Glossary

Ethical review processes are a cornerstone of responsible research in communication studies. These processes ensure that studies protect participants, maintain scientific integrity, and adhere to ethical standards. From institutional review boards to procedures, ethical reviews safeguard the rights and well-being of those involved in research.

Researchers must navigate complex ethical considerations, including privacy, , and potential harm to participants. International collaborations add cultural and regulatory complexities. As research methods evolve, ethical review processes must adapt to address emerging challenges in areas like social media data ethics and sensitive topic interviews.

Ethical review fundamentals

  • Ethical review processes form a crucial component of Advanced Communication Research Methods ensuring research integrity and participant protection
  • These processes involve systematic evaluation of research proposals to ensure adherence to ethical standards and guidelines
  • Ethical reviews help researchers navigate complex moral dilemmas and potential risks associated with human subject research

Purpose of ethical review

Top images from around the web for Purpose of ethical review

  • Promoting transparency, accountability, and access through a multi-stakeholder initiative ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Promoting transparency, accountability, and access through a multi-stakeholder initiative ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Purpose of ethical review

  • Promoting transparency, accountability, and access through a multi-stakeholder initiative ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Promoting transparency, accountability, and access through a multi-stakeholder initiative ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3
  • Safeguards the rights, safety, and well-being of research participants
  • Ensures scientific validity and social value of proposed research studies
  • Maintains public trust in research institutions and the scientific community
  • Promotes accountability and transparency in research practices
  • Mitigates potential legal and reputational risks for researchers and institutions

Key ethical principles

  • upholds individual autonomy and protects
  • maximizes potential benefits while minimizing harm to participants
  • ensures fair selection of research participants and equitable distribution of risks and benefits
  • Non-maleficence obligates researchers to avoid causing harm intentionally
  • Fidelity requires researchers to honor commitments made to participants and maintain confidentiality

Types of review boards

  • Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) operate within academic institutions or research organizations
  • Ethics Committees function in healthcare settings or professional associations
  • National Ethics Committees provide guidance on research ethics at a country level
  • Data and Safety Monitoring Boards oversee clinical trials and assess participant safety
  • Community Advisory Boards involve local stakeholders in research design and implementation

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

  • IRBs play a central role in the ethical review process for communication research methods
  • These boards ensure compliance with federal regulations and institutional policies regarding human subject research
  • IRBs aim to balance the pursuit of knowledge with the protection of research participants

IRB composition

  • Diverse membership includes scientists, non-scientists, and community representatives
  • At least five members with varying backgrounds to promote comprehensive review
  • Gender balance and cultural diversity to ensure broad perspectives
  • Includes at least one member unaffiliated with the institution
  • May involve ad hoc consultants for specialized expertise when needed

IRB responsibilities

  • Reviews research proposals for ethical considerations and regulatory compliance
  • Evaluates risk-benefit ratios of proposed studies
  • Ensures adequate informed consent procedures and documentation
  • Monitors ongoing research for adherence to approved protocols
  • Investigates reports of adverse events or protocol violations
  • Provides guidance to researchers on ethical issues and best practices
  • Maintains records of all review activities and decisions

IRB decision-making process

  • Initial screening of proposals for completeness and eligibility
  • Assignment of reviewers based on expertise and potential conflicts of interest
  • Full board review for studies involving more than minimal risk
  • for minimal risk studies or minor changes to approved protocols
  • Deliberation and discussion among board members to reach consensus
  • Voting on final decisions (approval, conditional approval, or rejection)
  • Communication of decisions and required modifications to researchers

Ethical review application

  • The ethical review application process is a critical step in Advanced Communication Research Methods
  • This process requires researchers to thoroughly document their study design, methodology, and ethical considerations
  • Proper preparation of the application enhances the likelihood of approval and expedites the review process

Required documentation

  • Research protocol detailing study objectives, methods, and procedures
  • Informed consent forms and scripts for participant recruitment
  • Data collection instruments (questionnaires, interview guides)
  • Investigator qualifications and training certificates
  • Funding sources and potential conflicts of interest
  • Plan for data management, storage, and confidentiality
  • Recruitment materials (flyers, advertisements)
  • Letters of support from collaborating institutions or community partners
  • Clear explanation of study purpose, procedures, and duration
  • Description of potential risks and benefits to participants
  • Statement of voluntary participation and right to withdraw
  • Measures to protect confidentiality and data security
  • Contact information for researchers and IRB
  • Adaptation for different populations (children, non-English speakers)
  • Process for ongoing consent in longitudinal studies
  • Documentation of consent through signatures or verbal agreement

