9.1 Fault detection and diagnosis
11 min read•august 21, 2024
Fault detection and diagnosis are crucial components of autonomous vehicle systems, ensuring safe and reliable operation. These techniques identify abnormalities in system components, ranging from sudden sensor failures to gradual battery degradation.
Various methods, including model-based, data-driven, and signal-based approaches, are employed to detect faults. These systems play a vital role in maintaining vehicle performance, enabling predictive maintenance, and supporting regulatory compliance in the evolving autonomous vehicle industry.
Fundamentals of fault detection
- Fault detection forms a critical component in autonomous vehicle systems ensuring safe and reliable operation
- Encompasses various techniques to identify abnormalities or malfunctions in system components or processes
- Plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity and performance of complex autonomous systems
Types of faults
Top images from around the web for Types of faults
Frontiers | Identify incipient faults through similarity comparison with waveform split ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Explainer: Autonomous and Semi-autonomous vehicles – Ned Hayes View original
Is this image relevant?
A Novel Fault Detection, Identification and Prediction Approach for Autonomous Vehicle ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Identify incipient faults through similarity comparison with waveform split ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Explainer: Autonomous and Semi-autonomous vehicles – Ned Hayes View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Types of faults
Frontiers | Identify incipient faults through similarity comparison with waveform split ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Explainer: Autonomous and Semi-autonomous vehicles – Ned Hayes View original
Is this image relevant?
A Novel Fault Detection, Identification and Prediction Approach for Autonomous Vehicle ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Identify incipient faults through similarity comparison with waveform split ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Explainer: Autonomous and Semi-autonomous vehicles – Ned Hayes View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Abrupt faults occur suddenly and cause significant deviations from normal operation ()
- Incipient faults develop gradually over time and may be harder to detect (gradual degradation of battery performance)
- Intermittent faults appear and disappear unpredictably (loose electrical connections)
- Multiplicative faults affect the system's parameters or dynamics (changes in friction coefficients)
Fault detection methods
- Model-based methods utilize mathematical models of the system to compare expected and actual behavior
- Data-driven methods leverage historical data and machine learning algorithms to identify anomalies
- Signal-based methods analyze sensor signals for patterns or characteristics indicative of faults
- Knowledge-based methods use expert systems or rule-based approaches to diagnose faults based on predefined criteria
Importance in autonomous vehicles
- Ensures passenger safety by identifying potential hazards or system malfunctions before they become critical
- Maintains vehicle performance and efficiency by detecting and addressing issues early
- Supports regulatory compliance and liability management in the rapidly evolving autonomous vehicle industry
- Enables predictive maintenance strategies reducing downtime and operational costs
Sensor-based fault detection
- Utilizes data from various sensors installed throughout the autonomous vehicle to monitor system health
- Integrates multiple sensor inputs to create a comprehensive picture of vehicle status and performance
- Crucial for real-time detection of faults in critical components (brakes, steering, navigation systems)
Sensor redundancy
- Employs multiple sensors to measure the same parameter enhancing reliability and fault tolerance
- Implements voting systems to compare sensor outputs and identify discrepancies ()
- Utilizes diverse sensor types to measure the same variable reducing common mode failures
- Enables continued operation in case of single sensor failure maintaining system integrity
Data fusion techniques
- Kalman filtering combines data from multiple sensors to estimate the true state of the system
- Bayesian inference methods incorporate prior knowledge and sensor data to update belief about system state
- handles uncertainty and conflicting information from different sensors
- approaches deal with imprecise sensor data and linguistic rules for fault detection
Sensor calibration issues
- Addresses drift in sensor readings over time affecting accuracy of fault detection
- Implements auto-calibration routines to maintain sensor performance in varying environmental conditions
- Considers cross-calibration between different sensor types to ensure consistent measurements
- Manages the impact of temperature, vibration, and other external factors on sensor calibration
Model-based fault detection
- Relies on mathematical representations of the autonomous vehicle system to predict normal behavior
- Compares predicted outputs with actual sensor measurements to identify discrepancies indicating faults
- Provides a structured approach to fault detection based on system dynamics and known relationships
System modeling approaches
- represent the system as a set of first-order differential equations
- describe the input-output relationship in the frequency domain
- learn complex system behaviors from data without explicit mathematical formulation
