Environmental justice in coastal communities addresses the unequal distribution of environmental burdens and benefits. It focuses on how marginalized populations often face greater risks from pollution, climate change, and resource scarcity in coastal areas.

Coastal Resilience Engineering integrates these principles to ensure equitable protection and resource distribution. By understanding environmental justice fundamentals, engineers can develop more inclusive and effective strategies for building resilient coastal infrastructure and communities.

Environmental justice fundamentals

  • Environmental justice in coastal communities addresses the disproportionate environmental burdens faced by marginalized populations living in coastal areas
  • Coastal Resilience Engineering integrates environmental justice principles to ensure equitable protection and resource distribution for all coastal residents
  • Understanding environmental justice fundamentals forms the foundation for developing resilient coastal infrastructure and policies

Definition of environmental justice

Top images from around the web for Definition of environmental justice
Top images from around the web for Definition of environmental justice
  • Fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income in environmental decision-making processes
  • Equitable distribution of environmental benefits and burdens across all communities
  • Recognizes the interconnectedness of social, economic, and environmental factors in shaping community well-being
  • Aims to address historical patterns of discrimination and to environmental hazards

Historical context

  • Emerged as a grassroots movement in the 1980s in response to the disproportionate siting of toxic waste facilities in minority communities
  • Warren County, North Carolina protests (1982) catalyzed national attention to
  • Executive Order 12898 (1994) required federal agencies to address environmental justice in minority and low-income populations
  • Grew from civil rights and environmental movements, highlighting the intersection of social justice and environmental protection
  • Evolved to encompass a broader range of issues, including climate change impacts on vulnerable communities

Key principles

  • Distributive justice ensures fair allocation of environmental risks and resources across all communities
  • Procedural justice guarantees meaningful in environmental decision-making processes for all stakeholders
  • Recognition justice acknowledges and respects diverse cultural perspectives and traditional ecological knowledge
  • Corrective justice addresses past environmental harms and prevents future injustices
  • Intergenerational considers the rights of future generations to a healthy environment

Coastal communities and injustice

  • Coastal areas often experience heightened environmental injustices due to their unique geographical and socioeconomic characteristics
  • Coastal Resilience Engineering must address these injustices to create truly resilient communities that can withstand environmental and social challenges
  • Understanding the specific vulnerabilities and disparities in coastal communities is crucial for developing effective and equitable resilience strategies

Vulnerable populations

  • Low-income communities often reside in flood-prone areas with inadequate protection measures
  • Racial and ethnic minorities frequently face higher exposure to coastal hazards and pollution
  • Elderly residents may have limited mobility and resources for evacuation during extreme weather events
  • Children are particularly susceptible to health impacts from environmental contaminants in coastal areas
  • Immigrant communities may face language barriers in accessing emergency information and resources

Socioeconomic disparities

  • Income inequality leads to disparities in housing quality and location, with lower-income residents often living in high-risk coastal zones
  • Educational attainment gaps result in limited access to information about environmental risks and mitigation strategies
  • Occupational segregation exposes certain groups to higher levels of environmental hazards in coastal industries (fishing, tourism)
  • Limited political representation hinders marginalized communities' ability to influence coastal development decisions
  • Lack of financial resources restricts options for relocation or property improvements to enhance resilience

Environmental burdens

  • Industrial facilities concentrated in low-income coastal areas release pollutants into air and water
  • Legacy contamination from historical industrial activities persists in soil and sediments, affecting current residents
  • Wastewater treatment plants often located in disadvantaged neighborhoods, leading to odor and water quality issues
  • Port activities contribute to air pollution and noise, disproportionately affecting nearby communities
  • Coastal erosion and land loss threaten cultural heritage sites and traditional livelihoods of indigenous communities

