Factorial designs are a powerful tool in causal inference studies. They allow researchers to investigate the effects of multiple simultaneously, uncovering main effects and interactions. This approach is more efficient than single-factor experiments, saving time and resources while providing a comprehensive understanding of causal relationships.
These designs offer several benefits, including the ability to detect interaction effects and increased efficiency. However, they also have limitations, such as the potential for a large number of and difficulty interpreting higher-order interactions. Understanding these pros and cons helps researchers choose the most appropriate design for their specific causal inference study.
Factorial design overview
Factorial designs are experimental designs that investigate the effects of two or more independent variables (factors) on a dependent variable
Allow researchers to study the main effects of each factor and the interaction effects between factors
Factorial designs are commonly used in causal inference studies to determine the cause-and-effect relationships between variables
Factors and levels
Top images from around the web for Factors and levels
General Full Factorial Designs - ReliaWiki View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter 10 Experimental Research – Research Methods for the Social Sciences View original
Is this image relevant?
Lab 13 Continuing the GLM: Two-factor designs | Level 2 Research Methods and Statistics ... View original
Is this image relevant?
General Full Factorial Designs - ReliaWiki View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter 10 Experimental Research – Research Methods for the Social Sciences View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Factors and levels
General Full Factorial Designs - ReliaWiki View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter 10 Experimental Research – Research Methods for the Social Sciences View original
Is this image relevant?
Lab 13 Continuing the GLM: Two-factor designs | Level 2 Research Methods and Statistics ... View original
Is this image relevant?
General Full Factorial Designs - ReliaWiki View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter 10 Experimental Research – Research Methods for the Social Sciences View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Factors are the independent variables manipulated in a factorial design
Each factor has two or more , which are the specific values or categories of the factor
Example: In a studying the effects of diet (low-fat vs high-fat) and exercise (sedentary vs active) on weight loss, diet and exercise are the factors, each with two levels
Treatment combinations
Treatment combinations are the unique combinations of factor levels in a factorial design
The number of treatment combinations is determined by multiplying the number of levels for each factor
Example: In a 2x2 factorial design, there are 4 treatment combinations (low-fat/sedentary, low-fat/active, high-fat/sedentary, high-fat/active)
Balanced vs unbalanced designs
Balanced factorial designs have an equal number of subjects in each treatment combination
have unequal numbers of subjects across treatment combinations
are generally preferred as they provide equal precision for estimating main effects and interactions
Unbalanced designs can occur due to practical constraints or subject attrition, and require more complex statistical analyses
Benefits of factorial designs
Factorial designs offer several advantages over single-factor experiments in causal inference studies
Enable researchers to investigate the effects of multiple factors simultaneously, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the causal relationships
Allow for the detection of interaction effects between factors, which can reveal important insights into the nature of the causal mechanisms
Efficiency vs single-factor experiments
Factorial designs are more efficient than conducting separate single-factor experiments for each factor
Require fewer subjects and resources to investigate the effects of multiple factors
Example: A 2x2 factorial design with 20 subjects per treatment combination (80 total subjects) provides the same information as two separate single-factor experiments, each with 40 subjects (80 total subjects)
Interaction effects detection
Factorial designs allow researchers to detect and estimate interaction effects between factors
Interaction effects occur when the effect of one factor depends on the level of another factor
Detecting interaction effects is crucial for understanding complex causal relationships and avoiding misleading conclusions based on main effects alone
Example: In a study on the effects of medication and therapy on depression, an may show that the medication is more effective when combined with therapy
Cost and time savings
By investigating multiple factors simultaneously, factorial designs can save time and resources compared to conducting separate single-factor experiments
Fewer subjects, materials, and experimental sessions are required, reducing overall costs
Time savings are particularly important in causal inference studies, where timely results can inform policy decisions and interventions
Assumptions of factorial designs
Like other experimental designs, factorial designs rely on certain assumptions to ensure the validity of the results
Violations of these assumptions can lead to biased estimates and incorrect conclusions about the causal relationships
Researchers must assess and address any violations of assumptions to maintain the integrity of the causal inference
Independence of observations
Observations within each treatment combination should be independent of each other
Subjects should not influence each other's responses or outcomes
Violation of independence can occur due to clustering, social interactions, or other forms of dependence
