • Ground improvement techniques, like deep soil mixing or stone columns, can be used to stabilize weak soils and reduce liquefaction potential

Future Preparedness Strategies

  • Developing and implementing risk-informed land-use planning policies to guide development away from high-seismic-hazard areas
    • Microzonation maps can inform land-use decisions and help identify areas suitable for development or requiring special design considerations
  • Promoting community awareness and education programs to enhance public understanding of seismic risks and preparedness measures
    • Earthquake drills and training sessions can help individuals and communities practice response procedures and identify areas for improvement
  • Investing in early warning systems that can provide seconds to minutes of advance notice before strong shaking arrives
    • Early warning systems can be used to trigger automated actions, such as shutting down critical infrastructure or broadcasting alerts to the public
  • Enhancing the resilience of critical infrastructure systems, such as hospitals, schools, and lifelines (power, water, transportation), through seismic upgrades and redundancy measures
    • Resilient infrastructure can maintain functionality or recover quickly after an earthquake, reducing the overall impact on communities
  • Encouraging the development and adoption of new technologies, such as advanced sensors, data analytics, and decision support tools, to improve real-time monitoring and post-earthquake assessment
    • Smart sensors and Internet of Things (IoT) devices can provide valuable data for rapid damage assessment and prioritization of response efforts
  • Fostering interdisciplinary collaboration among engineers, scientists, policymakers, and communities to develop holistic and sustainable seismic resilience strategies
    • Participatory approaches that engage stakeholders throughout the planning and implementation process can lead to more effective and socially acceptable solutions


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.