4.3 Gilbert-Varshamov Bound

The Gilbert-Varshamov bound is a key tool in coding theory, giving a lower limit on the size of error-correcting codes. It shows that good codes exist, even if we can't always build them. This bound helps us understand what's possible in code design.

The bound links code length, size, and minimum distance. It proves we can make codes with certain features, guiding code creators. The bound also shows how code size and error-fixing power trade off as code length grows.

Gilbert-Varshamov Bound and Existence

Defining the Gilbert-Varshamov Bound

Top images from around the web for Defining the Gilbert-Varshamov Bound

• 

  Quantum coding with finite resources | Nature Communications View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Borne de Gilbert-Varshamov — Wikipédia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  coding theory - Given binary codewords find generator matrix - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Quantum coding with finite resources | Nature Communications View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Borne de Gilbert-Varshamov — Wikipédia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Defining the Gilbert-Varshamov Bound

• 

  Quantum coding with finite resources | Nature Communications View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Borne de Gilbert-Varshamov — Wikipédia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  coding theory - Given binary codewords find generator matrix - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Quantum coding with finite resources | Nature Communications View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Borne de Gilbert-Varshamov — Wikipédia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• States for an $(n, M, d)$ code over an alphabet of size $q$, the following inequality must hold: $\sum_{i=0}^{d-1} \binom{n}{i}(q-1)^i \leq q^n/M$
• Provides a lower bound on the maximum number of codewords $M$ in a code with length $n$ and minimum distance $d$ over an alphabet of size $q$
• Derived by counting the maximum number of distinct $n$-tuples that can exist in a code with minimum distance $d$
• Can be used to prove the existence of codes with certain parameters ($n$, $M$, $d$) without explicitly constructing them

Existence Bound and Asymptotic Behavior

• Gilbert-Varshamov bound implies the existence of codes meeting certain parameters
• If $\sum_{i=0}^{d-1} \binom{n}{i}(q-1)^i < q^n$, then there exists an $(n, M, d)$ code with $M > \lfloor q^n / \sum_{i=0}^{d-1} \binom{n}{i}(q-1)^i \rfloor$
• Asymptotically, the Gilbert-Varshamov bound shows that for a fixed code rate $R = \log_q(M)/n$, there exist codes with relative minimum distance $\delta = d/n$ approaching the Gilbert-Varshamov bound as $n \to \infty$
• The asymptotic form of the Gilbert-Varshamov bound is given by $R \leq 1 - H_q(\delta)$, where $H_q(\delta)$ is the $q$-ary entropy function

Relationship to Minimum Distance

• The Gilbert-Varshamov bound relates the code parameters $n$, $M$, and $d$
• For a fixed code length $n$ and alphabet size $q$, increasing the minimum distance $d$ leads to a smaller upper bound on the number of codewords $M$
• Conversely, for a fixed $n$ and $M$, the Gilbert-Varshamov bound provides a lower bound on the maximum achievable minimum distance $d$
• Codes meeting the Gilbert-Varshamov bound are considered optimal in terms of balancing the trade-off between code rate (related to $M$) and error-correcting capability (determined by $d$)

Random Coding and Code Construction

Random Coding Argument

• A probabilistic method used to prove the existence of codes with certain properties
• Involves randomly generating a large number of codes and showing that, with high probability, at least one of them satisfies the desired properties
• Used to prove the achievability of the Gilbert-Varshamov bound
• Demonstrates the existence of good codes without explicitly constructing them

Code Construction Techniques

• Explicit methods for constructing codes that meet or approach the Gilbert-Varshamov bound
• Examples include:
  • Algebraic codes (Reed-Solomon codes, BCH codes, Goppa codes)
  • Concatenated codes (combining an inner and outer code)
  • Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes
  • Polar codes
• Constructive methods provide practical codes that can be efficiently encoded and decoded
• Some construction techniques (LDPC codes, Polar codes) have been shown to achieve capacity for certain channels

Code Rate and Performance

• Code rate $R = \log_q(M)/n$ measures the efficiency of the code in terms of information bits per coded symbol
• Higher code rates indicate more efficient data transmission but typically lower error-correcting capability
• Lower code rates provide better error correction at the cost of reduced data rate
• The Gilbert-Varshamov bound provides a fundamental limit on the achievable code rate for a given relative minimum distance $\delta$
• Codes approaching the Gilbert-Varshamov bound offer the best trade-off between code rate and error-correcting performance
• In practice, code designers seek to construct codes with rates close to the Gilbert-Varshamov bound while maintaining efficient encoding and decoding algorithms