Climate change impacts

  • Climate change exacerbates existing environmental injustices in coastal communities, creating new challenges for vulnerable populations
  • Coastal Resilience Engineering must anticipate and address the unequal distribution of climate change impacts to ensure equitable adaptation
  • Understanding the interconnected nature of climate change effects on coastal environments and social systems is crucial for developing comprehensive resilience strategies

Sea level rise effects

  • Increased flooding frequency in low-lying coastal areas, disproportionately affecting low-income neighborhoods
  • Saltwater intrusion into freshwater aquifers threatens drinking water supplies for coastal communities
  • Coastal erosion accelerates, leading to loss of property and cultural sites in vulnerable areas
  • Wetland inundation reduces natural buffers against storm surges, increasing flood risks for nearby populations
  • Displacement of residents from high-risk areas may lead to climate gentrification in safer locations

Extreme weather events

  • More intense hurricanes and tropical storms cause greater damage to inadequately protected coastal infrastructure
  • amplification due to sea level rise increases flooding risks in low-lying communities
  • Heat waves exacerbate urban heat island effects, particularly in densely populated coastal cities
  • Drought conditions in some coastal regions lead to water scarcity and increased wildfire risks
  • Compound events (simultaneous storm surge, rainfall, and river flooding) overwhelm existing flood protection systems

Health implications

  • Vector-borne diseases (malaria, dengue) expand their range due to changing temperature and precipitation patterns
  • Harmful algal blooms increase in frequency and intensity, affecting coastal water quality and seafood safety
  • Mental health impacts (anxiety, depression, PTSD) rise due to repeated exposure to extreme weather events and displacement
  • Respiratory issues worsen from increased air pollution and allergens associated with climate change
  • Food insecurity grows as climate change affects fisheries and coastal agriculture productivity

Environmental hazards

  • Coastal communities face a complex array of environmental hazards that often disproportionately impact vulnerable populations
  • Coastal Resilience Engineering must identify and mitigate these hazards while considering their unequal distribution and cumulative effects
  • Understanding the sources and impacts of environmental hazards is essential for developing targeted interventions and protective measures

Pollution sources

  • Industrial discharges release heavy metals and organic pollutants into coastal waters, affecting marine ecosystems and human health
  • Agricultural runoff contributes excess nutrients and pesticides, leading to eutrophication and harmful algal blooms
  • Urban stormwater carries contaminants from roads and buildings, degrading water quality in receiving water bodies
  • Atmospheric deposition of pollutants from distant sources impacts coastal air and water quality
  • Marine debris, including microplastics, accumulates on beaches and in coastal waters, harming wildlife and potentially entering the food chain

Toxic waste sites

  • Superfund sites in coastal areas pose long-term contamination risks, often located near disadvantaged communities
  • Brownfields from former industrial activities limit redevelopment opportunities and expose residents to potential health hazards
  • Illegal dumping sites in underserved coastal neighborhoods create localized pollution hotspots
  • Contaminated sediments in coastal waters and estuaries persist as legacy pollution sources
  • Nuclear waste storage facilities near coastlines raise concerns about long-term safety and potential leakage

Industrial facilities

  • Oil refineries and petrochemical plants emit air pollutants and pose risks of spills or explosions
  • Power plants, particularly coal-fired facilities, contribute to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions
  • Ports and shipping terminals generate air and noise pollution from vessel traffic and cargo handling operations
  • Desalination plants discharge highly concentrated brine, potentially impacting marine ecosystems
  • Aquaculture facilities can lead to water quality degradation and introduce non-native species to coastal ecosystems

Resource access inequities

  • Unequal access to essential resources exacerbates environmental injustices in coastal communities
  • Coastal Resilience Engineering must address resource disparities to ensure all residents have the means to adapt to environmental challenges
  • Understanding the interconnected nature of resource access issues is crucial for developing comprehensive and equitable resilience strategies

