Morphisms and rational maps are the backbone of algebraic geometry, connecting varieties and unlocking their secrets. They're like the highways and backroads of math, letting us travel between different geometric landscapes and explore their hidden connections.

Regular maps are the smooth highways, defined everywhere with polynomial precision. Rational maps are the adventurous backroads, allowing for more flexibility but sometimes hitting dead ends. Together, they give us powerful tools to navigate the intricate world of algebraic varieties.

Regular vs Rational Maps

Definitions and Distinctions

Top images from around the web for Definitions and Distinctions
Top images from around the web for Definitions and Distinctions
  • A regular map (or morphism) between affine varieties is a map that can be defined by polynomials in each coordinate
    • For example, the map f:A1A2f: \mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{A}^2 given by f(t)=(t2,t3)f(t) = (t^2, t^3) is a regular map
  • A between affine varieties is a map defined by rational functions (quotients of polynomials) in each coordinate, with the condition that the denominator does not vanish on some open dense subset of the domain
    • For example, the map g:A1A1g: \mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{A}^1 given by g(t)=t21t+1g(t) = \frac{t^2 - 1}{t + 1} is a rational map, defined on the open dense subset {t1}\{t \neq -1\}
  • For projective varieties, a regular map is defined by homogeneous polynomials of the same degree in each coordinate, while a rational map is defined by homogeneous rational functions of the same degree
    • For example, the map h:P1P2h: \mathbb{P}^1 \to \mathbb{P}^2 given by h([s:t])=[s2:st:t2]h([s:t]) = [s^2:st:t^2] is a regular map, while the map k:P1P1k: \mathbb{P}^1 \to \mathbb{P}^1 given by k([s:t])=[s2t2:st]k([s:t]) = [s^2-t^2:st] is a rational map

Properties and Extensions

  • The set of regular maps between two varieties forms a ring, called the ring of regular functions
    • This ring captures the algebraic structure of the varieties and their morphisms
  • Rational maps can be extended to regular maps by considering the graph of the rational map and taking its closure in the product of the domain and codomain varieties
    • This process allows us to study rational maps using the tools developed for regular maps
    • For example, the rational map gg above can be extended to a regular map g:A1P1\overline{g}: \mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{P}^1 given by g(t)=[t21:t+1]\overline{g}(t) = [t^2-1:t+1], where [1:1][-1:1] is the point at infinity corresponding to the direction of approach to t=1t=-1

Composition and Invertibility of Morphisms

Categorical Structure

  • The composition of two regular maps (or morphisms) is again a regular map, making the set of varieties into a category with morphisms as the arrows
    • This categorical structure allows us to study varieties and their relationships using the powerful tools of category theory
    • For example, if f:XYf: X \to Y and g:YZg: Y \to Z are regular maps, then their composition gf:XZg \circ f: X \to Z is also a regular map
  • A morphism is an isomorphism if it has an inverse morphism, i.e., there exists another morphism such that their composition (in both orders) is the identity morphism
    • Isomorphisms capture the notion of algebraic equivalence between varieties
    • For example, the map f:A1A1f: \mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{A}^1 given by f(t)=t3f(t) = t^3 is an isomorphism, with inverse f1(u)=u3f^{-1}(u) = \sqrt[3]{u}

Automorphisms and Symmetries

  • A morphism is an automorphism if it is an isomorphism from a to itself
    • Automorphisms capture the symmetries and self-equivalences of a variety
    • For example, the map f:A1A1f: \mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{A}^1 given by f(t)=tf(t) = -t is an automorphism of the affine line
  • The set of automorphisms of a variety forms a group under composition, called the automorphism group of the variety
    • This group encodes the symmetries and self-transformations of the variety
    • For example, the automorphism group of the projective line P1\mathbb{P}^1 is the projective linear group PGL(2,C)PGL(2, \mathbb{C}), consisting of fractional linear transformations tat+bct+dt \mapsto \frac{at+b}{ct+d} with adbc0ad-bc \neq 0

Image and Preimage of a Morphism

Definitions and Properties

  • The image of a morphism is the set of all points in the codomain that are mapped to by some point in the domain
    • For example, the image of the map f:A1A2f: \mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{A}^2 given by f(t)=(t2,t3)f(t) = (t^2, t^3) is the curve {(x,y)A2y2=x3}\{(x, y) \in \mathbb{A}^2 \mid y^2 = x^3\}
  • The preimage (or inverse image) of a subset of the codomain under a morphism is the set of all points in the domain that map to a point in that subset
    • For example, the preimage of the point (1,1)(1, 1) under the map ff above is the set {1,1}\{1, -1\}
  • The image of a morphism is always a constructible set, i.e., a finite union of locally closed sets (intersections of open and closed sets)
    • This property allows us to study the image using the tools of algebraic geometry and topology
  • The preimage of a closed set under a morphism is always closed, and the preimage of an open set is always open (this is the definition of a continuous map in the Zariski topology)
    • This property ensures that morphisms behave well with respect to the Zariski topology on varieties