Example: In a study on the effects of classroom interventions on student performance, students within the same classroom may influence each other, violating the independence assumption
Normality of residuals
The residuals (differences between observed and predicted values) should follow a normal distribution
Non-normal residuals can affect the accuracy of significance tests and confidence intervals
Researchers can assess normality using graphical methods (e.g., Q-Q plots) or statistical tests (e.g., Shapiro-Wilk test)
Example: Skewed or heavy-tailed residual distributions may indicate the need for data transformations or alternative statistical methods
Homogeneity of variances
The variances of the residuals should be equal across all treatment combinations
Unequal variances (heteroscedasticity) can affect the accuracy of significance tests and confidence intervals
Researchers can assess using graphical methods (e.g., residual plots) or statistical tests (e.g., Levene's test)
Example: If the variability of outcomes differs substantially between treatment combinations, it may be necessary to use alternative statistical methods that account for heteroscedasticity
Designing factorial experiments
Careful design of factorial experiments is essential for obtaining valid and meaningful results in causal inference studies
Researchers must consider factors such as the selection of factors and levels, sample size determination, and and
Well-designed experiments minimize confounding, maximize statistical power, and ensure the generalizability of the findings
Choosing factors and levels
Select factors that are relevant to the research question and have a plausible causal relationship with the dependent variable
Choose levels that are distinct, meaningful, and representative of the range of values or categories of interest
Consider the practical feasibility and ethical implications of manipulating the factors at the chosen levels
Example: In a study on the effects of temperature and humidity on plant growth, researchers may select levels that represent common environmental conditions and are within the tolerance range of the plant species
Determining sample size
Determine the sample size needed to detect meaningful effects with adequate statistical power
Consider the expected effect sizes, desired level of significance, and available resources
Use tools or consult with a statistician to determine the appropriate sample size
Example: A researcher planning a 2x2 factorial design may use a power analysis to determine that 100 subjects per treatment combination are needed to detect a medium-sized interaction effect with 80% power at a 5% significance level
Randomization and blocking
Randomly assign subjects to treatment combinations to minimize confounding and ensure unbiased estimates of causal effects
Use blocking techniques to control for known sources of variability and improve the precision of the estimates
Blocking involves grouping subjects based on a relevant characteristic and randomly assigning treatments within each block
Example: In a study on the effects of different teaching methods and student backgrounds on learning outcomes, researchers may block students by prior academic performance and randomly assign teaching methods within each block
Analyzing factorial designs
Factorial designs require specialized statistical methods to analyze the main effects and interaction effects of the factors on the dependent variable
Analysis of variance () is the primary tool for analyzing factorial designs, allowing researchers to test the significance of the effects and estimate their magnitudes
Post-hoc tests and measures provide additional insights into the nature and practical importance of the effects
ANOVA for factorial designs
ANOVA partitions the total variability in the dependent variable into components attributable to the main effects of each factor, the interaction effects between factors, and the residual error
Researchers use F-tests to assess the statistical significance of the main effects and interactions
The ANOVA table provides a summary of the sources of variation, degrees of freedom, sums of squares, mean squares, F-values, and p-values
Example: In a 2x2 factorial design, the ANOVA table would include main effects for factors A and B, the interaction effect AxB, and the residual error
Main effects vs interaction effects
Main effects represent the average effect of a factor on the dependent variable, collapsed across the levels of the other factors
Interaction effects represent the extent to which the effect of one factor depends on the level of another factor
Significant main effects indicate that a factor has a consistent effect on the dependent variable, while significant interaction effects suggest that the effect of a factor varies depending on the levels of other factors
Example: In a study on the effects of diet and exercise on weight loss, a significant of diet would indicate that one diet leads to more weight loss on average, while a significant interaction effect would suggest that the effect of diet depends on the level of exercise
Multiple comparisons and post-hoc tests
When a main effect or interaction effect is significant, researchers may conduct post-hoc tests to compare specific treatment combinations or levels of a factor
Multiple comparison procedures (e.g., Tukey's HSD, Bonferroni correction) adjust for the increased risk of Type I errors when making multiple pairwise comparisons
Post-hoc tests provide more detailed information about the nature of the effects and help identify which treatment combinations differ significantly from each other
Example: If a significant interaction effect is found between diet and exercise, post-hoc tests could reveal that the low-fat diet is more effective than the high-fat diet only for sedentary individuals, but not for active individuals
Effect size and power
Effect size measures quantify the magnitude of the main effects and interaction effects, providing an indication of their practical significance
Common effect size measures for factorial designs include partial eta-squared (ηp2) and Cohen's f
Statistical power is the probability of detecting a true effect of a given size, and depends on the sample size, significance level, and effect size
Researchers should report effect sizes and power alongside the statistical significance of the effects to facilitate the interpretation and of the findings
Example: A study with a large sample size may detect a statistically significant main effect, but if the effect size is small, it may have limited practical implications for the causal relationship under investigation
Interpreting factorial results
Interpreting the results of a factorial design involves assessing the statistical significance and practical importance of the main effects and interaction effects
Researchers should consider the magnitude, direction, and consistency of the effects, as well as their theoretical and practical implications for the causal relationships under study
Graphical representations can aid in the interpretation and communication of the results
Significance of main effects
A significant main effect indicates that a factor has a consistent effect on the dependent variable, averaged across the levels of the other factors
The direction of the main effect (positive or negative) indicates whether increasing levels of the factor are associated with higher or lower values of the dependent variable
The magnitude of the main effect, as indicated by the effect size, provides information about the strength of the relationship between the factor and the dependent variable
Example: In a study on the effects of light intensity and fertilizer on plant growth, a significant main effect of light intensity would suggest that plants grow differently under different light levels, regardless of the fertilizer used
Significance of interaction effects
A significant interaction effect indicates that the effect of one factor on the dependent variable depends on the level of another factor
The nature of the interaction can be further explored by examining the pattern of means across the treatment combinations or by conducting post-hoc tests
Significant interactions can provide insights into the complexity of the causal relationships and help identify the conditions under which the effects of the factors are most pronounced
Example: In a study on the effects of study method and subject difficulty on test scores, a significant interaction effect may show that the effectiveness of a particular study method depends on the difficulty of the subject matter
Graphical representations of effects
Graphical displays, such as interaction plots or bar graphs, can help visualize the main effects and interaction effects
Interaction plots display the means of the dependent variable for each treatment combination, with lines connecting the means for each level of one factor across the levels of the other factor
Parallel lines in an interaction plot indicate the absence of an interaction effect, while non-parallel lines suggest the presence of an interaction
Bar graphs can be used to display the means and confidence intervals for each treatment combination, facilitating comparisons between the combinations
Example: An interaction plot showing non-parallel lines for the effects of study method and subject difficulty on test scores would provide a clear visual representation of the interaction effect
Factorial design variations
Factorial designs can be extended and modified to accommodate different research questions and experimental constraints
Variations of factorial designs include two-way vs three-way designs, within-subjects vs between-subjects factors, and mixed factorial designs
Understanding these variations allows researchers to select the most appropriate design for their specific causal inference study
Two-way vs three-way designs
Two-way factorial designs involve two factors, each with two or more levels, while three-way designs include three factors
Three-way designs allow for the investigation of higher-order interactions between the factors, but also require larger sample sizes and more complex interpretations
The choice between a two-way and three-way design depends on the research question, the number of factors of interest, and the available resources
Example: A researcher studying the effects of age, gender, and education level on job satisfaction may opt for a three-way factorial design to examine all possible interactions between the factors
Within-subjects vs between-subjects factors
Within-subjects (repeated measures) factors involve each subject being exposed to all levels of the factor, while between-subjects factors involve each subject being exposed to only one level of the factor
Within-subjects designs are generally more powerful than between-subjects designs, as they control for individual differences between subjects
However, within-subjects designs may be subject to carryover effects and require counterbalancing to minimize order effects
Example: In a study on the effects of different types of feedback on task performance, a within-subjects factor could involve each participant receiving both positive and negative feedback, while a between-subjects factor would assign each participant to receive either positive or negative feedback
Mixed factorial designs
Mixed factorial designs involve a combination of within-subjects and between-subjects factors
These designs allow researchers to investigate the effects of both types of factors and their interactions within the same study
Mixed designs can provide a balance between the increased power of within-subjects designs and the reduced risk of carryover effects in between-subjects designs
Example: A study on the effects of caffeine and time of day on cognitive performance may use a mixed design, with caffeine as a between-subjects factor (caffeine vs placebo) and time of day as a within-subjects factor (morning vs afternoon)