Risk assessment strategies

  • Identification of potential physical, psychological, social, and economic risks
  • Evaluation of probability and magnitude of potential harms
  • Comparison of risks to those encountered in daily life or routine examinations
  • Assessment of vulnerable population involvement and additional safeguards
  • Analysis of data security measures to prevent breaches of confidentiality
  • Consideration of long-term consequences of participation
  • Strategies for risk mitigation and management throughout the study
  • Plan for addressing and reporting adverse events

Vulnerable populations

  • Consideration of vulnerable populations is essential in Advanced Communication Research Methods
  • These groups require special protections due to diminished autonomy or increased susceptibility to harm
  • Researchers must balance the need for inclusion with the imperative to protect these populations

Special considerations

  • Capacity for informed consent may be compromised or limited
  • Increased risk of coercion or undue influence in decision-making
  • Potential for stigmatization or discrimination based on research participation
  • Heightened sensitivity to privacy concerns and confidentiality breaches
  • Need for culturally appropriate research methods and communication
  • Consideration of power dynamics between researchers and participants
  • Potential for exploitation in resource-limited settings

Additional protections

  • Appointment of legally authorized representatives for decision-making
  • Use of assent procedures for children or cognitively impaired adults
  • Enhanced monitoring and safety protocols throughout the study
  • Involvement of advocacy groups or community representatives in study design
  • Provision of additional resources or support services for participants
  • Careful consideration of risk-benefit ratios specific to the vulnerable group
  • Implementation of confidentiality safeguards tailored to the population's needs

Examples of vulnerable groups

  • Children and adolescents with limited legal capacity
  • Elderly individuals with cognitive impairments
  • Prisoners or individuals in the criminal justice system
  • Pregnant women and fetuses
  • Individuals with mental illness or developmental disabilities
  • Economically disadvantaged or educationally disadvantaged populations
  • Racial or ethnic minorities subject to discrimination
  • Refugees or undocumented immigrants

Ethical issues in research

  • Ethical issues in research are central to Advanced Communication Research Methods
  • These issues require careful consideration and mitigation strategies throughout the research process
  • Addressing ethical concerns enhances the validity and integrity of communication research

Privacy vs confidentiality

  • Privacy concerns individual control over personal information
  • Confidentiality involves researcher's obligation to protect participant data
  • Balancing data collection needs with respect for personal boundaries
  • Implementing data anonymization and de-identification techniques
  • Establishing secure data storage and access protocols
  • Considering potential for re-identification in data sharing or publication
  • Addressing challenges of maintaining privacy in online research environments
  • Developing strategies for protecting group privacy in community-based research

Deception in research

  • Use of incomplete disclosure or misinformation in study design
  • Ethical justification required when deception is necessary for valid results
  • Assessing potential psychological harm or distress from deception
  • Implementing thorough debriefing procedures post-study
  • Obtaining informed consent for studies involving authorized deception
  • Considering alternative methods to achieve research objectives without deception
  • Evaluating long-term consequences of deception on public trust in research
  • Balancing scientific validity with respect for participant autonomy

Potential harm to participants

  • Identifying and mitigating physical risks in experimental studies
  • Addressing psychological distress from sensitive topics or traumatic recall
  • Considering social harm from stigmatization or breach of confidentiality
  • Evaluating economic risks (job loss, financial costs) of participation
  • Assessing long-term consequences of research involvement
  • Implementing safety protocols and referral systems for at-risk participants
  • Balancing potential benefits against risks in study design
  • Developing strategies for ongoing monitoring and reporting of adverse events

International research ethics

  • International research ethics is a crucial aspect of Advanced Communication Research Methods in a globalized world
  • This field addresses the complexities of conducting research across diverse cultural and regulatory environments
  • Understanding international research ethics enhances the validity and ethical integrity of cross-cultural communication studies

Cultural considerations

  • Recognizing diverse cultural norms and values in research design
  • Adapting informed consent processes to local customs and literacy levels
  • Addressing language barriers in communication with participants
  • Respecting cultural taboos and sensitive topics in data collection
  • Considering local power dynamics and social hierarchies in recruitment
  • Involving community leaders or cultural advisors in research planning
  • Acknowledging different concepts of privacy and confidentiality across cultures
  • Adapting research methods to align with cultural practices and beliefs

