8.3 Ethical Considerations in Legal Research

Legal research involves more than just finding information. It requires careful handling of sensitive data and navigating ethical minefields. From protecting client confidentiality to avoiding conflicts of interest, researchers must stay vigilant.

Ethical considerations in legal research extend beyond individual cases. Researchers must maintain objectivity, use appropriate methods, and recognize personal biases. Understanding and applying ethical guidelines is crucial for conducting responsible and reliable legal research.

Ethical Issues in Legal Research

Handling Sensitive Information

Top images from around the web for Handling Sensitive Information

• 

  Attorney Client Privilege - Legal image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A framework of ethical issues to consider when conducting internet-based research View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information Security Principles View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Attorney Client Privilege - Legal image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A framework of ethical issues to consider when conducting internet-based research View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Handling Sensitive Information

• 

  Attorney Client Privilege - Legal image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A framework of ethical issues to consider when conducting internet-based research View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information Security Principles View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Attorney Client Privilege - Legal image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A framework of ethical issues to consider when conducting internet-based research View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Legal research often involves accessing and handling sensitive or confidential information
  • Client documents
  • Privileged communications
  • Internal memos or reports
• Researchers must take precautions to protect the confidentiality and security of this information
  • Use secure storage and transmission methods (encryption, access controls, physical safeguards)
  • Comply with ethical rules and guidelines on confidentiality and privilege

Conflicts of Interest

• Researchers may encounter conflicts of interest when working on cases or issues where they have personal, financial, or professional stakes in the outcome
  • Personal beliefs or values that conflict with client interests
  • Financial investments or business relationships related to the subject matter
  • Professional affiliations or loyalties that compromise objectivity
• Researchers should disclose potential conflicts and take steps to mitigate their influence
  • Recuse themselves from matters where conflicts cannot be effectively managed
  • Seek guidance from supervisors or ethics counsel when conflicts arise

Ethical Research Methods

• The use of certain research methods can raise ethical concerns
  • Deception or covert observation may violate principles of informed consent and privacy
  • Invasive or high-risk methods may expose subjects to potential harm or discomfort
• Researchers should carefully consider the ethical implications of their chosen methods
  • Obtain informed consent from participants when appropriate
  • Minimize risks and ensure that benefits outweigh potential harms
  • Follow institutional review board (IRB) guidelines for research involving human subjects

Honesty and Objectivity

• Selective reporting or misrepresentation of research findings to support a desired conclusion is an ethical breach
  • Cherry-picking data or sources that confirm a preferred hypothesis
  • Omitting or downplaying contradictory evidence or alternative interpretations
  • Overstating the strength or significance of findings
• Plagiarism, or the unattributed use of others' ideas or work product, is a serious ethical violation in legal research and writing
  • Copying verbatim from sources without proper citation
  • Paraphrasing or summarizing without acknowledging the original author
  • Presenting others' research or analysis as one's own
• Researchers must maintain high standards of honesty, transparency, and objectivity in their work
  • Report findings accurately and completely, including limitations and uncertainties
  • Give credit to all sources and collaborators who contributed to the research
  • Disclose any potential biases or conflicts that may have influenced the research process or conclusions

Applying Ethical Guidelines to Legal Research

ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct

• The American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct provide a framework for ethical behavior in the practice of law
  • Rule 1.1 requires lawyers to provide competent representation, which includes thorough and diligent research
  • Rule 3.3 prohibits lawyers from making false statements or offering evidence they know to be false
  • Rule 4.4 requires lawyers to respect the rights of third parties and refrain from engaging in harassment or unlawful methods
• Researchers should familiarize themselves with the relevant rules and ensure their conduct aligns with these ethical standards

Jurisdiction-Specific Rules and Opinions

• Jurisdictions often have specific rules or opinions governing the ethical use of online research tools, databases, and social media in gathering information for cases
  • Some states have issued guidance on the permissible uses of social media for investigative purposes
  • Courts have grappled with the ethics of using deception or pretext to access online information
• Researchers should stay up-to-date on the ethical rules and opinions in their jurisdiction and consult with colleagues or supervisors when questions arise

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

• Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) set ethical guidelines for research involving human subjects
  • IRBs review research proposals to ensure they meet ethical standards for informed consent, privacy, and minimization of risks
  • Researchers must obtain IRB approval before conducting studies that involve human participants or their identifiable data
• Legal researchers should be aware of IRB requirements and seek guidance when their work may constitute human subjects research

