Glossary

Grounded theory is a powerful qualitative research method that generates theories from data. It emerged in the 1960s, revolutionizing how researchers analyze communication phenomena by emphasizing inductive reasoning and systematic exploration of complex social processes.

This approach provides tools for developing explanatory frameworks grounded in real-world observations. Key principles like constant comparison and guide researchers through iterative data collection and analysis, ensuring robust, data-driven theories in communication studies.

Origins of grounded theory

  • Grounded theory emerged as a qualitative research methodology in the 1960s, revolutionizing approaches to data analysis in communication research
  • Emphasizes theory generation from empirical data rather than testing pre-existing hypotheses, aligning with inductive reasoning in communication studies
  • Provides researchers with systematic tools to explore complex social phenomena and develop explanatory frameworks grounded in real-world observations

Glaser and Strauss approach

Top images from around the web for Glaser and Strauss approach

  • An Introduction to Classical Grounded Theory View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • An Introduction to Classical Grounded Theory View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Glaser and Strauss approach

  • An Introduction to Classical Grounded Theory View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • An Introduction to Classical Grounded Theory View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 2
  • Developed by sociologists and in 1967
  • Emphasizes inductive theory generation from systematic data analysis
  • Advocates for researchers to approach data without preconceived theories
  • Encourages constant comparison of data to identify emerging patterns and concepts
  • Aims to develop middle-range theories applicable to specific social contexts

Constructivist grounded theory

  • Developed by Kathy Charmaz as an evolution of the classic Glaser and Strauss approach
  • Acknowledges the researcher's role in co-constructing meaning with participants
  • Emphasizes reflexivity and the importance of considering multiple perspectives
  • Focuses on understanding subjective experiences and social processes
  • Incorporates more flexible coding procedures and memo-writing techniques

Situational analysis

  • Introduced by Adele Clarke as an extension of grounded theory
  • Integrates postmodern perspectives and focuses on situational complexities
  • Utilizes mapping techniques to analyze social worlds, arenas, and discourses
  • Considers non-human elements (technologies, policies) in addition to human actors
  • Emphasizes the importance of power dynamics and historical contexts in analysis

Key principles

  • Grounded theory principles form the foundation for rigorous qualitative analysis in communication research
  • These principles guide researchers through iterative data collection, analysis, and theory development processes
  • Understanding and applying these principles ensures the development of robust, data-driven theories in communication studies

Constant comparative method

  • Involves continuously comparing new data with previously collected and analyzed data
  • Helps identify similarities, differences, and patterns across various data sources
  • Facilitates the development of conceptual categories and their properties
  • Enables researchers to refine and integrate emerging theoretical concepts
  • Ensures that the developing theory remains grounded in empirical evidence

Theoretical sampling

  • Involves selecting participants or data sources based on emerging theoretical concepts
  • Guides researchers to collect data that will further develop or refine the theory
  • Differs from traditional sampling methods by focusing on concept development rather than population representation
  • Continues until theoretical is reached
  • Allows for flexibility in research design and data collection strategies

Theoretical saturation

  • Occurs when no new theoretical insights emerge from additional data collection
  • Indicates that categories and their properties are well-developed and integrated
  • Signals the point at which data collection can be concluded
  • Requires researchers to critically assess the depth and breadth of their analysis
  • May be reached at different points for different categories within the same study

Memoing

  • Involves writing analytical notes throughout the research process
  • Captures researchers' thoughts, ideas, and insights about the emerging theory
  • Helps track the development of concepts and their relationships
  • Serves as a bridge between data collection and theory formulation
  • Facilitates reflexivity and theoretical sensitivity in the research process

Data collection techniques

  • Grounded theory employs various data collection methods to gather rich, detailed information about social phenomena
  • These techniques allow researchers to explore communication processes from multiple angles and perspectives
  • Combining different data collection methods enhances the depth and credibility of grounded theory studies in communication research

In-depth interviews

  • Involve one-on-one conversations with participants to explore their experiences and perspectives
  • Allow researchers to probe deeply into specific topics and follow up on emerging themes
  • Typically use open-ended questions to encourage detailed responses
  • Can be structured, semi-structured, or unstructured depending on research goals
  • Provide rich, contextual data about individual experiences and meanings

Participant observation

  • Involves immersing oneself in the research setting to observe and participate in social interactions
  • Allows researchers to directly experience and document communication processes in natural settings
  • Provides insights into non-verbal communication and contextual factors
  • Requires careful field notes and reflexivity to capture observations and researcher's role
  • Can be overt or covert, depending on ethical considerations and research objectives