- combine physics-based and data-driven approaches for more accurate system representation
Residual generation
- Calculates the difference between measured and model-predicted outputs known as residuals
- Implements parity equations to check consistency between different system variables
- Utilizes observer-based methods () to estimate system states and generate residuals
- Applies parameter estimation techniques to identify deviations from nominal system parameters
Threshold selection
- Determines appropriate thresholds for residuals to distinguish between normal variations and faults
- Implements adaptive thresholding techniques to account for changing operating conditions
- Utilizes statistical methods (hypothesis testing) to set thresholds based on desired false alarm rates
- Considers trade-offs between sensitivity to faults and robustness against false alarms in threshold selection
Data-driven fault detection
- Leverages large amounts of historical and real-time data collected from autonomous vehicles
- Utilizes advanced analytics and machine learning techniques to identify patterns indicative of faults
- Adapts to evolving system behavior and new fault modes through continuous learning
Machine learning algorithms
- Supervised learning methods (Support Vector Machines, Random Forests) classify normal and faulty conditions
- Unsupervised learning techniques (k-means clustering, autoencoders) detect anomalies without labeled data
- Deep learning models (Convolutional Neural Networks) process complex sensor data for fault detection
- Reinforcement learning algorithms optimize fault detection strategies based on long-term performance
Feature extraction
- Transforms raw sensor data into meaningful features for fault detection algorithms
- Time-domain features include statistical measures (mean, variance, skewness)
- Frequency-domain features utilize Fourier transforms to analyze signal characteristics
- Wavelet transforms provide time-frequency analysis for detecting transient fault signatures
- Dimensionality reduction techniques () extract most relevant features
Training data requirements
- Addresses the need for diverse and representative datasets covering normal and faulty conditions
- Considers data augmentation techniques to generate synthetic fault data for rare failure modes
- Implements active learning strategies to efficiently label new data points for model improvement
- Manages the balance between data quantity and quality to ensure robust fault detection performance
Fault diagnosis techniques
- Extends fault detection by identifying the specific nature, location, and severity of detected faults
- Crucial for determining appropriate response strategies and maintenance actions in autonomous vehicles
- Integrates multiple information sources and reasoning methods for accurate fault diagnosis
Root cause analysis
- Applies systematic approaches to trace faults back to their underlying causes
- Utilizes fault tree analysis to map out potential failure pathways and their relationships
- Implements fishbone diagrams (Ishikawa diagrams) to categorize and visualize potential root causes
- Considers both technical and operational factors in identifying the primary source of faults
Fault isolation methods
- Employs structured hypothesis testing to narrow down the location of faults within the system
- Utilizes diagnostic inference engines based on system topology and component relationships
- Implements fault signature analysis to match observed symptoms with known fault patterns
- Considers the propagation of faults through the system to identify the original source
Diagnostic reasoning
- Applies expert system approaches using predefined rules and heuristics for fault diagnosis
- Utilizes case-based reasoning to compare current fault scenarios with historical cases
- Implements fuzzy logic reasoning to handle uncertainty and imprecision in diagnostic information
- Considers probabilistic reasoning methods () to update fault hypotheses based on evidence
Real-time fault detection
- Focuses on detecting and diagnosing faults in autonomous vehicles during operation
- Balances the need for quick detection with computational limitations of onboard systems
- Critical for enabling immediate response to potential safety hazards or performance issues
Computational efficiency
- Optimizes fault detection algorithms for execution on embedded hardware platforms
- Utilizes parallel processing techniques to distribute computational load across multiple processors
- Implements efficient data structures and algorithms to minimize memory usage and processing time
- Considers hardware acceleration (GPUs, FPGAs) for computationally intensive fault detection tasks
Latency considerations
- Addresses the time delay between fault occurrence and detection in safety-critical systems
- Implements sliding window techniques for continuous monitoring with minimal latency
- Utilizes event-triggered fault detection methods to reduce unnecessary computations
- Considers the trade-off between detection speed and accuracy in algorithm design
Resource allocation
- Manages the distribution of computational resources among different fault detection tasks
- Implements priority-based scheduling to ensure critical fault detection processes receive adequate resources
- Utilizes dynamic resource allocation strategies to adapt to changing vehicle operating conditions
- Considers energy efficiency in resource allocation to maximize battery life in electric autonomous vehicles
Fault detection in critical systems
- Focuses on identifying faults in components crucial for safe operation of autonomous vehicles
- Implements stringent reliability and measures to minimize the risk of undetected faults
- Balances the need for comprehensive fault detection with system cost and complexity considerations
Safety-critical components
- Prioritizes fault detection in steering, braking, and navigation systems essential for vehicle control
- Implements specialized fault detection methods for sensor fusion algorithms and decision-making units
- Considers fault detection in communication systems critical for vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure interactions
- Addresses fault detection in power management systems crucial for electric and hybrid autonomous vehicles
Redundancy vs cost
- Evaluates the trade-offs between implementing redundant systems and increasing vehicle cost
- Considers analytical redundancy methods to achieve fault tolerance without duplicating hardware
- Implements diversity in redundant components to reduce common mode failures
- Analyzes the cost-benefit ratio of different redundancy strategies in terms of safety improvement and market competitiveness
Fail-safe mechanisms
- Designs fault detection systems to trigger safe operating modes upon detection of critical faults
- Implements graceful degradation strategies to maintain basic functionality in the presence of faults
- Considers fail-operational designs for systems where complete shutdown is not a safe option
- Utilizes watchdog timers and other hardware-based safety mechanisms as a last line of defense
Fault detection challenges
- Addresses the complexities and limitations in implementing effective fault detection systems
- Considers the dynamic and uncertain nature of autonomous vehicle operations
- Balances the need for sensitive fault detection with robustness against false alarms
Environmental factors
- Accounts for varying weather conditions (rain, snow, fog) affecting sensor performance and fault detection
- Considers the impact of electromagnetic interference on electronic systems and sensor readings
- Addresses challenges in fault detection during extreme temperature conditions affecting component behavior
- Implements adaptive fault detection strategies to handle changing road conditions and traffic scenarios
System complexity
- Manages the interdependencies between multiple subsystems in fault detection and diagnosis
- Addresses challenges in fault propagation analysis in highly interconnected autonomous vehicle systems
- Considers the impact of software complexity and frequent updates on fault detection reliability
- Implements modular fault detection architectures to manage complexity and facilitate system maintenance
False alarms vs missed detections
- Balances the trade-off between sensitivity to faults and susceptibility to false alarms
- Implements multi-stage fault detection processes to reduce false positives while maintaining sensitivity
- Considers the consequences of missed detections in safety-critical systems and designs accordingly
- Utilizes probabilistic approaches to quantify uncertainty in fault detection and inform decision-making
Fault detection standards
- Outlines regulatory requirements and industry standards for fault detection in autonomous vehicles
- Ensures compliance with safety regulations and best practices in automotive system design
- Provides a framework for consistent evaluation and certification of fault detection systems
ISO 26262 compliance
- Addresses functional safety requirements for electrical and electronic systems in road vehicles
- Implements systematic approaches to hazard analysis and risk assessment in fault detection design
- Considers the entire system lifecycle from concept development to decommissioning in safety planning
- Requires documentation and traceability of safety requirements and their implementation in fault detection systems
ASIL levels
- Defines (ASIL) ranging from A (lowest) to D (highest) based on risk
- Determines appropriate fault detection and diagnostic coverage based on the ASIL of each system component
- Implements more stringent fault detection and redundancy measures for higher ASIL levels
- Considers the impact of ASIL requirements on system architecture and fault detection strategy selection
Regulatory requirements
- Addresses country-specific regulations for autonomous vehicle safety and fault detection
- Considers evolving standards for testing and validation of fault detection systems in autonomous vehicles
- Implements reporting and logging mechanisms for fault detection events to comply with regulatory oversight
- Addresses ethical considerations and liability issues related to fault detection and vehicle decision-making
Fault detection integration
- Focuses on incorporating fault detection systems into the overall autonomous vehicle architecture
- Ensures seamless interaction between fault detection modules and other vehicle subsystems
- Considers the impact of fault detection on overall system performance and reliability
System architecture considerations
- Designs modular fault detection systems that can be easily integrated and updated
- Implements layered architectures separating low-level fault detection from high-level decision-making
- Considers the distribution of fault detection tasks between edge devices and central processing units
- Addresses the integration of fault detection with other safety-critical systems (collision avoidance, emergency braking)
Communication protocols
- Utilizes robust and secure communication protocols for transmitting fault detection information
- Implements time-triggered communication architectures for deterministic fault reporting
- Considers the use of automotive-specific protocols (CAN, FlexRay) for fault detection communication
- Addresses cybersecurity concerns in fault detection communication to prevent malicious interference
Fault response strategies
- Develops comprehensive strategies for responding to detected faults in real-time
- Implements graceful degradation modes to maintain safe operation in the presence of non-critical faults
- Considers the integration of fault detection with vehicle control systems for automatic fault mitigation
- Addresses human-machine interface design for effectively communicating fault information to passengers or remote operators
Performance evaluation
- Assesses the effectiveness and reliability of fault detection systems in autonomous vehicles
- Implements rigorous testing and validation procedures to ensure fault detection performance
- Considers both quantitative metrics and qualitative assessments in evaluating fault detection systems
Metrics for fault detection
- Utilizes detection rate (sensitivity) to measure the proportion of actual faults correctly identified
- Considers false alarm rate (specificity) to assess the system's ability to avoid false positives
- Implements detection time metrics to evaluate the speed of fault identification
- Considers robustness metrics to assess fault detection performance under varying conditions
Testing methodologies
- Implements hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) testing to evaluate fault detection in simulated environments
- Utilizes fault injection techniques to artificially introduce faults and assess detection performance
- Considers scenario-based testing to evaluate fault detection in realistic operating conditions
- Implements long-duration tests to assess the reliability of fault detection over extended periods
Validation procedures
- Develops comprehensive test plans covering a wide range of fault scenarios and operating conditions
- Implements cross-validation techniques to ensure fault detection performance across different datasets
- Considers independent third-party validation to ensure objectivity in performance assessment
- Addresses the challenges of validating fault detection for rare or critical fault scenarios
Future trends
- Explores emerging technologies and approaches in fault detection for autonomous vehicles
- Considers the impact of advancements in artificial intelligence and data analytics on fault detection
- Addresses the evolving requirements for fault detection in increasingly complex and connected vehicle systems
AI-enhanced fault detection
- Utilizes deep learning models for more accurate and adaptive fault detection
- Implements reinforcement learning techniques for optimizing fault detection strategies over time
- Considers the use of explainable AI methods to provide insights into fault detection decisions
- Addresses the challenges of integrating AI-based fault detection with traditional rule-based approaches
Predictive maintenance
- Extends fault detection to predict potential failures before they occur
- Utilizes prognostics and health management (PHM) techniques to estimate remaining useful life of components
- Implements data-driven models to identify patterns indicative of impending faults
- Considers the integration of predictive maintenance with vehicle scheduling and logistics systems
Self-healing systems
- Explores technologies enabling autonomous vehicles to automatically recover from certain faults
- Implements adaptive control techniques to compensate for detected faults in real-time
- Considers the use of reconfigurable hardware and software architectures for fault tolerance
- Addresses the challenges and limitations of self-healing capabilities in safety-critical systems
Key Terms to Review (29)
Automotive safety integrity levels: Automotive safety integrity levels (ASIL) are a set of classifications defined in ISO 26262 that determine the necessary safety measures needed for automotive systems based on their potential risks. These levels range from ASIL A, which requires the least stringent safety measures, to ASIL D, which mandates the highest safety requirements due to the increased risk associated with system failures. Understanding ASIL is crucial for implementing effective fault detection and diagnosis strategies within automotive systems.
AUTOSAR: AUTOSAR, or Automotive Open System Architecture, is a global development partnership of automotive stakeholders aimed at creating a standardized software architecture for vehicle systems. This framework allows for modular design and helps ensure compatibility between different vehicle components, enabling easier integration of complex software and hardware. AUTOSAR facilitates collaboration among various manufacturers and suppliers, making it crucial for advancing vehicle architectures, sensor fusion techniques, and fault detection systems.
Bayesian Networks: Bayesian networks are probabilistic graphical models that represent a set of variables and their conditional dependencies via a directed acyclic graph. They enable the modeling of uncertainty and the inference of unknown variables based on known data, making them useful for reasoning in complex systems. This modeling approach is particularly valuable in areas like motion detection, behavior prediction, decision-making algorithms, and fault detection, where understanding relationships between variables under uncertainty is crucial.
Dempster-Shafer Theory: Dempster-Shafer Theory is a mathematical framework for reasoning with uncertainty, enabling the combination of evidence from different sources to make inferences. It expands on traditional probability theory by allowing for degrees of belief rather than assigning exact probabilities, which is particularly useful in fault detection and diagnosis where information can be incomplete or ambiguous.
Detection latency: Detection latency refers to the time delay between the occurrence of a fault in a system and the moment it is detected by the monitoring mechanisms in place. This delay can significantly impact system performance and safety, particularly in environments where timely responses are crucial. Understanding detection latency is essential for developing effective fault detection strategies, as minimizing this latency can lead to quicker diagnosis and resolution of issues.
Diagnostic management systems: Diagnostic management systems are specialized frameworks or software tools designed to monitor, identify, and resolve faults in various systems, including autonomous vehicles. They integrate fault detection and diagnosis to provide real-time insights into system performance and help maintain operational reliability, ensuring safety and efficiency in automated processes.
Diagnostic reasoning: Diagnostic reasoning refers to the cognitive process used to identify the nature of a problem or fault within a system, typically involving the integration of data, knowledge, and experience to reach a conclusion. This reasoning process is essential for effectively diagnosing faults in complex systems, allowing for timely and appropriate interventions to maintain functionality and safety.
Fail-safe mechanisms: Fail-safe mechanisms are safety features designed to prevent catastrophic failures in systems by ensuring that a system defaults to a safe condition in the event of a malfunction or error. These mechanisms are crucial for maintaining the reliability and safety of autonomous systems, where unexpected failures can lead to hazardous situations. They work by detecting faults, employing redundancy, and managing edge cases to ensure continued operation or safe shutdown.
False Positive Rate: The false positive rate is a statistical measure that quantifies the proportion of negative instances incorrectly classified as positive by a detection system. It reflects how often a system mistakenly identifies an object, obstacle, or condition when it is not present, which can have critical implications in safety and performance for various technologies. Understanding and minimizing false positive rates are essential for improving the reliability and effectiveness of systems that rely on accurate detection, recognition, and monitoring.
Fault isolation: Fault isolation is the process of identifying and isolating a fault within a system to prevent it from affecting the overall operation. This involves determining the specific component or subsystem that has failed, allowing for effective troubleshooting and repair while minimizing disruptions to the rest of the system. It is a critical step in fault detection and diagnosis, ensuring that problems can be addressed efficiently without impacting system performance.
Fuzzy logic: Fuzzy logic is a form of many-valued logic that deals with reasoning that is approximate rather than fixed and exact. Unlike traditional binary logic, where variables must be either true or false, fuzzy logic allows for degrees of truth, making it particularly useful in situations with uncertainty or imprecision. This approach is essential for integrating data from multiple sources and diagnosing faults in complex systems, as it provides a framework to handle varying levels of information quality and reliability.
Hardware-in-the-loop testing: Hardware-in-the-loop testing is a simulation technique that integrates real hardware components with virtual models to evaluate and validate the performance of systems, particularly in autonomous vehicles. This method allows for the real-time testing of control algorithms and system interactions, providing insights into the behavior of both hardware and software before deployment. It plays a crucial role in ensuring safety and reliability in various functions, including vehicle control, fault detection, and fail-safe mechanisms.
Hybrid Models: Hybrid models refer to approaches that combine multiple methodologies or techniques to improve system performance, particularly in the context of fault detection and diagnosis. These models leverage the strengths of both data-driven and model-based methods, enabling a more robust and accurate identification of faults in complex systems. By integrating these different approaches, hybrid models can adapt to a variety of operational conditions and provide better insights into system behavior.
ISO 26262: ISO 26262 is an international standard for functional safety in the automotive industry, specifically addressing the safety of electrical and electronic systems within vehicles. It provides a framework for ensuring that these systems operate reliably and can mitigate risks, which is crucial as vehicles become increasingly autonomous and complex.
Kalman Filter: The Kalman filter is a mathematical algorithm that provides estimates of unknown variables by using a series of measurements observed over time, incorporating uncertainties in the measurement and the model. This technique is essential in refining the accuracy of data from various sensors, making it crucial for applications like motion tracking, localization, and sensor fusion.
Luenberger Observers: Luenberger observers are state observers used in control systems to estimate the internal state of a dynamic system based on its outputs and inputs. They are essential for fault detection and diagnosis because they help to identify discrepancies between the observed output and the expected output, allowing for timely detection of faults in the system.
Model-based diagnosis: Model-based diagnosis is a systematic approach to identifying faults in a system by using a model of the system's expected behavior to compare against actual performance. This technique leverages mathematical models and simulations to analyze discrepancies, allowing for more accurate detection of faults and their potential causes. By establishing a baseline of normal operation, model-based diagnosis can effectively pinpoint deviations that indicate malfunctioning components or systems.
NASA's Autonomous Systems: NASA's Autonomous Systems refer to advanced technologies and methodologies designed for enabling machines, especially spacecraft and rovers, to operate independently with minimal human intervention. These systems are crucial for exploring remote environments, conducting scientific missions, and ensuring safety through real-time decision-making capabilities in complex situations.
Neural network models: Neural network models are computational frameworks inspired by the structure and function of the human brain, used to recognize patterns, learn from data, and make predictions. These models consist of interconnected nodes or 'neurons' that process information in layers, allowing them to capture complex relationships within the data. They are particularly useful in tasks such as fault detection and diagnosis because they can identify anomalies and predict potential failures based on input signals.
Principal Component Analysis: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a statistical technique used to reduce the dimensionality of data while preserving as much variance as possible. By transforming the original variables into a new set of uncorrelated variables called principal components, PCA helps in simplifying complex datasets and identifying patterns. It is particularly valuable in applications where data visualization, noise reduction, and feature extraction are essential, making it relevant across various machine learning approaches.
Redundancy: Redundancy refers to the inclusion of extra components or systems in a design to ensure reliability and continued operation in case of failure. This concept is crucial in various high-stakes environments where failure can lead to catastrophic consequences, such as autonomous vehicles, where multiple systems work together to provide safety and functionality. The idea is to prevent a single point of failure by having backup systems that can take over if the primary system fails, ensuring that the overall system remains operational and safe.
RoboCup: RoboCup is an international robotics competition that aims to promote research and education in robotics and artificial intelligence through the organization of various leagues, including soccer, rescue, and industrial robots. The competition encourages innovation and collaboration among researchers while fostering advancements in fault detection and diagnosis within robotic systems, essential for their successful operation and performance in dynamic environments.
Self-diagnosis systems: Self-diagnosis systems refer to automated mechanisms that monitor and assess their own performance and health status, identifying faults or anomalies without human intervention. These systems play a crucial role in ensuring reliability and safety by detecting issues early, enabling timely maintenance or corrective actions, and minimizing downtime in various applications like autonomous vehicles.
Sensor failure: Sensor failure refers to the inability of a sensor to accurately measure or transmit data, which can lead to incorrect information being relayed to an autonomous vehicle's systems. This can have serious consequences for vehicle operation, including compromised safety and performance, as the reliability of data is critical for decision-making processes in autonomous systems.
Signal Processing: Signal processing is the technique of analyzing, modifying, and synthesizing signals such as sound, images, and sensor data to improve their quality or extract meaningful information. This involves various algorithms and methods that enhance the ability of systems to interpret real-world phenomena by filtering out noise, detecting patterns, or converting signals into usable formats. In the realm of technology, it plays a crucial role in interpreting data from sensors, tracking movements accurately, and diagnosing faults in systems.
Software bugs: Software bugs are errors, flaws, or unintended behaviors in computer programs that can lead to incorrect results or system failures. These issues can arise from coding mistakes, logical errors, or unforeseen interactions within the software, often requiring fault detection and diagnosis methods to identify and resolve them effectively.
State-space models: State-space models are mathematical frameworks used to represent dynamic systems in terms of state variables and equations that describe their behavior over time. These models allow for the analysis and control of systems by capturing both the internal states and inputs, making them valuable in various engineering applications, including fault detection and diagnosis.
Transfer Function Models: Transfer function models are mathematical representations that describe the relationship between the input and output of a system in the frequency domain. These models are essential for analyzing and designing control systems, particularly in assessing system behavior and stability in response to various inputs, such as disturbances or faults. They allow for the understanding of how changes in input affect system output, which is critical for effective fault detection and diagnosis.
Triple Modular Redundancy: Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) is a fault-tolerant design approach that uses three identical modules to process the same information simultaneously, ensuring that even if one module fails, the overall system can continue to function correctly. This redundancy helps improve reliability and maintain performance in systems where failures can have serious consequences, such as in autonomous vehicles. TMR not only aids in fault detection but also in diagnosis by allowing comparison among the outputs of the three modules.