Limitations of factorial designs
Despite their many advantages, factorial designs also have some limitations that researchers should be aware of when planning and conducting causal inference studies
These limitations include the potential for a large number of treatment combinations, difficulty interpreting higher-order interactions, and the risk of confounding and lurking variables
Researchers should carefully consider these limitations and take steps to minimize their impact on the validity and generalizability of the findings
Large number of treatment combinations
As the number of factors and levels increases, the number of treatment combinations in a factorial design can grow rapidly
Large numbers of treatment combinations require larger sample sizes and more resources to implement, which may not be feasible in some research contexts
Researchers may need to prioritize the most important factors and levels, or consider alternative designs (e.g., fractional factorial designs) that reduce the number of treatment combinations
Example: A 2x2x2x2 factorial design would have 16 treatment combinations, which may be impractical to implement with a limited sample size or budget
Difficulty interpreting higher-order interactions
Higher-order interactions (e.g., three-way or four-way interactions) can be difficult to interpret and communicate, especially when the pattern of means is complex
The presence of significant higher-order interactions may suggest that the causal relationships are more complex than initially hypothesized, requiring further investigation and theoretical development
Researchers should exercise caution when interpreting higher-order interactions and consider the possibility of spurious findings due to
Example: A significant three-way interaction between age, gender, and education level on job satisfaction may be challenging to interpret and may require additional analyses or follow-up studies to understand the nature of the relationship
Confounding and lurking variables
Factorial designs, like other experimental designs, are susceptible to confounding and lurking variables that can bias the estimates of the causal effects
Confounding occurs when a third variable is related to both the independent and dependent variables, leading to a spurious association
Lurking variables are unmeasured variables that may influence the dependent variable and interact with the independent variables, distorting the true causal relationships
Researchers should strive to identify and control for potential confounding and lurking variables through careful study design, randomization, and statistical adjustment
Example: In a study on the effects of a new teaching method on student performance, socioeconomic status may be a confounding variable if it is related to both the likelihood of a school adopting the new method and the students' academic outcomes
Factorial designs in practice
Factorial designs have been widely used in various fields, including psychology, education, marketing, and healthcare, to investigate causal relationships and inform policy and practice
Real-world examples and case studies demonstrate the application of factorial designs to address important research questions and provide actionable insights
Researchers should follow best practices for reporting factorial design results and consider extensions and alternatives to factorial designs when appropriate
Real-world examples and case studies
A classic example of a factorial design is the study by Bandura, Ross, and Ross (1961) on the effects of observing aggression on children's aggressive behavior, which used a 2x2 design with the factors of model aggression (aggressive vs non-aggressive) and model reward (rewarded vs punished)
In a marketing context, a factorial design could be used to investigate the effects of price, packaging, and advertising on consumer purchasing behavior, with each factor having multiple levels
In healthcare, factorial designs have been used to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment combinations, such as the interaction between medication and psychotherapy on mental health outcomes
Case studies can provide valuable insights into the practical challenges and solutions involved in implementing factorial designs in real-world settings
Reporting factorial design results
When reporting the results of a factorial design, researchers should follow established guidelines, such as the APA Style or the CONSORT statement for randomized controlled trials
The report should include a clear description of the factors, levels, and treatment combinations, as well as the sample size and characteristics
The statistical analyses should be described in detail, including the ANOVA results, effect sizes, and post-hoc tests, along with the appropriate measures of uncertainty (e.g., confidence intervals, p-values)
Graphical representations, such as interaction plots or bar graphs, should be use
Key Terms to Review (28)
2x2 factorial design: A 2x2 factorial design is an experimental setup that examines the effects of two independent variables, each with two levels, on a dependent variable. This type of design allows researchers to explore not only the main effects of each independent variable but also the interaction effects between them, providing a comprehensive understanding of how different factors influence outcomes.
3x2 factorial design: A 3x2 factorial design is an experimental setup that involves two independent variables, where one variable has three levels and the other has two levels. This type of design allows researchers to study the individual and interactive effects of these variables on a dependent variable, providing a comprehensive view of how different conditions influence outcomes. By including multiple levels for each factor, it enhances the ability to detect differences and interactions that may not be evident in simpler designs.