Document analysis

  • Involves examining written materials related to the research topic
  • Includes a wide range of sources (organizational records, personal diaries, social media posts)
  • Provides historical context and insights into formal communication practices
  • Can reveal discrepancies between official narratives and actual practices
  • Allows for analysis of communication patterns across time and different contexts

Coding process

  • Coding forms the core analytical process in grounded theory, transforming raw data into theoretical concepts
  • This systematic approach to data analysis ensures that emerging theories are firmly grounded in empirical evidence
  • The coding process in grounded theory is iterative and non-linear, allowing for constant refinement of concepts and categories

Open coding

  • Initial stage of coding where data is broken down into discrete parts
  • Involves line-by-line analysis of transcripts, field notes, or documents
  • Identifies and labels concepts that emerge from the data
  • Creates provisional categories based on similarities and differences in codes
  • Remains open to multiple interpretations and avoids imposing preconceived ideas

Axial coding

  • Focuses on reassembling data that was fragmented during
  • Explores relationships between categories and subcategories
  • Develops a that includes conditions, actions/interactions, and consequences
  • Helps identify patterns and connections within the data
  • Moves the analysis from descriptive to more explanatory levels

Selective coding

  • Final stage of coding that integrates and refines the theory
  • Involves selecting a that ties all other categories together
  • Explicates the storyline or central phenomenon of the research
  • Validates relationships between categories and fills in gaps in the theory
  • Results in a coherent theoretical framework grounded in the data

Theory development

  • Theory development in grounded theory is an iterative process that occurs throughout data collection and analysis
  • This approach allows for the creation of theories that are closely tied to empirical observations in communication research
  • The resulting theories provide explanatory frameworks for understanding complex communication phenomena

Substantive vs formal theory

  • Substantive theory applies to a specific area of inquiry or context
    • Focused on particular communication settings or processes
    • Derived from data collected in a specific substantive area
  • Formal theory is more abstract and applicable across multiple substantive areas
    • Integrates findings from multiple studies or contexts
    • Offers broader explanations of communication phenomena
  • Both types contribute to understanding communication processes at different levels of abstraction

Theoretical sensitivity

  • Refers to the researcher's ability to recognize and extract relevant data
  • Develops through immersion in the data and familiarity with existing literature
  • Enhances the researcher's capacity to generate concepts from data
  • Involves balancing openness to new insights with analytical thinking
  • Improves over time as the researcher gains experience with the method

Core category identification

  • Involves selecting the central concept that explains the main phenomenon under study
  • Integrates other categories and explains variations in the data
  • Should have analytic power and ability to pull other categories together
  • Often emerges during selective coding but may be evident earlier in the process
  • Guides the final stages of theory development and integration

Evaluation criteria

  • Evaluating grounded theory studies requires specific criteria that align with the method's unique approach to research
  • These criteria ensure the quality and rigor of grounded theory research in communication studies
  • Understanding these evaluation criteria helps researchers design and conduct more robust studies

Fit and relevance

  • Fit refers to how well the theory corresponds to the data and context studied
    • Ensures that concepts and categories accurately represent the phenomena under investigation
    • Demonstrates that the theory is truly grounded in the empirical data
  • Relevance assesses the theory's applicability and usefulness in practice
    • Evaluates whether the theory offers insights that are valuable to practitioners or participants
    • Considers the potential impact of the theory on understanding or addressing real-world issues

Workability and modifiability

  • Workability assesses how well the theory explains and interprets the phenomena under study
    • Examines the theory's ability to account for variations in the data
    • Evaluates the theory's predictive or explanatory power in similar contexts
  • Modifiability refers to the theory's capacity to accommodate new data or insights
    • Allows for refinement and expansion of the theory as new information emerges
    • Ensures that the theory remains relevant and applicable over time

Software for grounded theory

  • Qualitative data analysis software has become increasingly important in grounded theory research
  • These tools assist researchers in managing, coding, and analyzing large amounts of qualitative data
  • Understanding the strengths and limitations of different software options is crucial for effective grounded theory analysis

ATLAS.ti vs NVivo

  • ATLAS.ti
    • Known for its intuitive interface and powerful visualization tools
    • Offers flexible coding and features
    • Provides robust network view for exploring relationships between codes
  • NVivo
    • Offers comprehensive data management and analysis capabilities
    • Includes advanced query tools for exploring patterns in the data
    • Provides strong support for team-based research projects