Clean water availability

  • Aging water infrastructure in low-income coastal areas leads to frequent service disruptions and contamination risks
  • Saltwater intrusion into freshwater aquifers disproportionately affects communities relying on well water
  • Water treatment facilities may be inadequate or non-existent in informal coastal settlements
  • Privatization of water services can result in unaffordable rates for low-income residents
  • Limited access to clean water during disasters (hurricanes, floods) exacerbates existing inequalities

Green space distribution

  • Coastal parks and public beaches may be less accessible to inland, low-income neighborhoods
  • Urban heat island effects are more severe in areas lacking tree cover and green spaces
  • Gentrification of waterfront areas can lead to the privatization of previously public coastal access points
  • Environmental restoration projects may prioritize affluent neighborhoods, neglecting underserved communities
  • Limited green infrastructure in disadvantaged areas reduces natural flood mitigation and air quality improvement

Food security issues

  • Overfishing and habitat degradation impact traditional fishing communities' livelihoods and food sources
  • Contamination of local seafood sources disproportionately affects subsistence fishers in low-income coastal areas
  • Loss of agricultural land to sea level rise and saltwater intrusion threatens local food production
  • Food deserts in coastal urban areas limit access to fresh, healthy food options
  • Climate change impacts on fisheries and agriculture may increase food prices, affecting low-income residents most severely

Infrastructure disparities

  • Inequitable distribution and quality of infrastructure in coastal communities contribute to environmental injustices
  • Coastal Resilience Engineering must address these disparities to ensure all residents have adequate protection and access to essential services
  • Understanding the interconnected nature of infrastructure systems is crucial for developing comprehensive and equitable resilience strategies

Flood protection systems

  • Levees and seawalls often prioritize protection of high-value properties, leaving low-income areas more vulnerable
  • Inadequate stormwater management systems in underserved neighborhoods lead to frequent localized flooding
  • Nature-based solutions (wetland restoration, living shorelines) may be underutilized in disadvantaged communities
  • Lack of community input in flood protection planning can result in designs that do not meet local needs or preferences
  • Uneven maintenance of existing flood protection infrastructure exacerbates vulnerabilities in certain areas

Transportation networks

  • Limited public transit options in coastal areas can hinder evacuation efforts during emergencies
  • Low-lying roads in flood-prone areas may isolate communities during extreme weather events
  • Bike lanes and pedestrian infrastructure are often lacking in low-income coastal neighborhoods
  • Port-related traffic disproportionately impacts nearby residential areas, contributing to air pollution and safety concerns
  • Bridge and tunnel vulnerabilities to sea level rise and storm surge may cut off access to critical services for some communities

Emergency services

  • Response times for emergency services may be longer in underserved coastal areas due to distance or inadequate infrastructure
  • Evacuation plans may not adequately consider the needs of elderly, disabled, or non-English speaking residents
  • Emergency shelters may be insufficient or poorly equipped in areas with high social
  • Early warning systems might not effectively reach all community members, particularly those with limited technology access
  • Post-disaster recovery resources are often unevenly distributed, favoring more affluent areas

Policy and legislation

  • Environmental justice policies and legislation play a crucial role in addressing disparities in coastal communities
  • Coastal Resilience Engineering must integrate these policies into planning and implementation to ensure equitable outcomes
  • Understanding the legal and regulatory framework is essential for developing effective and compliant resilience strategies

Environmental justice laws

  • Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in federally funded programs, including environmental protection efforts
  • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires consideration of environmental justice in federal agency actions
  • Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act include provisions for addressing disproportionate pollution impacts
  • State-level environmental justice laws (California, New Jersey) mandate consideration of cumulative impacts in permitting decisions
  • Local ordinances in some coastal cities require environmental justice assessments for new development projects

Coastal zone management

  • promotes coordination between federal, state, and local governments in coastal planning
  • State coastal programs must consider the national interest in siting of facilities (energy, transportation) while addressing local concerns
  • Special Area Management Plans allow for more detailed, place-based coastal planning that can incorporate environmental justice principles
  • Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Program provides funding for protecting important coastal areas, including in underserved communities
  • Living shoreline regulations in some states encourage nature-based solutions that can benefit multiple communities

