6.2 Investigative interview strategies
3 min read•august 6, 2024
Investigative interviews are crucial for uncovering hidden truths. They require careful planning, strategic questioning, and a deep understanding of various interview types. From background chats to confrontational face-offs, journalists must navigate complex scenarios to get the facts.
Developing a solid is key to guiding the inquiry. Reporters use research methods like paper trails and to gather evidence. They must also navigate legal and ethical considerations, protecting sources while ensuring accurate, fair reporting.
Interview Types
Background and Confidentiality
Top images from around the web for Background and Confidentiality
On the record | UCT News View original
Is this image relevant?
Confidential - Highlighted Words and Phrases View original
Is this image relevant?
On the record | UCT News View original
Is this image relevant?
On the record | UCT News View original
Is this image relevant?
Confidential - Highlighted Words and Phrases View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Background and Confidentiality
On the record | UCT News View original
Is this image relevant?
Confidential - Highlighted Words and Phrases View original
Is this image relevant?
On the record | UCT News View original
Is this image relevant?
On the record | UCT News View original
Is this image relevant?
Confidential - Highlighted Words and Phrases View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Deep provide information to help understand context but cannot be directly quoted or attributed to the source
- Off-the-record interviews are not for publication and cannot be used in reporting without confirmation from another source
- On-the-record interviews can be quoted and attributed directly to the named source
- provide information on the condition that their identity remains secret
- Journalists must protect the anonymity of confidential sources
- Information from confidential sources often requires additional verification
Confrontational Interviews
- involve questioning sources about controversial or sensitive topics
- Often used when sources are being evasive or dishonest
- Requires careful preparation and evidence to support the line of questioning
- Journalists must maintain composure and professionalism even in tense confrontational interviews (political scandals, corporate wrongdoing)
Investigative Techniques
Research Methods
- refers to following a series of documents to uncover information
- Includes official records, financial statements, correspondence (emails, memos)
- Helps establish timeline of events and actions taken
- involves closely examining documents for inconsistencies, omissions or patterns
- Comparing multiple versions of a document can reveal changes or redactions
- Metadata like date stamps and author information provides additional context
- Snowball sampling starts with one source and expands outward as each source suggests additional people to interview
- Helps uncover networks of people with knowledge of an issue
- Particularly useful in investigating closed systems (government agencies, corporations)
Developing an Investigative Hypothesis
- An investigative hypothesis is a statement of what the journalist believes the investigation will reveal
- Provides direction and focus for the investigation
- Should be based on initial research and evolve as new information emerges
- A well-formed hypothesis is specific, stating the who, what, where, when and how of the story
- Overly broad: "The mayor is corrupt"
- Specific: "The mayor awarded city contracts to campaign donors between 2018-2020"
- Investigative hypotheses are not published but guide the journalist's inquiry and gathering of evidence
Legal and Ethical Considerations
Protecting Sources
- are insiders who reveal wrongdoing within an organization
- Whistleblower protection laws shield employees from retaliation for reporting misconduct
- Journalists have a moral obligation to safeguard whistleblowers who come forward
- in some states give journalists the right to refuse to disclose confidential sources
- Journalists have gone to jail to protect source (Judith Miller, New York Times)
- In the absence of shield laws, journalists must weigh the ethics of promising confidentiality
Ethical Reporting Practices
- Journalists must verify information before publication to ensure accuracy
- Relying on a single source risks spreading misinformation
- Fairness requires giving subjects of investigative reports a chance to respond to allegations
- or microphones should only be used if information cannot be obtained by other means
- Undercover tactics can be seen as a breach of trust
- Any decision to use covert methods must be justified by the public interest in the story
- Paying sources for information is considered unethical by most mainstream journalists
- May incentivize sources to fabricate or sensationalize information for financial gain
- Exceptions may be made for licensing photos or videos from eyewitnesses to major events
Key Terms to Review (27)
Background interviews: Background interviews are informational discussions conducted to gather personal or contextual information about a subject, often to inform the development of a more in-depth interview or investigation. These interviews help to establish context, clarify facts, and reveal additional avenues of inquiry, ensuring that the interviewer is well-prepared and informed about the subject matter before proceeding with further questioning.
Closed-ended questions: Closed-ended questions are inquiries that provide limited response options, typically requiring a simple 'yes' or 'no,' or selecting from predefined choices. These questions serve specific purposes in interviews, such as gathering straightforward information, facilitating quantitative analysis, and maintaining control over the conversation.
Cognitive Interviewing: Cognitive interviewing is a technique used to enhance the retrieval of memories from witnesses or victims during investigative interviews. It encourages individuals to recreate the context of an event, which can lead to more accurate and detailed recollections. By utilizing specific cognitive techniques, this method reduces the likelihood of misinformation and helps interviewers gather valuable information that may otherwise be lost.
Confidential Sources: Confidential sources are individuals who provide information to journalists or investigators under the promise that their identity will be kept secret. This practice is crucial in investigative work, as it encourages whistleblowers and others to share vital information without fear of repercussions. The use of confidential sources raises ethical considerations regarding transparency and accountability in reporting.
Confidentiality: Confidentiality refers to the ethical and legal obligation to protect the privacy of information shared by individuals during an interview. This concept is crucial for building trust with interviewees and ensuring that sensitive information remains secure and is not disclosed without consent.
Confrontational interviews: Confrontational interviews are a type of interview strategy characterized by direct and often aggressive questioning aimed at eliciting information or confessions from subjects. This approach is commonly used in investigative contexts to challenge the interviewee’s statements and expose inconsistencies, but it has also made its mark in iconic television interviews, where tension can lead to dramatic exchanges and memorable moments.
Document analysis: Document analysis is the process of reviewing and interpreting documents to gather information relevant to a specific investigation or research inquiry. This method can provide valuable insights into various aspects of a case, such as context, background, and evidence, making it an essential part of investigative interview strategies. Analyzing documents can uncover discrepancies, support witness statements, or provide leads for further questioning.
Ethical reporting practices: Ethical reporting practices refer to the principles and standards that journalists and interviewers should follow to ensure accuracy, fairness, and integrity in their reporting. These practices emphasize the importance of truthfulness, transparency, and respect for individuals' rights and privacy, aiming to promote responsible journalism that serves the public interest. Adhering to ethical reporting practices is essential for building trust with the audience and maintaining the credibility of the profession.
Hidden cameras: Hidden cameras are surveillance devices designed to capture video footage discreetly without the knowledge of the individuals being recorded. They are often used in investigative interviews to gather evidence or insights that may not be obtained through direct questioning, as they can reveal genuine reactions and behaviors in natural settings.
Informed Consent: Informed consent is the process of obtaining permission from an individual before conducting an interview or gathering sensitive information, ensuring that the person fully understands what participation involves. This includes clearly explaining the purpose of the interview, how the information will be used, and any potential risks, thus protecting the rights and privacy of the interviewee.
Interview dynamics: Interview dynamics refer to the interplay of factors that influence the flow and effectiveness of an interview, including the relationship between the interviewer and interviewee, communication styles, and environmental conditions. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for establishing rapport, eliciting truthful responses, and managing the overall tone of the interaction. These elements can significantly impact the outcome of investigative interviews, guiding the direction of questioning and responses.
Interview Setting: The interview setting refers to the physical and psychological environment in which an interview takes place, influencing the dynamics between the interviewer and the interviewee. A well-chosen setting can foster open communication, create comfort, and establish trust, which are crucial for obtaining accurate information and insights. Factors such as location, ambiance, noise levels, and the seating arrangement all play significant roles in shaping the interview experience and outcomes.
Investigative Hypothesis: An investigative hypothesis is a proposed explanation or assumption that guides the direction of an investigation, often formed based on preliminary evidence or observations. This hypothesis helps investigators focus their questioning and gather relevant information to confirm or refute their initial assumptions, ultimately aiding in uncovering the truth behind a case.
Mirroring: Mirroring is a communication technique where one person subtly mimics the gestures, speech patterns, or attitudes of another to create a sense of connection and understanding. This practice can help in building trust and rapport, making the interviewee feel more comfortable and open during interactions. By reflecting the behavior of others, it fosters a more engaged and responsive environment that can enhance the overall effectiveness of the conversation.
Nonverbal cues: Nonverbal cues are the various signals we send through body language, facial expressions, gestures, posture, and eye contact that can convey messages without the use of words. These cues are crucial for effective communication and can enhance understanding, build rapport, and even influence the emotional tone of an interaction.
Open-ended questions: Open-ended questions are inquiries that allow for a full, meaningful answer using the subject's own knowledge and feelings, rather than simply a 'yes' or 'no' response. These questions encourage interviewees to express their thoughts and provide more detailed information, which is essential for gathering insights in various interviewing contexts.
Paper trail: A paper trail refers to a series of documents, records, or other forms of evidence that chronologically track a sequence of events or actions. In the context of investigative interview strategies, having a clear paper trail is essential for establishing the authenticity of information and ensuring accountability throughout the investigation process.
Post-interview phase: The post-interview phase refers to the period following the completion of an interview, where the interviewer evaluates the information gathered, reflects on the interaction, and determines the next steps in the investigative process. This phase is crucial for synthesizing insights from the interview, considering the validity of responses, and planning further actions, such as follow-up interviews or additional investigations.
Pre-interview phase: The pre-interview phase is the initial stage of the interview process where preparation occurs before engaging with the interviewee. This phase involves gathering information, setting objectives, and determining the appropriate approach to effectively elicit valuable insights during the interview. It's crucial for building rapport and establishing a comfortable environment that encourages open communication.
Rapport building: Rapport building is the process of establishing a positive, trusting relationship between the interviewer and the interviewee, which is essential for effective communication and information exchange. This connection enhances the comfort level of the interviewee, encouraging openness and honesty, which leads to richer and more insightful responses during the interview.
Shield Laws: Shield laws are legal protections that allow journalists and reporters to refuse to disclose confidential sources or unpublished information in legal proceedings. These laws are essential in safeguarding the freedom of the press and encouraging whistleblowers to share sensitive information without fear of repercussions. They play a crucial role in ensuring that the public receives vital information while protecting the identity of those who provide it.
Snowball Sampling: Snowball sampling is a non-probability sampling technique where existing study subjects recruit future subjects from among their acquaintances. This method is especially useful for accessing hard-to-reach populations and can build a larger sample size through the connections of initial participants. As participants refer others, the sample grows like a snowball, facilitating the gathering of data in investigative interviews.
Statement analysis: Statement analysis is a technique used to evaluate the content and structure of verbal and written statements to assess their truthfulness and reliability. This method helps investigators identify inconsistencies, omissions, and potential deception by examining language patterns, the choice of words, and the overall narrative structure of the statements provided by witnesses or suspects.
Strategic Pauses: Strategic pauses are intentional breaks during a conversation or interview that allow both the interviewer and the interviewee to reflect, process information, and create space for deeper insights. These pauses can enhance the quality of responses by encouraging the interviewee to think more critically and provide richer details. By incorporating strategic pauses, the interviewer can manage the flow of dialogue, prompting further elaboration or clarification without pressure.
Suggestibility: Suggestibility refers to the degree to which an individual's memory, perception, or beliefs can be influenced by external suggestions or leading questions. This phenomenon plays a crucial role in investigative interviews, where the way questions are framed can significantly impact the information provided by witnesses or suspects, potentially leading to inaccuracies in their testimonies.
Truthfulness assessment: Truthfulness assessment refers to the techniques and strategies used to evaluate the veracity of a person’s statements during an interview or interrogation. This process involves analyzing verbal and non-verbal cues, consistency of information, and employing psychological methods to discern truth from deception. Accurate assessments are crucial for investigators to determine the credibility of witnesses and suspects, making it an integral part of investigative interviewing.
Whistleblowers: Whistleblowers are individuals who report or expose misconduct, illegal activities, or unethical behavior within an organization. Their actions are often crucial in bringing attention to issues that may otherwise remain hidden, making them integral to transparency and accountability in both public and private sectors. By speaking out, they often face significant personal and professional risks, yet their contributions can foster positive change and uphold public interest.