MAXQDA vs Dedoose

  • MAXQDA
    • Combines qualitative and quantitative analysis features
    • Offers user-friendly interface with customizable workspace
    • Provides strong support for mixed methods research designs
  • Dedoose
    • Web-based platform allowing for easy collaboration
    • Offers flexible pricing models suitable for various project sizes
    • Provides strong support for mixed methods and integrating qualitative and quantitative data

Challenges and limitations

  • While grounded theory offers many advantages, researchers must be aware of potential challenges and limitations
  • Understanding these issues helps researchers address them proactively and enhance the quality of their studies
  • Recognizing limitations also aids in the appropriate interpretation and application of grounded theory findings

Researcher bias

  • Potential for researchers' preconceptions to influence data collection and analysis
  • Requires constant reflexivity and awareness of one's own assumptions
  • Can be mitigated through memo-writing and peer debriefing
  • May impact the interpretation of data and development of concepts
  • Necessitates transparent reporting of researcher's background and perspective

Time-intensive nature

  • Grounded theory studies often require significant time for data collection and analysis
  • Iterative process of theoretical sampling can extend the research timeline
  • Coding and constant comparison demand sustained attention to detail
  • Reaching theoretical saturation may take longer than initially anticipated
  • Can pose challenges for researchers working under tight deadlines or constraints

Generalizability concerns

  • Grounded theory focuses on developing context-specific theories
  • May limit the applicability of findings to other settings or populations
  • Requires careful consideration when transferring insights to different contexts
  • Can be addressed through developing formal theories across multiple studies
  • Emphasizes depth of understanding over broad generalizability

Applications in communication research

  • Grounded theory has been widely applied across various subfields of communication research
  • This methodology allows researchers to explore complex communication phenomena in depth
  • Understanding these applications helps researchers identify potential areas for future grounded theory studies in communication

Interpersonal communication studies

  • Explores processes of relationship development and maintenance
  • Investigates communication strategies in conflict resolution
  • Examines nonverbal communication patterns in face-to-face interactions
  • Studies the role of technology in mediating interpersonal relationships
  • Analyzes communication in diverse cultural and social contexts

Organizational communication analysis

  • Investigates communication processes within and between organizations
  • Examines leadership communication styles and their impact on organizational culture
  • Explores employee engagement and internal communication strategies
  • Studies crisis communication and reputation management processes
  • Analyzes the role of technology in shaping organizational communication practices

Media effects research

  • Investigates audience responses to various media content and formats
  • Examines the impact of social media on public opinion formation
  • Explores the role of media in shaping cultural norms and values
  • Studies the effects of media representation on marginalized groups
  • Analyzes the influence of media on political communication and civic engagement

Ethical considerations

  • Ethical considerations are crucial in grounded theory research, particularly when studying sensitive communication topics
  • Researchers must navigate complex ethical issues while maintaining the integrity of their studies
  • Understanding and addressing these ethical considerations ensures the protection of participants and the credibility of the research
  • Requires clear communication about the study's purpose and procedures
  • Involves obtaining voluntary agreement from participants to take part in the research
  • May need to be an ongoing process due to the evolving nature of grounded theory studies
  • Should address potential risks and benefits of participation
  • Must be documented and stored securely to protect participant privacy

Confidentiality and anonymity

  • Involves protecting participants' identities and personal information
  • Requires careful handling and storage of data to prevent unauthorized access
  • May involve using pseudonyms or codes to represent participants in research reports
  • Considers potential challenges in maintaining anonymity in small or close-knit communities
  • Addresses issues of data sharing and long-term data storage

Reflexivity in research

  • Involves critical self-reflection on the researcher's role and influence
  • Requires awareness of power dynamics between researcher and participants
  • Addresses potential biases and assumptions that may impact data collection and analysis
  • Involves documenting and reporting on the researcher's position and perspective
  • Enhances transparency and credibility of the research process and findings

Key Terms to Review (18)