Community engagement requirements

  • Executive Order 12898 mandates federal agencies to involve minority and low-income populations in environmental decision-making
  • Public participation requirements in permitting processes aim to ensure all stakeholders have a voice in coastal development
  • Environmental Impact Statements must consider environmental justice impacts and include public comment periods
  • Some states require multilingual outreach and materials for environmental decision-making processes
  • Community Benefits Agreements in some coastal cities ensure local residents receive tangible benefits from development projects

Risk assessment methods

  • Accurate and comprehensive risk assessment is crucial for identifying and addressing environmental injustices in coastal communities
  • Coastal Resilience Engineering must employ robust assessment methods to ensure equitable distribution of resources and protections
  • Understanding various risk assessment techniques allows for a more nuanced approach to environmental justice issues in coastal areas

Cumulative impact analysis

  • Assesses combined effects of multiple environmental stressors on community health and well-being
  • Considers both chemical and non-chemical stressors (noise, lack of green space) in evaluating overall impact
  • Incorporates historical and current exposures to account for long-term environmental burdens
  • Utilizes data from various sources (air quality monitoring, health surveys, socioeconomic indicators) for comprehensive analysis
  • Helps identify communities facing disproportionate environmental burdens for targeted interventions

Social vulnerability indices

  • Quantify community vulnerability based on socioeconomic, demographic, and housing characteristics
  • CDC's Social Vulnerability Index considers factors such as poverty, lack of vehicle access, and crowded housing
  • NOAA's Social Vulnerability Index for Coastal Communities incorporates additional marine-dependent economy indicators
  • Hazards of Place model combines biophysical vulnerability with social vulnerability for a holistic assessment
  • Allows for comparison of vulnerability across different geographic areas and identification of high-priority communities

GIS mapping techniques

  • Spatial analysis tools visualize the distribution of environmental hazards and social vulnerability
  • Overlay multiple data layers (flood zones, toxic sites, demographics) to identify areas of concentrated disadvantage
  • Kernel density estimation highlights clusters of environmental burdens or vulnerable populations
  • Network analysis assesses accessibility to critical resources and services in coastal communities
  • Participatory GIS incorporates local knowledge and perceptions into spatial analysis of environmental justice issues

Resilience planning strategies

  • Effective resilience planning must incorporate environmental justice principles to ensure equitable outcomes for all coastal residents
  • Coastal Resilience Engineering should prioritize inclusive and community-driven approaches to planning and implementation
  • Understanding diverse strategies for building resilience allows for tailored solutions that address the unique needs of different coastal communities

Inclusive decision-making processes

  • Stakeholder mapping identifies all affected groups, including traditionally marginalized communities
  • Multi-stakeholder platforms facilitate dialogue between community members, government agencies, and technical experts
  • Participatory budgeting allows community members to directly influence allocation of resources for resilience projects
  • Citizen advisory committees provide ongoing input and oversight throughout the planning and implementation process
  • Cultural mediators help bridge communication gaps between planners and diverse community groups

Equitable adaptation measures

  • Managed retreat programs with relocation assistance for vulnerable coastal communities
  • Green infrastructure projects that provide multiple benefits (flood protection, air quality improvement, recreation) to underserved areas
  • Workforce development initiatives to train local residents for jobs in coastal restoration and green industries
  • Affordable housing policies that ensure low-income residents can remain in safer, more resilient coastal areas
  • Multilingual early warning systems and evacuation plans tailored to diverse community needs

Community-based solutions

  • Local knowledge integration incorporates traditional ecological practices into coastal management strategies
  • Community-led monitoring programs empower residents to collect data on environmental conditions and hazards
  • Neighborhood resilience hubs provide centralized resources and services during both emergencies and normal times
  • Social networks and mutual aid systems strengthen community bonds and enhance disaster response capabilities
  • Community land trusts preserve affordable housing and enable collective ownership of coastal properties