Applications and Examples

  • The image and preimage of a morphism can be used to study the fibers of the morphism, i.e., the preimages of individual points in the codomain
    • For example, the fibers of the map f:A1A1f: \mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{A}^1 given by f(t)=t2f(t) = t^2 are either singletons {a}\{a\} for a0a \neq 0 or the pair {0,0}\{0, -0\} for a=0a = 0
  • The image and preimage can also be used to study the ramification and branch locus of a morphism, which capture the points where the morphism fails to be a local isomorphism
    • For example, the map f:A1A1f: \mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{A}^1 given by f(t)=t2f(t) = t^2 is ramified at t=0t = 0, and the image point f(0)=0f(0) = 0 is a branch point

Birational Equivalence

Definition and Equivalence Relation

  • Two varieties are birationally equivalent (or birational) if there exist rational maps between them that are inverses of each other on some open dense subsets
    • This captures the idea that the varieties are "almost isomorphic" or "isomorphic up to codimension 1"
    • For example, the affine plane curve {(x,y)A2y2=x2(x+1)}\{(x, y) \in \mathbb{A}^2 \mid y^2 = x^2(x+1)\} is birationally equivalent to the affine line A1\mathbb{A}^1 via the maps f(x)=(x,xx+1)f(x) = (x, x\sqrt{x+1}) and g(x,y)=xg(x, y) = x, which are inverses on the open dense subsets {x0,1}\{x \neq 0, -1\} and {y0}\{y \neq 0\}, respectively
  • is an equivalence relation on the set of varieties, and the equivalence classes are called birational equivalence classes or birational types
    • This allows us to classify varieties up to birational equivalence and study their birational geometry

Function Fields and Birational Maps

  • Birational varieties have isomorphic function fields, i.e., the fields of rational functions on the varieties are isomorphic
    • This provides an algebraic characterization of birational equivalence
    • For example, the function field of the plane curve above is isomorphic to the field of rational functions C(x)\mathbb{C}(x) on the affine line
  • A rational map that is an isomorphism between open dense subsets of two varieties is called a birational map or a birational isomorphism
    • Birational maps allow us to identify varieties up to birational equivalence and transfer properties between them
    • For example, the map f(x,y)=(x,xy)f(x, y) = (x, xy) is a birational isomorphism between the plane curve {(x,y)A2y2=x2(x+1)}\{(x, y) \in \mathbb{A}^2 \mid y^2 = x^2(x+1)\} and the affine plane A2\mathbb{A}^2

Resolving Singularities and Birational Models

  • The process of finding a variety birational to a given variety but with simpler or more desirable properties (e.g., smoothness, projectivity) is called resolving singularities or finding a birational model
    • This is a fundamental problem in algebraic geometry, with deep connections to classification theory and moduli spaces
    • For example, the plane curve {(x,y)A2y2=x3}\{(x, y) \in \mathbb{A}^2 \mid y^2 = x^3\} has a singular point at the origin, but it is birationally equivalent to the smooth curve {(s,t)A2t2=s2(s+1)}\{(s, t) \in \mathbb{A}^2 \mid t^2 = s^2(s+1)\} via the maps f(s)=(s2,s3)f(s) = (s^2, s^3) and g(x,y)=(x,yx)g(x, y) = (\sqrt{x}, \frac{y}{x})
  • Birational models can be used to study the geometry and invariants of singular varieties by relating them to simpler or better-understood varieties
    • For example, the minimal model program seeks to find a "simplest" birational model for a given variety, with mild singularities and nef canonical divisor

Key Terms to Review (16)

Base Change: Base change is a fundamental process in algebraic geometry that allows one to study the behavior of schemes and morphisms when changing the underlying base field or ring. This operation can reveal how properties of algebraic varieties are preserved or altered under different contexts and provides insights into the relationships between various geometric objects. Understanding base change is essential for analyzing morphisms and rational maps, as it influences how these functions behave when one varies the base space.
Birational equivalence: Birational equivalence is a concept in algebraic geometry that describes a relationship between two varieties where they are isomorphic outside of a lower-dimensional subset. This means that, although the varieties may not be identical as a whole, they share significant structural similarities, allowing for rational maps between them. Understanding this concept is crucial in studying projective varieties, morphisms, and the minimal models in birational geometry, as it helps classify varieties based on their geometric properties and allows mathematicians to make meaningful connections between seemingly different objects.
Commutative Diagram: A commutative diagram is a visual representation used in mathematics, particularly in category theory, to show the relationships between objects and morphisms such that the diagram commutes. This means that any path taken through the diagram from one object to another yields the same result, ensuring consistency among the mappings involved. These diagrams are crucial for understanding how different structures relate to each other and for analyzing morphisms and rational maps effectively.
David Mumford: David Mumford is a prominent mathematician known for his significant contributions to algebraic geometry and his work on moduli spaces. His research has greatly influenced various areas of mathematics, including the study of curves, surfaces, and the classification of algebraic varieties, making him a pivotal figure in modern geometry.
Dominant Morphism: A dominant morphism is a type of morphism between two varieties where the image of the morphism is dense in the target variety. This concept is crucial because it indicates that the source variety can be effectively 'mapped' onto a significant part of the target variety, allowing for important interactions between them. Dominant morphisms help us understand relationships between geometric objects, especially when analyzing rational maps and the effects of processes like blowing up and resolution of singularities.
Grothendieck: Grothendieck is a prominent figure in mathematics, known for his revolutionary contributions to algebraic geometry, particularly through the introduction of schemes and topos theory. His work fundamentally reshaped the way mathematicians approach geometric objects and their relationships, especially by emphasizing the importance of morphisms and rational maps in connecting different algebraic structures.
Map from projective space to affine space: A map from projective space to affine space is a function that associates points in projective space, which encapsulates the concept of lines through the origin in a vector space, with points in affine space, which represents geometric structures without a fixed origin. This kind of mapping helps in understanding how geometrical properties transition from a higher-dimensional space to a lower-dimensional one, and it plays a significant role in the study of morphisms and rational maps between different varieties.
Morphism between curves: A morphism between curves is a map between two algebraic curves that preserves the structure of the curves, meaning it respects their geometric and algebraic properties. In algebraic geometry, these morphisms are crucial as they allow for the comparison of different curves and can reveal important relationships between them. A morphism can be thought of as a way to translate points from one curve to another while maintaining the underlying algebraic structure.
Morphism of varieties: A morphism of varieties is a map between two algebraic varieties that respects their structure, meaning it corresponds to a homomorphism of the underlying coordinate rings. This concept is crucial as it allows the translation of geometric properties into algebraic terms and vice versa, creating a bridge between geometry and algebra. Understanding morphisms is key for studying how varieties relate to each other and how they can be transformed through algebraic operations.
Pullback: In algebraic geometry, a pullback is a way to transfer functions or cohomology classes from one space to another via a morphism or rational map. It allows us to understand how properties and structures in one geometric setting relate to another, particularly when considering Chow rings and intersection theory or analyzing the behavior of maps between different varieties.
Rational Map: A rational map is a function between projective varieties that is defined by homogeneous polynomials, but it may not be defined everywhere on the domain. It plays a key role in understanding the relationships between varieties, particularly when dealing with birational equivalence, where two varieties can be related through rational maps that are defined on dense open subsets. This concept ties into various aspects of algebraic geometry, from the study of morphisms to the exploration of minimal models and birational transformations.
Regular Morphism: A regular morphism is a type of morphism between algebraic varieties that locally looks like a polynomial function, meaning it can be expressed as the vanishing of a collection of polynomials. This concept plays a significant role in understanding the structure of algebraic varieties, particularly in affine and projective schemes, where it helps characterize how one variety maps to another and the nature of singularities and smooth points.
Scheme: A scheme is a fundamental concept in algebraic geometry that generalizes the notion of algebraic varieties by incorporating both geometric and algebraic aspects. It is constructed from a topological space along with a sheaf of rings, enabling the study of solutions to polynomial equations and providing a framework for understanding properties of spaces in a more flexible manner. Schemes allow mathematicians to work with both local and global properties, unifying various branches of mathematics.
Theorems on Extension of Functions: Theorems on extension of functions are mathematical principles that provide conditions under which a function defined on a subset of a space can be extended to a larger space without losing certain desirable properties, such as continuity. These theorems are essential in understanding how morphisms and rational maps behave, especially when considering their restrictions and how they can be manipulated while maintaining their structure in algebraic geometry.
Variety: In algebraic geometry, a variety is a fundamental concept representing a geometric object defined as the solution set of a system of polynomial equations. Varieties can be either affine or projective, and they play a crucial role in understanding the relationships between algebraic equations and their geometric representations. Varieties are equipped with additional structure, such as a Zariski topology, which helps in analyzing their properties and the morphisms between them.
Zariski's Main Theorem: Zariski's Main Theorem is a fundamental result in algebraic geometry that establishes a relationship between the birational properties of algebraic varieties and their function fields. It essentially states that if two varieties are birationally equivalent, then their function fields are isomorphic, which implies that rational maps between these varieties can be defined. This theorem connects deeply with concepts like morphisms, resolutions of singularities, minimal models, and schemes, playing a pivotal role in understanding the structure and classification of algebraic varieties.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.