📻Adaptive and Self-Tuning Control Unit 2 – System ID and Parameter Estimation

System identification and parameter estimation are crucial techniques in adaptive control. They involve creating mathematical models of dynamic systems using input-output data. These methods help engineers understand and predict system behavior, enabling the design of effective controllers. The process includes data collection, model selection, parameter estimation, and validation. Various techniques like least squares, maximum likelihood, and recursive methods are used. Challenges include dealing with noise, nonlinearities, and balancing model complexity with accuracy.

Key Concepts and Terminology

  • System identification involves estimating mathematical models of dynamic systems based on observed input-output data
  • Parameter estimation techniques aim to determine the values of unknown parameters in a given model structure
  • Black-box modeling assumes no prior knowledge of the system's internal workings and relies solely on input-output data
  • Grey-box modeling incorporates some prior knowledge of the system's physical properties or structure
  • Model validation assesses the quality and accuracy of the estimated model by comparing its predictions with actual system behavior
  • Bias and variance trade-off refers to the balance between model complexity and generalization ability
  • Overfitting occurs when a model fits the noise in the training data, leading to poor generalization on new data
  • Underfitting happens when a model is too simple to capture the underlying system dynamics accurately

System Identification Basics

  • The goal of system identification is to develop mathematical models that describe the behavior of a dynamic system
  • System identification typically involves four main steps: data collection, model structure selection, parameter estimation, and model validation
  • The choice of input signals (e.g., step, sinusoidal, or random) affects the quality and informativeness of the collected data
  • Sampling time and data length are crucial factors in capturing the relevant system dynamics
  • Static and dynamic models differ in their ability to represent time-dependent behavior
  • Linearity and time-invariance assumptions simplify the modeling process but may not always hold for real-world systems
  • Noise and disturbances can significantly impact the accuracy of the identified model

Parameter Estimation Techniques

  • Least Squares (LS) estimation minimizes the sum of squared differences between the model predictions and the observed outputs
    • Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) assumes independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) noise
    • Weighted Least Squares (WLS) assigns different weights to each data point based on their relative importance or reliability
  • Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimation finds the parameter values that maximize the likelihood of observing the given data
    • Assumes a probabilistic model for the noise distribution (e.g., Gaussian)
    • Requires knowledge or assumptions about the noise characteristics
  • Bayesian estimation incorporates prior knowledge about the parameters in the form of probability distributions
    • Updates the prior distributions using the observed data to obtain posterior distributions
    • Provides a probabilistic framework for parameter uncertainty quantification
  • Gradient-based optimization methods (e.g., gradient descent, conjugate gradient) iteratively update the parameter estimates based on the gradient of the objective function
  • Evolutionary algorithms (e.g., genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization) explore the parameter space using population-based search techniques

Data Collection and Preprocessing

  • Proper data collection is essential for accurate system identification
  • Input signals should be designed to excite the system dynamics of interest
    • Pseudo-random binary sequences (PRBS) are commonly used for linear systems
    • Chirp signals sweep through a range of frequencies to capture frequency-dependent behavior
  • Sampling rate should be chosen based on the system's bandwidth and the desired model accuracy
  • Data preprocessing steps include:
    • Outlier detection and removal
    • Filtering to remove high-frequency noise or low-frequency trends
    • Scaling and normalization to improve numerical stability and convergence
  • Data partitioning into training, validation, and testing sets helps assess model performance and generalization
  • Input-output data can be organized into regression matrices for batch processing

Model Selection and Validation

  • Model structure selection involves choosing the appropriate model class (e.g., ARX, ARMAX, state-space) and model order
  • Model complexity should balance the trade-off between fitting the data and generalization ability
  • Information criteria (e.g., Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)) provide quantitative measures for model comparison
  • Cross-validation techniques (e.g., k-fold, leave-one-out) estimate the model's performance on unseen data
  • Residual analysis examines the properties of the model's prediction errors
    • Residuals should be uncorrelated, zero-mean, and have constant variance
    • Autocorrelation and cross-correlation plots help assess the model's adequacy
  • Validation metrics (e.g., mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R^2)) quantify the model's predictive performance

Recursive Estimation Methods

  • Recursive estimation updates the parameter estimates as new data becomes available, without storing the entire dataset
  • Recursive Least Squares (RLS) is an online version of the least squares estimation
    • Efficiently updates the parameter estimates and the covariance matrix using the matrix inversion lemma
    • Forgetting factor can be introduced to give more weight to recent data and adapt to time-varying systems
  • Kalman Filter (KF) is a recursive estimation technique for linear systems with Gaussian noise
    • Consists of a prediction step (time update) and a correction step (measurement update)
    • Provides optimal estimates in the sense of minimizing the mean squared error
  • Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) extends the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems by linearizing the system dynamics around the current estimate
  • Recursive Maximum Likelihood (RML) updates the parameter estimates by maximizing the likelihood function recursively

Applications in Adaptive Control

  • Adaptive control aims to adjust the controller parameters in real-time based on the identified system model
  • Model Reference Adaptive Control (MRAC) adjusts the controller parameters to minimize the error between the system output and a reference model output
  • Self-Tuning Regulators (STR) estimate the system model parameters and update the controller parameters based on the estimated model
    • Indirect STR first estimates the system model and then computes the controller parameters
    • Direct STR estimates the controller parameters directly from input-output data
  • Gain Scheduling adapts the controller parameters based on the operating conditions or system state
  • Adaptive Pole Placement assigns the closed-loop poles to desired locations based on the identified system model
  • Adaptive control can handle time-varying systems, uncertainties, and disturbances

Challenges and Limitations

  • Identifiability issues arise when different parameter values lead to the same input-output behavior
  • Persistence of excitation condition ensures that the input signal provides sufficient information for accurate parameter estimation
  • Closed-loop identification requires special techniques to handle the correlation between the input and output signals introduced by the feedback loop
  • Nonlinear system identification is more challenging due to the increased complexity and diversity of nonlinear model structures
  • High-dimensional systems with a large number of parameters may suffer from computational complexity and numerical issues
  • Adaptive control may exhibit instability or poor performance if the identified model is inaccurate or the adaptation is too aggressive
  • Robustness to unmodeled dynamics, disturbances, and noise is a critical consideration in practical applications
  • Balancing the trade-off between adaptation speed and stability is a key challenge in adaptive control design


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.