Economic considerations

  • Economic factors play a significant role in environmental justice issues and resilience planning for coastal communities
  • Coastal Resilience Engineering must balance economic development with equitable protection and resource distribution
  • Understanding the complex economic dynamics of coastal areas is crucial for developing sustainable and just resilience strategies

Job opportunities vs displacement

  • Green jobs in coastal restoration and renewable energy can provide employment for local residents
  • Workforce training programs prepare community members for emerging industries in resilient coastal development
  • Gentrification from climate adaptation projects may lead to displacement of long-time residents
  • Community benefit agreements ensure local hiring and affordable housing in new coastal developments
  • Transition planning for declining industries (fossil fuels) helps workers adapt to changing coastal economies

Property values and gentrification

  • Climate gentrification drives up property values in areas less vulnerable to sea level rise and flooding
  • Increased insurance costs in high-risk coastal areas disproportionately burden low-income homeowners
  • Buyout programs for flood-prone properties may not offer adequate compensation for relocation
  • Tax incentives for resilience upgrades can inadvertently favor wealthier property owners
  • Community land trusts and limited equity cooperatives preserve affordable housing in appreciating coastal areas

Cost-benefit analysis approaches

  • Traditional cost-benefit analyses often undervalue non-market goods and services important to vulnerable communities
  • Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology incorporates broader social and environmental impacts
  • Environmental justice screening tools help identify and prioritize investments in underserved coastal areas
  • Ecosystem services valuation captures the full range of benefits provided by coastal natural resources
  • Participatory cost-benefit analysis involves community members in defining and weighing costs and benefits

Case studies

  • Examining real-world examples of environmental justice challenges and interventions in coastal communities provides valuable insights
  • Coastal Resilience Engineering can learn from both successes and failures to improve future planning and implementation
  • Understanding diverse case studies helps identify transferable strategies and context-specific considerations for addressing environmental justice issues

Successful interventions

  • Restoration of urban waterways in Baltimore's Inner Harbor improved water quality and created community green spaces
  • New York City's Cool Neighborhoods program targeted heat-vulnerable communities with tree planting and cool roof installations
  • Louisiana's Strategic Adaptations for Future Environments (LA SAFE) program engaged communities in equitable adaptation planning
  • Port of Los Angeles Clean Truck Program reduced air pollution in nearby low-income neighborhoods
  • Bristol Bay, Alaska's successful opposition to Pebble Mine project protected indigenous fishing communities and ecosystems

Ongoing challenges

  • Uneven recovery from Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans highlights persistent socioeconomic disparities in disaster resilience
  • Sea level rise threatens cultural heritage and livelihoods of indigenous communities in coastal Louisiana
  • Environmental justice concerns in Houston's petrochemical corridor (Cancer Alley) remain unresolved despite decades of activism
  • Gentrification pressures in Miami's Little Haiti neighborhood due to climate migration from flood-prone areas
  • Ongoing water contamination issues in coastal North Carolina from industrial hog farms disproportionately affect low-income communities

Lessons learned

  • Early and meaningful community engagement is crucial for successful and equitable resilience planning
  • Intersectional approach to vulnerability assessment captures complex realities of coastal environmental justice issues
  • Flexible and adaptive management strategies allow for course corrections as new information and challenges emerge
  • Importance of addressing underlying socioeconomic disparities alongside physical infrastructure improvements
  • Need for long-term monitoring and evaluation to assess true impacts of environmental justice interventions over time

Future directions

  • Anticipating future challenges and opportunities is essential for proactive environmental justice efforts in coastal communities
  • Coastal Resilience Engineering must stay at the forefront of technological and policy innovations to address evolving environmental justice issues
  • Understanding emerging trends and research priorities helps guide the development of more effective and equitable resilience strategies

Emerging technologies

  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning improve predictive modeling of climate impacts on vulnerable coastal communities
  • Remote sensing and drone technology enhance monitoring of environmental hazards and ecosystem health in coastal areas
  • Blockchain applications increase transparency and traceability in supply chains, benefiting coastal fishing communities
  • Advanced water treatment technologies (graphene filters, nanotechnology) improve access to clean water in underserved areas
  • Virtual and augmented reality tools facilitate community engagement in coastal planning and visualization of future scenarios

Policy recommendations

  • Integrate environmental justice metrics into all coastal management and development decisions
  • Establish dedicated funding streams for community-led resilience projects in vulnerable coastal areas
  • Implement just transition policies to support workers and communities affected by shifts away from fossil fuel industries
  • Strengthen cumulative impact assessment requirements in environmental permitting processes
  • Develop adaptive governance frameworks that allow for flexible responses to changing coastal conditions

Research priorities

  • Improve understanding of compounding and cascading climate impacts on vulnerable coastal populations
  • Develop more nuanced social vulnerability indices that capture intersectionality and community assets
  • Investigate the long-term health effects of chronic exposure to multiple environmental stressors in coastal areas
  • Assess the effectiveness of nature-based solutions in providing equitable benefits to diverse coastal communities
  • Explore innovative financing mechanisms for equitable coastal adaptation and resilience projects

Key Terms to Review (18)

Adaptive Capacity: Adaptive capacity refers to the ability of a system, community, or ecosystem to adjust to changes and disturbances, enabling them to cope with challenges such as climate change, sea level rise, and other environmental stresses. This concept encompasses various factors including resilience, flexibility, and resource availability, which together determine how effectively entities can respond to and recover from adverse impacts.
Coastal Zone Management Act: The Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) is a U.S. federal law enacted in 1972 aimed at protecting and managing the nation's coastal resources and environments. It provides a framework for states to develop coastal management programs that balance economic development with environmental conservation, ensuring sustainable use of coastal areas while addressing issues like erosion, flooding, and habitat preservation.
Community resilience building: Community resilience building refers to the process of enhancing the capacity of a community to respond to, recover from, and adapt to various challenges, particularly environmental and social stresses. This involves fostering strong relationships, improving resource management, and empowering individuals to collectively address risks and uncertainties, ensuring that all community members have equitable access to resources and opportunities for recovery. The concept emphasizes inclusivity and collaboration, particularly in vulnerable communities that face disproportionate impacts from environmental hazards.
Community-led planning: Community-led planning is a collaborative approach that empowers local residents to actively participate in the decision-making processes regarding the development and management of their neighborhoods and resources. This method emphasizes the importance of local knowledge, values, and needs, ensuring that planning initiatives reflect the priorities of the community rather than top-down directives. By engaging community members, this approach aims to foster a sense of ownership and responsibility, ultimately leading to more sustainable and equitable outcomes.
Disproportionate exposure: Disproportionate exposure refers to the uneven burden faced by certain communities, particularly marginalized or low-income groups, in experiencing environmental hazards or risks. This concept highlights how factors such as socioeconomic status, race, and geographic location can result in specific populations being more affected by environmental issues, particularly in coastal regions where vulnerability to climate change and natural disasters is heightened.
Dorothy Roberts: Dorothy Roberts is a prominent scholar and advocate known for her work in the fields of law, social policy, and reproductive justice. Her research critically examines the intersections of race, gender, and class in environmental justice, particularly in marginalized coastal communities where environmental degradation disproportionately affects vulnerable populations. Roberts emphasizes the importance of recognizing how systemic inequalities shape access to resources and the ability to respond to environmental challenges.
Environmental Justice Act: The Environmental Justice Act is a legislative measure aimed at addressing the disproportionate environmental burdens faced by marginalized communities. This act emphasizes the need for equitable distribution of environmental benefits and harms, ensuring that all communities, regardless of their socioeconomic status, have a voice in environmental decision-making processes.
Environmental justice screening method: The environmental justice screening method is a systematic approach used to identify and analyze the potential impacts of environmental policies, projects, or decisions on vulnerable and marginalized communities. This method focuses on assessing the distribution of environmental benefits and burdens across different populations, aiming to ensure that no group is disproportionately affected by harmful environmental practices. By applying this method, stakeholders can address inequities and promote fair treatment for all communities in relation to environmental hazards.
Environmental Racism: Environmental racism refers to the disproportionate impact of environmental hazards on people of color and low-income communities, often resulting from systemic discrimination and inequitable policies. This term highlights how marginalized groups are more likely to be located near polluting industries, hazardous waste sites, and other environmental dangers, leading to significant health and socio-economic disparities.
Equity: Equity refers to the concept of fairness and justice in the distribution of resources, opportunities, and benefits among individuals and communities. It emphasizes the need to consider the unique circumstances and challenges faced by different groups, ensuring that everyone has access to the same opportunities for success, especially in the context of social and environmental issues.
Justice40 Initiative: The Justice40 Initiative is a federal policy aimed at ensuring that 40% of the overall benefits of certain federal investments in climate and clean energy are directed towards disadvantaged communities. This initiative seeks to address historical inequities by prioritizing investments that will help improve environmental quality, public health, and economic opportunity in communities that have been disproportionately affected by pollution and climate change.
No toxic dumps: No toxic dumps refers to the principle that communities, especially marginalized ones, should not bear the burden of hazardous waste disposal and pollution, ensuring that all neighborhoods are safe from harmful contaminants. This concept ties closely to environmental justice, advocating for equitable treatment and protection of all communities regardless of socio-economic status, race, or geography. By eliminating toxic dumps, communities can promote healthier environments and reduce disparities in health outcomes related to pollution exposure.
Participation: Participation refers to the active involvement of individuals and communities in decision-making processes that affect their lives, particularly in relation to environmental and social issues. This concept emphasizes the importance of including diverse voices and perspectives, ensuring that all stakeholders, especially marginalized groups, have a say in policies and actions impacting their environment and communities. Participation is crucial for fostering a sense of ownership and responsibility among community members.
Robert Bullard: Robert Bullard is an American civil rights advocate and scholar known as the 'father of environmental justice.' He has been instrumental in highlighting how environmental policies and practices disproportionately affect marginalized communities, particularly in the context of pollution and land use in urban areas. His work emphasizes the need for equitable treatment and meaningful involvement of all people in environmental decision-making processes, making his contributions vital to understanding environmental justice issues in coastal communities.
Sea-level rise: Sea-level rise refers to the increase in the average level of the world's oceans due to the effects of climate change, including thermal expansion of seawater and melting ice sheets and glaciers. This phenomenon poses significant risks to coastal communities, as it can lead to the loss of land, increased flooding, and disruption of local economies that depend on stable coastlines. The implications of sea-level rise are profound, affecting environmental justice, as marginalized populations often bear the brunt of these changes, and necessitating cooperative management strategies across political borders to mitigate its impacts.
Stakeholder involvement: Stakeholder involvement refers to the engagement and participation of individuals or groups who have an interest in or are affected by a project, decision, or policy. This engagement is crucial for gathering diverse perspectives, ensuring that decisions are informed and equitable, and fostering collaboration to achieve sustainable outcomes in coastal management and resilience efforts.
Storm surge: Storm surge is an abnormal rise in sea level that occurs during a storm, primarily due to strong winds and low atmospheric pressure. This phenomenon can lead to significant coastal flooding and erosion, impacting coastal ecosystems and human infrastructure.
Vulnerability: Vulnerability refers to the susceptibility of a community, system, or individual to harm from environmental hazards and stresses. It involves an assessment of factors like exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity that determine how likely it is that adverse impacts will occur. Understanding vulnerability is crucial for effective risk assessment and ensuring that responses to environmental challenges are equitable and just.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.