AAAS Ethical Principles

• The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) has developed broad ethical principles for the responsible conduct of research
  • Integrity: Researchers should be honest, accurate, and transparent in all aspects of the research process
  • Objectivity: Researchers should strive to avoid bias and conflicts of interest that may compromise the impartiality of their work
  • Social Responsibility: Researchers should consider the broader societal implications of their work and engage in research that benefits the public good
• These principles provide a useful framework for legal researchers to evaluate the ethical dimensions of their work and make responsible decisions

Client Confidentiality in Legal Research

Duty to Protect Client Confidences

• Attorneys have an ethical duty to protect client confidences and privileged information from unauthorized access or disclosure
  • This duty extends to all members of the legal team, including researchers, paralegals, and support staff
  • Confidential information includes any communication or material shared between the attorney and client for the purpose of obtaining legal advice
• Researchers must take reasonable precautions to safeguard client information
  • Store physical and electronic files in secure locations with restricted access
  • Use strong passwords, encryption, and other technical safeguards to protect digital data
  • Avoid discussing confidential matters in public places or with unauthorized individuals

Attorney-Client Privilege

• The attorney-client privilege protects communications between lawyers and clients for the purpose of obtaining legal advice
  • This privilege extends to research memos, notes, and other work product prepared in anticipation of litigation
  • The privilege belongs to the client and can only be waived with the client's informed consent
• Researchers should clearly mark privileged documents and take steps to maintain the confidentiality of attorney-client communications
  • Segregate privileged materials from non-privileged files and limit access to those with a need to know
  • Assert the privilege when responding to discovery requests or subpoenas for research-related documents
  • Seek guidance from supervising attorneys when questions arise about the scope or application of the privilege

Sharing Research with Third Parties

• Confidentiality agreements or protective orders may be necessary when sharing research findings with experts, consultants, or other third parties assisting with a case
  • These agreements establish the terms and conditions for the use and disclosure of confidential information
  • They may require the recipient to maintain the confidentiality of the information and return or destroy it upon completion of the engagement
• Researchers should consult with supervising attorneys before sharing any client information with outside parties
  • Ensure that appropriate confidentiality agreements are in place and that the disclosure is authorized by the client
  • Redact or anonymize sensitive information where possible to minimize the risk of inadvertent disclosure
  • Keep detailed records of what information was shared, with whom, and for what purpose

Recognizing Personal Biases in Legal Research

Types of Cognitive Biases

• Confirmation bias is the tendency to seek out or prioritize information that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses, while discounting contradictory evidence
  • Researchers may gravitate towards sources or arguments that support their preferred outcome
  • They may dismiss or minimize evidence that challenges their assumptions or conclusions
• Anchoring bias occurs when researchers rely too heavily on an initial piece of information or impression in making subsequent judgments
  • The first case or statute found may become the lens through which all other information is filtered
  • Researchers may have difficulty adjusting their analysis in light of new or contradictory evidence
• Availability bias leads people to overestimate the significance of readily accessible or memorable examples and underestimate the importance of less salient information
  • High-profile cases or widely-cited articles may be given undue weight in the research process
  • Researchers may overlook relevant but less well-known sources or jurisdictions

Strategies for Mitigating Bias

• Actively seek out diverse perspectives and sources that challenge one's assumptions or preconceptions
  • Consult a wide range of primary and secondary authorities, including those with differing viewpoints or methodologies
  • Engage in discussions with colleagues or experts who may offer alternative insights or interpretations
• Collaborate with others to test and refine one's research findings
  • Work in teams to divide research tasks and compare results
  • Present preliminary conclusions to peers or supervisors for feedback and constructive criticism
  • Consider alternative hypotheses or counterarguments and assess their strengths and weaknesses
• Subject one's conclusions to rigorous testing and peer review
  • Carefully examine the logic and reasoning behind each assertion or inference
  • Look for gaps, inconsistencies, or limitations in the evidence or analysis
  • Invite others to review and comment on the research product before finalizing or disseminating it
• Maintain a reflective and self-critical mindset throughout the research process
  • Be aware of one's own biases and how they may influence the direction or interpretation of the research
  • Regularly question and reassess one's assumptions, methods, and conclusions
  • Strive for intellectual humility and be open to changing one's views in light of new evidence or perspectives