Anselm Strauss: Anselm Strauss was an influential sociologist known for his contributions to qualitative research methodologies, particularly grounded theory. His work emphasized the importance of understanding social processes and developing theories grounded in real-world observations, rather than purely abstract concepts. This approach is key in developing grounded theory and conducting grounded theory analysis, as it encourages researchers to derive insights directly from data and the lived experiences of individuals.
Axial Coding: Axial coding is a key process in qualitative research where data is organized and connected to identify relationships between categories. It involves reassembling data that was fractured during initial coding, allowing researchers to refine their analyses by exploring the links between concepts and variables. This method is crucial in building a coherent narrative from the data, especially in grounded theory approaches, by focusing on central themes and their relationships.
Barney Glaser: Barney Glaser is a prominent sociologist best known for co-developing grounded theory, a qualitative research methodology that emphasizes generating theories from data systematically collected. His work, particularly in collaboration with Anselm Strauss, has significantly influenced how researchers approach data analysis, focusing on the constant comparison method and the development of theory from empirical observations.
Classic grounded theory: Classic grounded theory is a qualitative research methodology developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss that aims to generate theories grounded in data systematically collected from participants. This approach emphasizes the importance of discovering theory through data rather than testing existing theories, making it particularly useful for exploring social processes and human behaviors.
Coding paradigm: A coding paradigm refers to the systematic approach to categorizing and organizing qualitative data, often used in research methodologies like grounded theory. It involves the development of a set of codes or labels that help in identifying patterns, themes, and concepts within the data, enabling researchers to make sense of complex information. This process is crucial in qualitative analysis as it allows for the generation of theories grounded in empirical data.
Conceptual Frameworks: Conceptual frameworks are structured systems of ideas and concepts that help researchers understand and interpret complex phenomena. They provide a lens through which to view relationships between variables and guide the research process by outlining key constructs and theories that inform study design and analysis.
Constant Comparative Method: The constant comparative method is a qualitative research technique used to analyze data by continuously comparing new data with existing data throughout the research process. This method allows researchers to develop and refine theories as they collect and code data, ensuring that the analysis remains dynamic and responsive to emerging patterns and themes. By iteratively comparing incidents, this approach contributes significantly to grounded theory development and facilitates a deeper understanding of the data being examined.
Constructivist grounded theory: Constructivist grounded theory is an approach to qualitative research that emphasizes the co-construction of knowledge between the researcher and participants. This method focuses on understanding how individuals create meaning from their experiences and interactions within social contexts, thereby recognizing the influence of both personal and cultural factors in shaping those meanings.
Core category: A core category is a central concept in grounded theory that represents the main theme or phenomenon being studied. It serves as a focal point around which other categories and concepts are organized, helping to develop a cohesive theory that explains the relationships among various data points. Identifying the core category allows researchers to create a rich, contextualized understanding of the subject matter.
Focus groups: Focus groups are a qualitative research method where a small group of participants engage in a guided discussion to gather insights about their perceptions, opinions, and attitudes towards a specific topic or product. This method allows researchers to collect diverse perspectives and explore the underlying reasons behind participant responses, making it valuable in various research contexts.
Grounded theorization: Grounded theorization is a qualitative research method that involves developing theories based on data collected from the field rather than starting with a preconceived hypothesis. This approach emphasizes the generation of theory through systematic data collection and analysis, allowing researchers to derive insights that are deeply rooted in real-world contexts.
Interviews: Interviews are qualitative data collection methods where a researcher engages in direct conversation with participants to gather in-depth information about their thoughts, feelings, experiences, and behaviors. This technique is fundamental for understanding individual perspectives and can vary in structure from highly structured to completely unstructured formats, depending on the research approach.
Memoing: Memoing is a qualitative research practice that involves writing reflective notes about data, insights, and ideas that arise during the research process. This technique is essential for developing understanding and generating concepts, as it helps researchers keep track of their thoughts, interpretations, and the evolving themes that emerge from their data analysis.
Open coding: Open coding is the initial step in qualitative data analysis where researchers break down data into discrete parts to identify and label concepts, themes, or patterns. This process allows for a detailed examination of the data, facilitating the emergence of new ideas and categories, which can then be used for further analysis. It serves as a foundational practice in various qualitative methodologies, enabling a more nuanced understanding of complex data sets.
Saturation: Saturation refers to the point in qualitative research, particularly in grounded theory, where collecting more data yields little to no new insights or themes. It signifies that the researcher has captured the core concepts and variations within the data, indicating that further data collection may not contribute meaningfully to the understanding of the phenomenon being studied.
Theoretical integration: Theoretical integration refers to the process of combining different theoretical frameworks or perspectives to create a more comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon. This approach allows researchers to merge insights from various theories, fostering a richer and more nuanced exploration of complex issues.
Theoretical propositions: Theoretical propositions are statements or claims that suggest relationships between concepts or variables within a specific theory, guiding research and understanding. These propositions serve as the foundation for generating hypotheses, which can be tested through empirical research, and they help clarify the scope and application of the theory in various contexts.
Theoretical sampling: Theoretical sampling is a purposeful method of data collection in qualitative research, where researchers select participants based on their relevance to the evolving theory being developed. This approach allows researchers to gather information that directly contributes to the refinement and expansion of their theoretical frameworks, focusing on individuals who can provide insights into specific concepts or categories that emerge during the research process.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide