🪜Civil Procedure Unit 9 – Judgments and Post–Trial Motions
Judgments and post-trial motions are crucial aspects of civil procedure that determine case outcomes and shape future legal strategies. This unit covers the types of judgments, the process of entering judgments, and the various post-trial motions available to parties seeking to challenge or modify court decisions.
Understanding these concepts is essential for navigating the final stages of litigation. From default judgments to injunctive relief, and from motions for new trials to appeals, this unit provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms that bring lawsuits to a close and allow parties to seek reconsideration or review of court decisions.
Judgment refers to the final decision made by a court in a lawsuit that resolves the dispute between the parties
Post-trial motions are requests made to the court after a judgment has been entered to alter, amend, or set aside the judgment
Jurisdiction is the court's authority to hear and decide a case, which can impact the validity of a judgment
Res judicata is a legal doctrine that prevents the same parties from relitigating a claim that has already been decided by a court
Includes both claim preclusion (bars relitigation of the same claim) and issue preclusion (bars relitigation of issues already decided)
Collateral attack is an attempt to challenge a judgment in a separate proceeding, often based on lack of jurisdiction or due process violations
Execution is the process of enforcing a judgment, such as seizing assets or garnishing wages, to satisfy the judgment debt
Supersedeas bond is a bond posted by the losing party to stay enforcement of the judgment pending appeal
Types of Judgments
Default judgment is entered against a party who fails to respond to a lawsuit or appear in court
Summary judgment is granted when there are no genuine disputes of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
Consent judgment is entered by agreement of the parties and has the same effect as a judgment entered after a trial
Declaratory judgment is a binding adjudication of the rights and status of the parties, even if no consequential relief is awarded
Often used to determine rights under a contract or the constitutionality of a law
Money judgment orders the payment of a sum of money by one party to another
Injunctive relief is a judgment ordering a party to do or refrain from doing a specific act, such as an order to stop infringing a patent
Entry of Judgment Process
After a verdict or decision, the prevailing party prepares a proposed judgment and submits it to the court
The losing party has an opportunity to object to the form of the proposed judgment
Once the court approves the form of the judgment, it is entered by the clerk of the court
Date of entry is important for calculating deadlines for post-trial motions and appeals
Notice of entry of judgment must be served on all parties
Judgment becomes final and enforceable if no post-trial motions or appeals are filed within the applicable time limits
Certified copy of the judgment can be recorded to create a lien on real property owned by the judgment debtor
Judgment can be enforced through various means, such as execution, garnishment, or judgment debtor exam
Post-Trial Motions Overview
Purpose of post-trial motions is to allow the trial court to correct errors or reconsider its decision before an appeal is filed
Common post-trial motions include motion for new trial, motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), and motion to alter or amend the judgment
Must be filed within strict time limits after entry of judgment (typically 28 days in federal court)
Filing a post-trial motion suspends the finality of the judgment and tolls the time to file an appeal
Court has discretion to grant or deny most post-trial motions
Standard of review varies depending on the type of motion
If post-trial motions are denied, the judgment becomes final and the time to appeal begins to run
Specific Post-Trial Motions
Motion for new trial argues that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, there were errors of law, or misconduct occurred affecting the fairness of the trial
Granted if the verdict is clearly erroneous or a miscarriage of justice would result if the verdict is allowed to stand
Motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) or judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) argues that no reasonable jury could have reached the verdict based on the evidence presented
Granted only if there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for the non-moving party
Motion to alter or amend the judgment under Rule 59(e) is used to correct clear errors of law or fact, prevent manifest injustice, or account for newly discovered evidence
Motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60 is used in cases of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, fraud, or other exceptional circumstances
Rule 60(b) lists specific grounds for relief and has longer time limits than other post-trial motions
Time Limits and Deadlines
Post-trial motions must be filed within 28 days after entry of judgment in federal court (Rule 59)
Some states have different time limits
If no post-trial motions are filed, notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of judgment in federal court (Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure)
If a post-trial motion is timely filed, the time to appeal runs from the entry of the order disposing of the last such motion
Motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) must be filed within a reasonable time, and for certain grounds, no more than one year after entry of judgment
Strict compliance with time limits is essential to preserve the right to appeal
Extensions of time are rarely granted and only for compelling reasons
Appeals Process Basics
Party who loses at trial may appeal the judgment to a higher court
Notice of appeal must be filed within the applicable time limit after entry of judgment or denial of post-trial motions
Appellate court reviews the trial court record for errors of law or abuse of discretion
Factual findings are reviewed for clear error and legal conclusions are reviewed de novo
Appellant must identify specific errors and argue how they affected the outcome of the case
Appellee responds to the appellant's arguments and may raise additional issues on cross-appeal
Appellate court may affirm, reverse, or modify the judgment, or remand for further proceedings
Losing party may seek further review by the state or U.S. Supreme Court through a petition for writ of certiorari
Practical Considerations and Strategy
Carefully consider whether to file post-trial motions, as they may delay the appeal and increase costs
May be necessary to preserve certain issues for appeal or to correct clear errors
Ensure that all post-trial motions and appeals are timely filed and comply with applicable rules and procedures
Evaluate the likelihood of success on appeal and the potential impact on the client's interests
Consider settlement opportunities during the post-trial and appellate process
If the judgment is affirmed on appeal, promptly pursue enforcement and collection efforts
Consider domesticating the judgment in other jurisdictions where the judgment debtor has assets
If the judgment is reversed or remanded, assess the impact on the case strategy and prepare for further proceedings
Communicate regularly with the client about the post-trial and appellate process, costs, and potential outcomes