Regulatory differences

  • Navigating varying national and regional ethical guidelines
  • Complying with multiple regulatory bodies in multi-site studies
  • Addressing discrepancies between home and host country regulations
  • Understanding local laws regarding data protection and privacy
  • Navigating export controls and restrictions on biological samples
  • Adhering to country-specific requirements for research registration
  • Addressing differences in definitions of vulnerable populations
  • Navigating varying standards for compensation and inducements

Collaborative review processes

  • Establishing partnerships with local ethics committees or review boards
  • Implementing dual review processes (home and host country IRBs)
  • Developing memoranda of understanding between collaborating institutions
  • Engaging in capacity building for ethical review in resource-limited settings
  • Addressing potential conflicts between different review board decisions
  • Implementing mechanisms for ongoing communication between review boards
  • Developing strategies for resolving ethical disagreements among partners
  • Ensuring equitable representation of all stakeholders in review processes

Ethical review outcomes

  • Ethical review outcomes are a critical component of Advanced Communication Research Methods
  • These outcomes determine whether and how research projects can proceed
  • Understanding potential review outcomes helps researchers prepare more effectively for the ethical review process

Approval vs rejection

  • Full approval allows immediate commencement of research activities
  • Rejection requires substantial revision or abandonment of the research proposal
  • Criteria for approval include scientific merit, risk-benefit ratio, and ethical soundness
  • Reasons for rejection may include inadequate protections, flawed methodology, or excessive risks
  • Approval may be granted for a specific time period requiring renewal
  • Rejection decisions typically include detailed explanations and suggestions for improvement
  • Researchers can often resubmit revised proposals addressing IRB concerns
  • Some rejections may be final, particularly for fundamentally unethical research designs

Conditional approval

  • Requires specific modifications or clarifications before full approval
  • May involve minor changes to consent forms or data collection procedures
  • Can include requests for additional safeguards or monitoring processes
  • Often requires researchers to submit revised documents for expedited review
  • May stipulate conditions for participant recruitment or data handling
  • Can include requirements for regular progress reports or safety monitoring
  • Might involve limitations on sample size or study duration pending initial results
  • Conditional approval allows researchers to begin some preparatory activities

Appeals process

  • Provides mechanism for researchers to challenge IRB decisions
  • Typically involves submission of a formal appeal letter with justifications
  • May require new evidence or expert opinions to support the appeal
  • Often includes a meeting between researchers and IRB representatives
  • Can result in reconsideration of the original decision or compromise solutions
  • May involve escalation to higher institutional authorities in some cases
  • Timeframes for appeals process vary by institution and case complexity
  • Outcomes of appeals are usually final, requiring substantial changes for further consideration

Ongoing ethical oversight

  • Ongoing ethical oversight is a crucial aspect of Advanced Communication Research Methods
  • This process ensures continued protection of participants and adherence to ethical standards throughout the research lifecycle
  • Effective ongoing oversight enhances the integrity and credibility of communication research studies

Continuing review requirements

  • Annual or more frequent review of ongoing research projects
  • Submission of progress reports detailing study activities and participant enrollment
  • Review of any adverse events or unanticipated problems
  • Assessment of risk-benefit ratio based on preliminary findings
  • Evaluation of adherence to approved protocols and consent procedures
  • Review of any new scientific findings that may affect participants' willingness to continue
  • Confirmation of adequate data security and confidentiality measures
  • Consideration of the need for re-consent in long-term studies

Reporting adverse events

  • Prompt notification to IRB of any unexpected harm to participants
  • Documentation of the nature, severity, and frequency of adverse events
  • Analysis of the event's relationship to research procedures
  • Implementation of immediate actions to prevent further harm
  • Development of plans to mitigate similar risks in the future
  • Communication with participants about newly identified risks
  • Evaluation of the need for study modification or early termination
  • Reporting to regulatory agencies or sponsors as required

Protocol amendments

  • Submission of proposed changes to research methods or procedures
  • Justification for amendments based on new information or challenges
  • Assessment of how changes may affect risk-benefit ratio
  • Review of modified consent forms or participant communications
  • Evaluation of the need for re-consent from existing participants
  • Consideration of how amendments may affect data integrity or analysis
  • Approval process for minor vs. major amendments
  • Implementation of approved changes and documentation of modifications

Ethical challenges in communication research

  • Ethical challenges in communication research are central to Advanced Communication Research Methods
  • These challenges require innovative approaches and careful consideration of ethical principles
  • Addressing these challenges enhances the validity and integrity of communication studies while protecting participants

Social media data ethics

  • Navigating public vs. private information boundaries on social platforms
  • Addressing informed consent issues for large-scale data collection
  • Ensuring in an era of advanced data linking techniques
  • Considering potential harm from re-identification of anonymized data
  • Addressing platform terms of service in research design
  • Evaluating the ethics of using data for purposes users didn't intend
  • Balancing research benefits with individual privacy expectations
  • Developing guidelines for ethical scraping and analysis of social media content

Covert observation methods

  • Assessing the necessity and justification for undisclosed observation
  • Balancing scientific validity with respect for individual autonomy
  • Implementing safeguards to minimize potential harm or discomfort
  • Addressing consent issues in naturalistic observation settings
  • Considering the ethics of recording public behavior without knowledge
  • Evaluating potential breaches of privacy in online observation
  • Developing protocols for secure storage of covertly collected data
  • Implementing thorough debriefing procedures when appropriate

Sensitive topics in interviews

  • Developing strategies to minimize psychological distress during interviews
  • Implementing safeguards for discussing traumatic or stigmatized experiences
  • Addressing potential legal implications of disclosed illegal activities
  • Balancing depth of inquiry with respect for personal boundaries
  • Training interviewers in trauma-informed approaches
  • Establishing clear protocols for handling emotional distress or safety concerns
  • Considering the impact of cultural norms on sensitive topic discussions
  • Developing appropriate referral systems for participants needing support
  • Future trends in ethical review are shaping Advanced Communication Research Methods
  • These trends reflect evolving technologies, research methodologies, and societal values
  • Understanding these trends helps researchers prepare for future ethical challenges and opportunities

Technology in ethical review

  • Implementation of AI-assisted review processes for initial screening
  • Development of blockchain systems for secure and transparent review documentation
  • Utilization of virtual reality for simulating research scenarios in ethical assessment
  • Integration of machine learning for identifying patterns in ethical concerns across studies
  • Adoption of cloud-based platforms for collaborative international reviews
  • Implementation of automated consent tracking and management systems
  • Development of data analytics tools for monitoring ongoing research compliance
  • Exploration of biometric authentication for enhancing confidentiality in sensitive research

Streamlining review processes

  • Development of common application forms across multiple institutions
  • Implementation of centralized review processes for multi-site studies
  • Creation of risk-based triage systems for expediting low-risk research review
  • Adoption of continuous review models replacing annual renewals
  • Establishment of pre-approved protocol libraries for common research designs
  • Implementation of electronic submission and tracking systems
  • Development of standardized metrics for assessing review efficiency
  • Exploration of peer-review models for ethical assessment in specific fields

Emerging ethical considerations

  • Addressing ethical implications of neurotechnology in communication research
  • Developing frameworks for ethical use of big data and predictive analytics
  • Considering ethical challenges in human-AI interaction studies
  • Addressing privacy concerns in Internet of Things (IoT) research
  • Evaluating ethical implications of genetic information in communication studies
  • Developing guidelines for research involving augmented and virtual reality
  • Addressing ethical considerations in emotion recognition and affective computing
  • Exploring ethical dimensions of quantum computing in data security and privacy

Key Terms to Review (18)

Anonymity: Anonymity refers to the state of being unnamed or unidentified, allowing individuals to provide information without revealing their identity. This concept is crucial in research as it helps protect participants, encourages honest responses, and fosters a safer environment for sharing sensitive information.
APA ethical guidelines: APA ethical guidelines are a set of principles and standards established by the American Psychological Association to ensure the ethical conduct of research involving human participants. These guidelines cover various aspects, including the treatment of subjects, informed consent, confidentiality, and the integrity of the research process. They aim to protect the dignity and welfare of individuals involved in research, ensuring that ethical considerations are central to the research process.
Belmont Report: The Belmont Report is a foundational document in the ethics of human subjects research, established in 1979. It outlines key ethical principles and guidelines that are meant to protect the rights and welfare of research participants, emphasizing respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. This report significantly influences informed consent processes, ethical review practices, and special considerations for vulnerable populations involved in research.
Beneficence: Beneficence is an ethical principle that emphasizes the moral obligation to act for the benefit of others, promoting their well-being and preventing harm. It connects to important aspects of research, ensuring that participants are treated with respect and care, ultimately supporting their welfare throughout the research process. This principle is vital in fostering trust between researchers and participants, as it underlines the importance of safeguarding individuals while gathering valuable insights.
Confidentiality: Confidentiality refers to the ethical principle of protecting private information shared by participants during research. It ensures that personal data is not disclosed without consent, fostering trust between researchers and subjects. Maintaining confidentiality is crucial in various research methodologies to protect individuals and their information, thus allowing for more open and honest participation.
Deontology: Deontology is an ethical theory that emphasizes the importance of duty and rules in determining the morality of actions. It focuses on the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions themselves, rather than the consequences they produce. This approach is crucial in ethical review processes, as it helps establish guidelines for conducting research in a manner that respects individuals' rights and upholds ethical standards.
Ethical approval process: The ethical approval process is a systematic procedure that researchers must follow to ensure that their studies meet ethical standards and protect the rights and welfare of participants. This process typically involves submitting a research proposal to an ethics review board or committee, which evaluates the proposed methods, potential risks, and benefits of the research. Successful ethical approval is crucial for maintaining integrity in research and building trust with participants.
Ethical decision-making models: Ethical decision-making models are frameworks that guide individuals and organizations in evaluating ethical dilemmas and making morally sound decisions. These models incorporate principles of ethics, stakeholder considerations, and systematic analysis to navigate complex situations where values may conflict. They are essential tools in ensuring accountability and integrity in various fields, including research and communication.
Exempt review: Exempt review refers to a type of ethical review process where certain research activities are determined to be exempt from the full institutional review board (IRB) review. This typically applies to research involving minimal risk to participants and may include specific categories such as educational practices, surveys, or studies involving public behavior. By classifying studies as exempt, researchers can streamline their approval process while still adhering to ethical standards.
Expedited review: Expedited review is a process that allows certain research proposals to be evaluated more quickly than standard review procedures, typically because they involve minimal risk to participants. This streamlined process is designed to facilitate timely approval for research that meets specific criteria, ensuring that researchers can commence their studies without unnecessary delays. Expedited review is particularly relevant in contexts where swift action is needed, such as in emergency situations or when research addresses urgent public health issues.
Informed Consent: Informed consent is a process through which researchers provide potential participants with comprehensive information about a study, ensuring they understand the risks, benefits, and their rights before agreeing to participate. This concept emphasizes the importance of voluntary participation and ethical responsibility in research, fostering trust between researchers and participants while protecting individuals' autonomy.
Institutional Review Board (IRB): An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a committee established to review and approve research involving human subjects, ensuring that ethical standards are upheld and participant rights are protected. This board evaluates the risk-benefit ratio of research proposals, safeguards the welfare of participants, and ensures compliance with ethical guidelines, connecting to the broader ethical review processes in research and managing potential conflicts of interest.
Justice: Justice refers to the moral and legal principle of fairness, ensuring that individuals receive what they are due or deserve. It encompasses the idea of treating people equitably, recognizing their rights, and balancing the scales between competing interests. In ethical review processes, justice is crucial as it ensures that research is conducted in a manner that respects the rights and dignity of all participants, particularly vulnerable populations.
Respect for Persons: Respect for persons is an ethical principle that emphasizes the intrinsic worth and dignity of individuals, requiring that they are treated as autonomous agents with the right to make informed decisions about their own lives. This principle recognizes the importance of consent and the necessity of safeguarding vulnerable populations in research, ensuring that their rights and welfare are prioritized throughout the ethical review processes.
Risk-benefit analysis: Risk-benefit analysis is a systematic process for weighing the potential risks against the anticipated benefits of a particular action or decision. This analysis is crucial in ethical review processes as it helps determine whether the positive outcomes justify any possible negative consequences, particularly in research involving human subjects.
Stakeholder analysis: Stakeholder analysis is a systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and prioritizing the interests and influence of various parties that are affected by or can affect a project or decision. This process helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of stakeholders, leading to better communication and more informed decision-making. By recognizing stakeholder dynamics, ethical considerations can be integrated into planning and implementation processes.
Utilitarianism: Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that suggests the best action is the one that maximizes overall happiness or utility. This principle of 'the greatest good for the greatest number' evaluates actions based on their consequences, aiming to produce the most favorable balance of benefits over drawbacks. It is fundamentally linked to discussions about morality, ethics, and decision-making processes in various fields, including communication research and ethical review protocols.
Vulnerable populations: Vulnerable populations refer to groups of individuals who are at a higher risk of experiencing harm, discrimination, or barriers to resources due to various factors such as socioeconomic status, health conditions, age, or minority status. These populations often require special consideration in research practices to ensure their safety and well-being. Understanding the unique challenges faced by these groups is essential for ethical research design and implementation.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide