10.3 Handling off-the-record information
3 min read•august 6, 2024
Handling off-the-record info is tricky. You need to know the different levels of and how to use them. It's crucial to confirm with sources exactly how their info can be used and to protect confidential sources.
Ethical journalists must balance their duty to inform the public with their promise to protect sources. Understanding journalistic privilege and helps navigate these murky waters. It's a constant juggling act of trust and transparency.
Types of Off-the-Record Information
Levels of Attribution
Top images from around the web for Levels of Attribution
Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
Qualitative Data Science: Using RQDA to analyse interviews View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Levels of Attribution
Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
Qualitative Data Science: Using RQDA to analyse interviews View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Off-the-record information cannot be published or shared with anyone outside the conversation
- Interviewee must explicitly state information is off-the-record before sharing it
- If interviewer has already heard the information elsewhere, they may be able to use it depending on the specific agreement made
- can be published but not attributed to the source
- Often used to provide context or clarification without directly quoting the source
- Allows sources to speak more candidly without fear of direct attribution
- information can be used to inform the interviewer's understanding but cannot be published in any form
- Most restrictive level of attribution
- Information is only for the interviewer's knowledge and cannot be referenced directly or indirectly in the final product
- Information given on condition of "not for attribution" can be published but only as a paraphrase without naming or identifying the source
- Interviewer must take care not to inadvertently identify the source through the details or phrasing used
- Often used when a source is not authorized to speak publicly on a topic but can provide valuable insight
Confirming Attributions
- Interviewer should clarify the specific terms of attribution before the interview begins
- Ensures both parties have a shared understanding of how information can be used
- Prevents misunderstandings that could damage trust or relationships
- If the terms of attribution change during the interview, interviewer should confirm this explicitly
- Example: "Just to clarify, you're now telling me this portion is on background rather than off-the-record?"
- Interviewers should take detailed notes on what level of attribution applies to each piece of information
- Helps prevent accidental breaches of confidentiality
- Provides a record in case of later disputes
Protecting Sources and Information
Maintaining Confidentiality
- Journalists have an ethical obligation to protect confidential sources
- Revealing sources can put them at risk of legal, professional, or personal retaliation
- Broken confidentiality undermines trust in journalists and discourages future sources from coming forward
- Interviewers should have a clear understanding with sources about the scope and duration of confidentiality
- Example: Will the source's identity remain confidential indefinitely, or only until a certain event or date?
- Putting confidentiality agreements in writing can prevent later misunderstandings
- Interviewers must take precautions to avoid unintentionally exposing confidential sources
- Minimize how many people know the source's identity
- Keep files and notes secure and encrypted where possible
- Avoid including clues in the final product that could allow others to identify the source
Journalistic Privilege
- In some jurisdictions, journalists can claim legal privilege to avoid revealing confidential sources
- Shield laws vary widely by location and circumstance
- Privilege is not absolute and may not apply in cases of eyewitness testimony, defamation suits, or national security issues
- Journalists should understand the specific laws and precedents that apply in their jurisdiction
- Consult legal experts for guidance on when privilege does and does not apply
- Be prepared to weigh legal risks against ethical obligations to protect sources
- Claiming journalistic privilege can be costly and time-consuming
- News organizations may incur substantial legal fees
- Individual journalists may face fines or even jail time for refusing to reveal sources
- Relationships with sources can be strained by legal battles even when confidentiality is ultimately preserved
Key Terms to Review (16)
Attribution: Attribution is the process of identifying the source of information or quotes in interviews, crucial for maintaining transparency and credibility in journalism. It involves clearly indicating who provided specific information, which helps audiences understand the context and reliability of the statements made. Proper attribution also protects journalists and interviewees by ensuring that information is accurately represented and verified.
Background information: Background information refers to the context, history, or relevant details surrounding a subject or individual that help provide deeper understanding. This information is crucial in interviews as it allows interviewers to craft insightful questions and engage meaningfully with the interviewee's experiences and perspectives.
Clear Communication: Clear communication refers to the effective exchange of information where the intended message is easily understood by the receiver. It involves using straightforward language, maintaining transparency, and ensuring that both parties have a mutual understanding of the information being shared. This concept is essential in various settings, as it fosters trust and facilitates meaningful interactions, particularly when addressing sensitive topics or emotional situations.
Confidentiality Agreements: Confidentiality agreements are legal contracts that establish a confidential relationship between parties to protect sensitive information shared during interactions. These agreements are crucial for ensuring that off-the-record information is not disclosed to unauthorized individuals, allowing for open and honest communication without fear of exposure. They serve as a safeguard for both the disclosing and receiving parties, providing a framework for trust and security in sensitive discussions.
Controversial subjects: Controversial subjects are topics that provoke strong, differing opinions and emotions among individuals or groups. They often touch on sensitive issues like politics, religion, or social justice, and can create a challenging environment for discussion, especially when the perspectives involved are deeply held and polarized.
Corroboration: Corroboration is the process of confirming or supporting information by obtaining additional evidence or testimony from various sources. This practice is crucial in establishing the credibility of information, especially when dealing with sensitive topics or when information is shared off-the-record. By corroborating details, journalists and interviewers can ensure accuracy and reliability, leading to a more truthful narrative.
Deep background: Deep background refers to a type of off-the-record information provided by a source to a journalist, where the information can be used to inform the journalist's understanding but cannot be attributed to the source in any way. This level of confidentiality allows sources to share sensitive insights that might not be available for public disclosure, fostering a trust-based relationship between journalists and their sources. It helps journalists gather context and nuance for their stories while protecting the identities of those who provide them with vital information.
Fact-checking: Fact-checking is the process of verifying the accuracy and truthfulness of information presented in interviews, reports, or other forms of media. This practice is essential for maintaining credibility and integrity in journalism, ensuring that the information disseminated to the public is both accurate and reliable.
Journalistic integrity: Journalistic integrity refers to the ethical standards and principles that guide journalists in their reporting, ensuring accuracy, fairness, and accountability. It encompasses a commitment to truthfulness and independence, allowing journalists to present information responsibly while respecting their audience's trust. This integrity is crucial when managing difficult interviewees, handling sensitive off-the-record information, and conducting landmark interviews that shape public perception.
Legal repercussions: Legal repercussions refer to the consequences that may arise from actions that violate laws or agreements, particularly in the context of confidentiality and information sharing. These repercussions can include civil lawsuits, criminal charges, or penalties that impact the individuals involved, especially when handling sensitive information such as off-the-record statements during interviews.
Mutual understanding: Mutual understanding refers to a shared comprehension and agreement between parties involved in communication, fostering trust and openness in dialogue. It is essential for effective exchanges, allowing individuals to connect on a deeper level, ensuring that information is conveyed accurately and that both sides feel heard and respected. This understanding becomes particularly important when handling sensitive information or discussing topics that require confidentiality.
Off-the-record agreement: An off-the-record agreement is a mutual understanding between a journalist and a source where the information shared is not to be published or attributed. This type of agreement allows sources to provide sensitive or candid information without the fear of being publicly quoted, encouraging open and honest communication. However, it also places ethical responsibilities on journalists to respect the terms of the agreement and navigate the complexities that arise when deciding what can be used from such discussions.
Reputational damage: Reputational damage refers to harm done to an individual or organization's public image or credibility, often resulting from negative perceptions or unfavorable information. This type of damage can significantly impact relationships with stakeholders, customers, and the public, leading to a loss of trust and potential financial repercussions.
Sensitive topics: Sensitive topics are subjects that may evoke strong emotions, discomfort, or anxiety in individuals, often because they involve personal experiences, beliefs, or societal issues. These topics require careful handling during interviews, as they can affect the willingness of participants to share information and the overall quality of the conversation.
Source protection: Source protection refers to the ethical and legal obligation of journalists to keep the identities of their confidential sources private. This practice is vital for fostering trust and ensuring that sources can provide sensitive information without fear of reprisal, which is especially crucial when dealing with off-the-record information.
Trust-building: Trust-building is the process of establishing mutual respect, understanding, and reliability between the interviewer and the interviewee. It is essential for creating a safe environment where subjects feel comfortable sharing personal or sensitive information, which can significantly enhance the quality and depth of the interview. Effective trust-building involves active listening, empathy, and clear communication, particularly when navigating off-the-record information, discussing sensitive topics, or addressing culturally sensitive matters.