ANOVA: ANOVA, or Analysis of Variance, is a statistical method used to compare means across multiple groups to determine if at least one group mean is different from the others. It helps in assessing the impact of one or more independent variables on a dependent variable, making it particularly useful in the context of stratified and blocked designs, as well as factorial designs, where researchers aim to understand interactions between variables and the variation among group means.
Balanced Designs: Balanced designs refer to experimental setups where all treatment combinations are represented equally across the subjects or experimental units. This equality helps ensure that the effects of different treatments can be accurately compared without bias, making it a critical feature in factorial designs. Balanced designs contribute to the integrity of statistical analyses, allowing researchers to isolate and understand the main effects and interactions between variables effectively.
Blocking Techniques: Blocking techniques are methods used in experimental design to control for the variability among subjects by grouping similar subjects together. This approach helps reduce the impact of confounding variables and improves the accuracy of the experiment by ensuring that comparisons are made between like groups, particularly in factorial designs where multiple factors are analyzed simultaneously.
Choosing Factors and Levels: Choosing factors and levels refers to the process of selecting the independent variables (factors) in an experiment and determining the specific conditions (levels) under which these factors will be tested. This is crucial in experimental design, especially in factorial designs, as it directly influences the validity and reliability of the findings by allowing researchers to examine the interactions between different factors at various levels.
Clinical Trials: Clinical trials are systematic research studies conducted to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of medical interventions, such as drugs, treatments, or devices. These trials are crucial in generating reliable data that help guide healthcare decisions and establish new standards of care. They often employ rigorous methodologies to minimize biases and ensure that the findings are valid and applicable to the broader population, which connects them to various study designs and methods for controlling confounding variables.
Determining sample size: Determining sample size refers to the process of calculating the number of participants needed in a study to ensure that the results are statistically valid and reliable. This concept is crucial in factorial designs as it helps researchers balance the need for sufficient power to detect effects while also managing practical considerations such as resource availability and time constraints.
Effect Size: Effect size is a quantitative measure that describes the magnitude of a phenomenon or the strength of the relationship between variables. It provides a standardized way to understand how impactful a particular intervention or treatment is, making it essential for interpreting results in statistical analyses. By quantifying the difference between groups or the degree of association, effect size allows researchers to make more informed conclusions and comparisons across studies.
Factorial Notation: Factorial notation, denoted by the symbol '!', represents the product of all positive integers from 1 up to a specified integer n. It is commonly used in mathematics and statistics, particularly in permutations, combinations, and factorial designs, allowing for efficient calculation of the number of ways to arrange or combine items.
Factors: Factors are the variables or conditions in an experiment that can be manipulated to observe their effects on a particular outcome. In the context of experimental design, particularly factorial designs, factors are used to explore the interactions between multiple independent variables and their impact on dependent variables, allowing researchers to understand complex relationships and optimize results.
Homogeneity of variances: Homogeneity of variances refers to the assumption that different groups in a statistical analysis have the same variance, meaning the spread or dispersion of data points around the mean is consistent across these groups. This concept is critical when conducting various statistical tests, as violating this assumption can lead to incorrect conclusions about the relationships between variables. In experimental designs, particularly factorial designs, ensuring that variances are equal across treatment groups helps maintain the validity of results.
Independence of Observations: Independence of observations means that the data collected from different subjects or experimental units should not influence each other. In research, this is crucial because when observations are dependent, it can lead to biased results and incorrect conclusions. Ensuring independence helps in accurately estimating effects and interactions within designs, particularly in factorial experiments where multiple factors are considered simultaneously.
Interaction Effect: An interaction effect occurs when the impact of one independent variable on a dependent variable differs depending on the level of another independent variable. This concept is crucial in understanding how variables can work together, often revealing more complex relationships within data than what simple additive effects can show. Recognizing interaction effects allows researchers to make better predictions and understand the nuances of their findings in different contexts.
K-factorial design: A k-factorial design is a type of experimental design that involves manipulating multiple factors, where 'k' represents the number of factors being tested. This design allows researchers to examine the effects of different combinations of factors on a response variable. By utilizing k-factorial designs, researchers can assess both main effects and interactions among factors, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of how these variables influence outcomes.
Levels: In research, 'levels' refers to the different values or conditions of a factor in an experiment. Each level represents a specific setting or treatment applied to participants, allowing researchers to investigate how variations in the independent variable affect the dependent variable. Understanding levels is crucial for structuring factorial designs, as they help illustrate the complexity and interactions between multiple factors in a study.
Main effect: The main effect refers to the direct influence of an independent variable on a dependent variable in an experimental design, without considering the interaction with other variables. It is essential for understanding how each factor contributes to the observed outcomes in a study, particularly in factorial designs where multiple factors are tested simultaneously. By isolating the main effects, researchers can identify the overall impact of each variable on the results.
Marginal Means: Marginal means refer to the average values of a dependent variable across different levels of an independent variable in a statistical model. This concept is crucial in understanding factorial designs, as it helps to summarize the effects of one or more factors while controlling for other variables, providing insight into the overall trends within the data.
Multiple comparisons: Multiple comparisons refer to the statistical practice of comparing multiple groups or treatments simultaneously to identify differences between them. This process is essential in experiments, particularly in factorial designs, as it helps to determine which specific means are significantly different when several comparisons are made. However, multiple comparisons can increase the chance of Type I errors, where a false positive occurs, making it crucial to apply correction methods.
Normality of Residuals: Normality of residuals refers to the assumption that the residuals, or the differences between observed and predicted values, are normally distributed in regression analysis. This assumption is crucial because it affects the validity of statistical tests and confidence intervals derived from the model. When residuals are normally distributed, it indicates that the model has appropriately captured the underlying relationships in the data, which is especially important in factorial designs where multiple factors are analyzed simultaneously.
Post Hoc Tests: Post hoc tests are statistical procedures conducted after an analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine which specific group means are different from each other. These tests are essential in factorial designs, as they help researchers understand the interactions and main effects by identifying significant differences among the levels of independent variables after finding a significant overall effect.
Power Analysis: Power analysis is a statistical method used to determine the sample size required for a study to detect an effect of a specified size with a given level of confidence. It plays a crucial role in experimental design, particularly in factorial designs, as it helps researchers understand the likelihood of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false. By optimizing sample size and minimizing resource waste, power analysis ensures that studies are both efficient and effective in identifying significant effects.
Psychological Experiments: Psychological experiments are systematic investigations designed to understand the relationships between variables, often involving manipulation of an independent variable to observe its effect on a dependent variable. These experiments are essential for establishing cause-and-effect relationships in psychology, particularly within the framework of factorial designs, where multiple independent variables are tested simultaneously to observe their interactions and individual effects.
Randomization: Randomization is the process of assigning study participants to different groups using random methods, ensuring that each participant has an equal chance of being placed in any group. This technique helps eliminate bias and ensures that the groups are comparable at the start of an experiment. By using randomization, researchers can more confidently attribute any observed effects to the treatments being studied rather than to pre-existing differences between groups.
Replication: Replication refers to the process of repeating a study or experiment to verify or validate findings. It is crucial in research as it helps establish the reliability and generalizability of results. By conducting replication studies, researchers can determine whether the original findings hold true across different settings, populations, or methods, which ultimately strengthens the evidence base in scientific inquiry.
Simple Effects Analysis: Simple effects analysis is a statistical technique used to examine the effect of one independent variable at specific levels of another independent variable in a factorial design. This analysis helps researchers understand how the relationship between variables changes depending on the levels of other variables, making it essential for interpreting interactions in complex experimental designs.
Treatment combinations: Treatment combinations refer to the different ways in which multiple treatments or interventions can be applied simultaneously in an experimental design. In factorial designs, researchers systematically investigate the effects of varying levels of these treatments on an outcome, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of how different factors interact with one another. This helps in identifying not only the main effects of each treatment but also the potential interaction effects that could influence the results.
Unbalanced Designs: Unbalanced designs refer to experimental setups where the number of observations or subjects in each treatment group is not equal. This often occurs in factorial designs where certain combinations of factors may have more data collected than others, leading to an unequal distribution of participants across different conditions. Such designs can affect statistical power and the interpretation of interactions between factors, making it essential to understand their implications in analysis.